Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for exceeding allowed parking time. I have not replied, appealed or contacted anyone from Euro Car Parks but would appreciate any advice before deciding on my next course of action. I have attached letter of correspondence    Euro Car Parks PCN.docx
    • It's better to keep advice on the open forum for everyone's benefit. Maybe you could post up the correspondence in a single pdf document and cover up your personal details, reference numbers and so on? HB
    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPI on Swift Advances mortgage.......***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

good Luck I will try and keep up ;)

  • Haha 1

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

good Luck I will try and keep up ;)

 

Thanks for your continued support Alan, when you obviously have you own important issues to deal with - it is most appreciated! It is mainly down to you and PF that I've managed to have the success I have with these PPI claims and for that I'm very grateful :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone:)

 

Well, surprise surprise - today I received a letter from Norton stating that they are in the process of arranging to settle my complaint in accordance with the FOS final decision!

 

They need my authority to allow them to discuss with Swift the details of the PPI and interest paid as well as any rebate received, so they have enclosed a form for me to sign. They estimate they will be in a position to forward settlement details in 6-8 weeks.

 

So far so good - I will return the signed form and see what develops from there, although I am sceptical as to whether Swift will -

 

a) be willing to assist as they have been as helpful as choccy sunglasses when it comes to reclaiming the unfair charges they applied to my account; and

 

b) be truthful in stating how much of a PPI rebate they gave at the time the account was settled early - i.e. I don't believe (from the paperwork I have) that any PPI rebate was received, yet I have visions of Swift telling porkies to Norton by saying my redemption figure included a PPI rebate.

 

Only time will tell ;)

 

Landy x

Edited by landy_alert
Added info....
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Landy, I hope you dont mind me hi-jacking, although I was hoping you could give me some advice, my husband and I were in a similar pickle to you back in around 2004 and we took out a second mortgage with them (I think it was around £20,000) - to cut a long story short we went through the same rigger marole as you and your OH and ended up in the Courts - we had to gather money together to stop our house being reppossed and eventually take out a mortgage to pay off our first and second mortgage to dig us out of a hole. I dont have any paperwork that I can find at all about the Swift mortgage but I am pretty certain that we took it out via Norton Finance - do you think it would be worth me sending a request or do you think it might be too late and untraceable? Would really appreciate your help

 

Samca x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request them its always worth a try, they should still have the documents because under the data protection act they are required to keep them for 6 yrs.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request them its always worth a try, they should still have the documents because under the data protection act they are required to keep them for 6 yrs.

 

PF

 

wow thanks for that fast reply!

 

Even if I dont have the account number or any information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Landy, I hope you dont mind me hi-jacking, although I was hoping you could give me some advice, my husband and I were in a similar pickle to you back in around 2004 and we took out a second mortgage with them (I think it was around £20,000) - to cut a long story short we went through the same rigger marole as you and your OH and ended up in the Courts - we had to gather money together to stop our house being reppossed and eventually take out a mortgage to pay off our first and second mortgage to dig us out of a hole. I dont have any paperwork that I can find at all about the Swift mortgage but I am pretty certain that we took it out via Norton Finance - do you think it would be worth me sending a request or do you think it might be too late and untraceable? Would really appreciate your help

 

Samca x

 

Hi Samca:)

 

That's okay - hijack away (although if you don't already have a thread on this it would be a good idea to start one in order for you to get specific help suited to your own particular circumstances!).........

 

Sorry to hear that you have had problems with Swift/Norton also - there seem to be more and more people coming forward to tell their horror stories about their experiences with Swift.

 

Pompeyfaith is right, I would definitely recommend that you go ahead and send a SAR to both Swift and Norton. They should keep info on you (the data subject) for six years from when your relationship with them came to an end.

 

When did you get shot of Swift? If your second mortgage with them was taken out in 2004 and you had it for a while you should still be within that time-frame.

 

As the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) are building a comprehensive case against Swift and their activities it is worth copying all your correspondence to [email protected] and [email protected]

 

Good Luck and keep us posted as to how you get on!

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request them its always worth a try, they should still have the documents because under the data protection act they are required to keep them for 6 yrs.

 

PF

 

Thanks PF - you beat me to it :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys - I heard an advert on the radio and thought hmmm thats interesting! I didnt start my own thread yet because of the little, well actually no information I have, wasnt sure if it would be worth it - my OH and I are just having a big argument over when exactly it was - the first thing I did when our relationship with them ended was destroy everything - just the sight of their name made me feel quite sick! they were so uncooperative and unhelpful! We know that we definately took out our new mortgage in February 2004 so it would have been then - would that be out of time as it goes over the six years?

 

I will start a thread now so Im not clogging up yours thanks again xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

would that be out of time as it goes over the six years?

 

Maybe, maybe not never heard of a financial company yet that destroys documents bang on the 6 yrs.

 

I have been successful in getting documents as far back as 1996 before now.

 

As I say its is worth the £10 statutory search fee to see what the request throws up.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys - I heard an advert on the radio and thought hmmm thats interesting! I didnt start my own thread yet because of the little, well actually no information I have, wasnt sure if it would be worth it - my OH and I are just having a big argument over when exactly it was - the first thing I did when our relationship with them ended was destroy everything - just the sight of their name made me feel quite sick! they were so uncooperative and unhelpful! We know that we definately took out our new mortgage in February 2004 so it would have been then - would that be out of time as it goes over the six years?

 

I will start a thread now so Im not clogging up yours thanks again xxx

 

Hi Samca:)

 

You're welcome! I'm sure you'll get plenty of help as you are not alone in having been ripped off by Swift/Norton :mad: I for one will pop over and take a look to see if there's anything I can suggest.

 

Can you remember how long roughly you were with Swift before you ditched them?

 

If you know for certain you took out the mortgage in Feb 2004 and you got to the point where they attempted repossession some months must have elapsed so hopefully you are still within the 6 years............as PF says, it's definitely worth a shot - nothing ventured etc etc!

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone:)

 

Just a quick update on this -

 

The deadline that Norton quoted for getting back to me with settlement details has passed so I contacted the FOS to see if they could chase things up for me, but apparently Norton are blaming Swift for the delay..........they said that Swift are having problems providing them with the relevant info to calculate the refund due :(

 

Unfortunately despite this being a complaint which is legally binding, having been upheld by an ombudsman, the FOS say it isn't unreasonable for Norton to require longer to sort out the details of the settlement and there is nothing further they can do to assist at this time.

 

Looks like Norton/Swift are still trying to wriggle out of paying out on this one :mad:

 

Just wondering if anyone knows at what point (if any) I would be in a position to get the court to enforce this one please? I guess it would have to go the full 12 weeks at least that was originally quoted by the FOS?

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone:)

 

Just a quick update on this -

 

The deadline that Norton quoted for getting back to me with settlement details has passed so I contacted the FOS to see if they could chase things up for me, but apparently Norton are blaming Swift for the delay..........they said that Swift are having problems providing them with the relevant info to calculate the refund due :(

 

Unfortunately despite this being a complaint which is legally binding, having been upheld by an ombudsman, the FOS say it isn't unreasonable for Norton to require longer to sort out the details of the settlement and there is nothing further they can do to assist at this time.

 

Looks like Norton/Swift are still trying to wriggle out of paying out on this one :mad:

 

Just wondering if anyone knows at what point (if any) I would be in a position to get the court to enforce this one please? I guess it would have to go the full 12 weeks at least that was originally quoted by the FOS?

 

Landy x

 

Nope dont think so, proceedings can be issued at anytime, it would just be up to you to show that you have been reasonable and prove that they are not forth coming - would be an idea to produce a letter before action though I would have thought

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope dont think so, proceedings can be issued at anytime, it would just be up to you to show that you have been reasonable and prove that they are not forth coming - would be an idea to produce a letter before action though I would have thought

 

Hi Samca:)

 

Thanks for your support! Yes, I was thinking a LBA would be the way to go - as the 12 weeks will soon be up anyway I'll probably wait till then so I appear to be the reasonable one ;)

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi everyone!

 

Well today, 17 months after I first put in the request of a refund of mis-sold PPI on this account and over six months since it was upheld by an ombudsman at the FOS (after the broker refused to comply with the original adjudicator's decision) my refund cheque finally arrived :lol:

 

So success at last and hopefully some encouragement to those currently struggling to get their money refunded, particularly in the light of the judicial review.

 

Many thanks to all who supported and advised me in the early stages of this one!

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...