Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • notodebt
      SJP letter from courts - Car tax fine

      By notodebt · Posted

      I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • tobyjugg2
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By tobyjugg2 · Posted

      You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • notodebt
      SJP letter from courts - Car tax fine

      By notodebt · Posted

      I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Passerby0233
      MET ANPR PCN - NtK - BP Blue Boys Tonbridge - Burger King Car Park NOT BP car park.

      By Passerby0233 · Posted

      Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • BankFodder
      Lost items sent through Parcel2Go and EVRi

      By BankFodder · Posted

      Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Parking Eye - Parking Charge Notice - URGENT advice required

RyRy

By RyRy
in Private Land Parking Enforcement

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

RyRy

RyRy

Posted
Posted

Hi everyone,

 

I was looking for some help in relation to a Parking Charge Notice I received from a company called Parking Eye. The notice states that I was in the FREE Morrison's car park for 44 minutes longer than I should have been despite me not noticing any signs stating the maximum limit (but then I could have missed them). Despite being in a 1st class pre paid envelope I received the notice quite a while after the offence took place.

 

The notice states that 'On the specified date, you were the registered owner, keeper or hirer of the vehicle of the vehicle in question. As such, you are responsible to ensure that the terms and conditions for parking, as set down and clearly displayed in the car park, are complied with.'

 

Now I know that this is not the case as this responsibility falls to the driver. The company then sent me a letter stating that I would receive a discounted rate of £40 if I paid within '4 days of this notification' sent on the 19th of January 2009 but received on the 21st Jan - again I find this unfair. This second notice also included very blurry photos in which you cannot see the face of the driver clearly or even the number plate (although they included a close up of the num plate below the pic).

 

I have read a few posts on various websites that state you should not pay these notices as they are unlawful, a [problem] and they tend to just go away if you ignore them. Is this true??? I am worried that if I dont pay and try this I will eventually be forced to pay an extortionate amount to these jokers.

 

Can anybody offer me any advice please????? Today is the last day for the reduced fee of £40. Also if I do not pay and they do not proceed or follow up, does this effect my credit rating??

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites
jed52

jed52

Posted
Posted

Hello RyRy. first of all, dont worry about it, its just an invoice for an extortionate ammount of money that they have no legal right to collect. Keep the letters from them 'just in case'. Next, ignore it. You will get more letters and demands and notification of court action. Ignore these also. They cant prove who was driving, and you dont have to tell them who was. They wont go to court. Dont contact them in any way, if you do, they will have 'hooked' you. Next, put the kettle on and relax.

Regards, jed

Link to post
Share on other sites
Al27

Al27

Posted
Posted

Parking Eye are well known. You're safe to ignore them.

 

Credit rating is only affected *if* they take you to court (no chance) *and* you lose *and* you still don't pay.

 

Write to Morrisons though and express your disgust. The more people who complain, the more likely Morrisons are to ditch them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DDWales

DDWales

Posted
Posted

As the above advice states-ignore. The invoice that you have been sent should not trouble you. From personal experience if you tried to appeal it would be immediately rejected as the appeals process is done in house. After this you may recieve a few nasty letters from a DCA-again ignore.

Please do write to Morrisons however. As Al27 states, the more that complain they may actually do something about it

Link to post
Share on other sites
RyRy

RyRy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

DD Wales what happened with you? After you appealed did you pay up? Did you hear from them again???

 

It was just the fact it states PARKING CHARGE NOTICE rather than invoice but I guess this is them trying to be 'official'.

 

As I said they do have picture evidence but it isn't very clear and you can barely see the number plate although they have zoomed in and blown it up below each pic.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DDWales

DDWales

Posted
Posted

No. After the appeal-(which i foolishly did before finding CAG) i took the advice from the people on here and paid nothing. What they said would happen did happen. I recieved 2 letters from a DCA telling me i had 7 days to pay firstly £100 then 2 weeks later £150!! That was 6 months ago.... The parking charge notice (invoice) is made to look official but there lies the [problem]. For those who do not have the knowledge of PPC's and DCA's it can seem quite frightening but thats just scare tactics on thier part on those who do not understand the law in these matters. As for the picture evidence again do not worry. If you have any further concerns post the invoice on this thread (washed of your details) and the good people on here could comment further and lessen your worries.

Link to post
Share on other sites
RyRy

RyRy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks DD Wales. I feel more at ease but as you say it can feel worrying. Last thing I want are CCJs or even more expensive fines! Lucky I remembered about this site today - was just going to pay it.

 

How would I go about posting something up on here though?? Just insert it as an image?

Link to post
Share on other sites
crem

crem

Posted
Posted
On the specified date, you were the registered owner, keeper or hirer of the vehicle of the vehicle in question. As such, you are responsible to ensure that the terms and conditions for parking, as set down and clearly displayed in the car park, are complied with.

 

This statement of their's is completely fraudulant and entirely illegal. You can rest assured they will go nowhere near a court to try and substantiate such a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DDWales

DDWales

Posted
Posted

Good.:D

To post on here you can upload (via scanner or phone etc) from Photobucket for example and follow the instructions. Its very simple. When you compose your next response add the link to the page. If your still not sure have a look in the guide on the main page of CAG or take a look at one of the many threads on here to see how it works;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
RyRy

RyRy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
This statement of their's is completely fraudulant and entirely illegal. You can rest assured they will go nowhere near a court to try and substantiate such a claim.

 

Really? So I am 100% secure in that sense.....

 

As Long as if it comes to it I have a legal foot to stand on then I will hold my ground....

Link to post
Share on other sites
RyRy

RyRy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

They do correct themselves and say 'Date of Offence' on the second letter. That make any difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites
nero12

nero12

Posted
Posted
"offence" makes it worse - for them not you. be reassured.

Not being funny guys but the scan has far too much info on it. The photos and the ref number there together with your first post.

I would advise removing the ticket, we dont need to see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
nero12

nero12

Posted
Posted (edited)
Not being funny guys but the scan has far too much info on it. The photos and the ref number there together with your first post.

I would advise removing the ticket, we dont need to see it.

Infact for future ref: if there are tickets with photo's and people insist on scanning ,the photo's should be removed along with bar codes, dates times and ref numbers. Just incase we have a troll.

Edited by nero12
Link to post
Share on other sites
RyRy

RyRy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Infact for future ref: if there are tickets with photo's these should be removed along with bar codes, dates times and ref numbers. Just incase we have a troll.

 

Cheers - just wanted to make sure you made an informed judgement based on all the information. I've taken them down now!

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DDWales

DDWales

Posted
Posted

No problem. It is always best to be fully informed before making any decisions and there are plenty of people on here that will help you as best possible. As the stickie suggests though be careful when posting anything as PPC's/DCA's monitor this site and a few members on here are actually from PPC's and DCA's

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...