Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Loan Information Figures not right??????????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am currently in communications with GE Money with whom we had a loan of £25,000.00 last year. We paid this off early and were charged the Early Redemption fees e.t.c.

 

I was sent back the information that I had requested from them and what I would like to know is how do I find out if I was charged commission for this loan. They have written in their letter that this info does not form a part of the data protection act. I have sent them a S.A.R. on the 17th Dec 08 no reply yet.

 

Are they allowed to charge a commission figure and if so how can I find out how much? Letter is attached as to what they sent. Any advise would be magnificent, thanks in advance.

 

http://i450.photobucket.com/albums/qq223/sophiak_bucket/gemoney.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok thanks, will and see what arrives, they sent me a letter on the 5th Jan 09 saying that they have received my S.A.R and will supply me with the information I have requested. Also I will have a good read of their terms & conditions to see if I can find anything about commission being charged in there too.

 

Thanks again, will keep you posted with response I get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

I received a letter from Monarch Recoveries headed

 

CONFIRMATION OF REPOSSESSION PROCEEDINGS

 

I am in 2 months arrears with them and they have asked me start making payments towards the arrears, now what makes me laugh is that I have evidence that they have paid a secret commissions fee to the broker and have charged me £35 x 9 letters for arrears reminders (letters).

I believe they must be monitoring my thread and they are one step ahead of every move I make, but nevertheless I would like to come to some sort of compromise.

I am in £700 arrears and they owe me £700 so I was thinking do I have a right to demand they take this money they owe me and set it off against my arrears?

 

Any ideas from anyone please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a secured loan with Blemain Finance and they have charged to my account 9 X £35 =£315 for letters that they sent me for arrears reminders. I have however since cleared all the arrears so my account is up to date.

I have asked them to refund me this amount that they have charged me as penalties but they wrote saying that they are un-regulated and I cannot complain to the FOS or anywhere else, and I am not entitled to re-claim this money back.

Is this true or do I have a right to reclaim this amount?

Would appreciate any help, thanks. I have a lot of other bills to pay at the mo and it would come in handy.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any Credit Agreement between £1,000 and £25,000 that is governed by the Consumer Credit Act of 1974. The original agreement must have been signed before 6th April 2007. Eligible agreements include:

 

 

* Credit Cards and Store Cards

 

 

* Unsecured Personal Loans

 

 

* Consolidation Loans

 

* Car Loans / Finance Agreements

 

* Secured Loans

 

* Hire Purchase

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same question from me Frettful. I requested a breakdown of charges incurred in 2007 from B and have just had it; over £1400, and that's without the interest they charge over 28 days. My loan is also more than £25,000 so unregulated, and I just can't work out who has the power to penalise them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I have a secured loan with Blemain Finance and they have charged to my account 9 X £35 =£315 for letters that they sent me for arrears reminders. I have however since cleared all the arrears so my account is up to date.

I have asked them to refund me this amount that they have charged me as penalties but they wrote saying that they are un-regulated and I cannot complain to the FOS or anywhere else, and I am not entitled to re-claim this money back.

Is this true or do I have a right to reclaim this amount?

Would appreciate any help, thanks. I have a lot of other bills to pay at the mo and it would come in handy.

 

 

That is true frettful, i know because i have been down the FOS route, however alls not lost, if your credit agreement is covered bt the consumer credt act of 1974 as is mine, they must by law follow that act and even if the FOS dont want to know blemain would have had to follow the guidelines set out by the finance and leasing act, these are the people u need to take your complaint about blemain finance to as they were at that time the relevant governing body, hope this is of some help...there are quite a few on hee with complaints about BF...Gc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cerb, my secured loan is over the £25k mark. So I don't really know where I stand. Any idea's what I should do please about getting a refund of these charges please?

 

I have a letter from blemain that states only loans under £25,000 are unregulated so if yours is over £25,000 it should be regulated..Gc

Link to post
Share on other sites

If You Have Undeclared Commission Payments To A Broker, Be It For Setting Up The Loan, Ppi, Whatever,

 

And It Has Not Been Dislosed On The Agreement, It Invalidates The Agreement

 

Wilson V Hurstanger

 

Getting That Info Would Prob Need An Enforcement Order Through The Court

 

Keep That In Your Back Pocket If They Issue An N1 Claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks postggj,

 

The secret commission Blemain (lender) paid to my broker (Ocean Finance) was not in the loan agreement. I did not know anything about this until I received my subject access request back from Blemain, in which the underwriting sheet was enclosed.

 

I contacted Blemain about this and they said that I should read their terms and conditions in which it states that the lender may pay the broker an extra commission on top.

 

Even though it may state this in the terms and conditions I never knew anything about this extra commission neither is it stated in my loan agreement with them.

 

The claims company I have dealing with my claim have advised me that I should be able to get back this commission plus the broker fee that I paid with interest. What they should I believe be doing is try and wipe of all the interest on my loan and then spread the payments out throughout of the loan term.

 

Blemain could pay off this claims company with a few thousands and get them to try and convince me to take the broker and secret commisson fee with interest back, but I believe that my whole loan agreement should be changed in front of the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...