Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robbery at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5576 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I may not have the right forum, but it is an employment problem.

 

Last November I was involved in a robbery at work, I gave a statement to the police.

 

Is it normal for the police to show my employer my statement ie the next day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, your works will be carrying its own investigtion out for insurance purposes, so they would need to see the statments of all involved anyway to ascertain if it was an "inside job" or not.

 

if you werent involved in the robbery, then theres nothing to worry about really, unless they try to use it against you in some fashion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, a boss in the firm is using it against me, even though there are witnesses to the robbery. It's quite a complicated story, which hopefully will be resloved shortly, I'll post the full story when that happens, to show the lenghts a boss will go to, to get rid of an employee...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem to read like that, sorry, first time I've ever posted in a forum. I was working when someone (could use a better word, but public forum) came behind my counter, threatened me with a knife and stole a small amount of money and my handbag. Two yrs ago, same company, different location I had locked up and was leaving work, when I had a gun held at my head while another person snatched my handbag, got a wollop for that because I wouldn'd let go, but I was more frightened of that knife.

 

I've now decided it must be my designer handbags there after, fashion by Oxfam, sorry, I'm being cynical. Needless to say I've now decided after being in this line of work for 15yrs, it's time for a change of career, if there's anything out there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must be a very unlucky to have been subjected to two crimes involving weapons.

 

I am concerned that that the police broke the Data Protection Act by sharing your witness statement with other parties. Did the statement contain your personal details, like your dob? I don't see how the police can consider the employer innocent and make him privy to employees' statements until the investigation is concluded. It would be for the police to determine whether it was an inside job.

 

I would be as mad as hell if the police did this to me. It could potentially damage irrevocably the employer/employee relationship.

 

I would seriously consider checking with the Information Commissioners Office. Don't bother checking with the police first; it's doubtful whether you'd get an informed or honest answer. Get the facts from the horse's mouth. If they have indeed broken the law, think seriously about making a formal complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am concerned that that the police broke the Data Protection Act by sharing your witness statement with other parties. Did the statement contain your personal details, like your dob? I don't see how the police can consider the employer innocent and make him privy to employees' statements until the investigation is concluded. It would be for the police to determine whether it was an inside job.

 

 

They haven't breached the Act. The s.29(1) & s.35 (2)(a) exemptions apply throughout their investigation.

 

29 Crime and taxation

 

(1) Personal data processed for any of the following purposes—

(a) the prevention or detection of crime,

(b) the apprehension or prosecution of offenders, or

© the assessment or collection of any tax or duty or of any imposition of a similar nature,

are exempt from the first data protection principle (except to the extent to which it requires compliance with the conditions in Schedules 2 and 3) and section 7 in any case to the extent to which the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in this subsection.

 

35 Disclosures required by law or made in connection with legal proceedings etc

 

(1) Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions where the disclosure is required by or under any enactment, by any rule of law or by the order of a court.

(2) Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions where the disclosure is necessary—

(a) for the purpose of, or in connection with, any legal proceedings (including prospective legal proceedings), or

(b) for the purpose of obtaining legal advice,

or is otherwise necessary for the purposes of establishing, exercising or defending legal rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would refer to disclosure of the victim/witness statement in the event of legal proceedings to such bodies as the Crown Prosection Service or Magistrate's Court. I cannot believe that the police have the right to show other parties (involved or not) your statement during an investigation without your permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would refer to disclosure of the victim/witness statement in the event of legal proceedings to such bodies as the Crown Prosection Service or Magistrate's Court. I cannot believe that the police have the right to show other parties (involved or not) your statement during an investigation without your permission.

 

You may like to think that - but you would be wrong.

 

The exemptions in the Act are just that - exemptions. There is nothing that limits the exemptions in terms of to whom the data is disclosed.

 

Think about it for a minute. If you give a statement to the Police, they will likely show it to a potential suspect during questioning to prove/disprove statements by the suspect.

 

Any statement given by you cannot be limited to CPS or Magistrates' Court. What about Crown Court? What about evidence disclosure requirements to the accused? What if the information needed to be passed to HMRC, Immigration, local authority, etc; The list is potentially endless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider it to be 'leading a suspect' or 'entrapment' if my witness statement was shown to a suspect.

 

Out of interest I contacted the Force Data Protection Officer. His response was that it would depend on the circumstances, but they can pass witness statements to other statutory authorities and to external companies like insurance companies if the reason is compatible with their policing purpose, which is prevention and detection of crime and apprehension and prosecution of offenders. He also said witness statements are passed to the defence in court cases, although address and contact details are normally withheld.

 

In this particular post, the witness is also the victim. If I was in such a situation and I found out that my statement had been shown to my employer without my permission (and why should he/she be considered not to be involved in the crime) I would make a formal complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...