Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ confusion


Luminol
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

(Moved this thread from Debt, because I think I posted there in error and it might be better to get help from the legal section)

 

Hi All,

 

I have received a statement today from an old RBS account which I have a CCJ against me for. The statement shows my payments which are for £2.00 a month and in addition they show interest being added to the account for the same period £1087.00.

 

My confusion is caused by the Judgment stating, 'The court has therefore decided the rate at which you should pay. You must pay the claimant £14647.87 for debt (and interest to the date of Judgment) and £250.00 costs'.

 

On the statement I received it states the balance as being £19584.72 DR, so how has the amount grown to this much?

 

I honestly thought a fixed debt would be manageable eventually, but if it keeps growing I can't see an end in sight. I wonder if Bankruptcy would be a better option?

 

Thanks

 

Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If the judgment say that interest is payable to the date of judgment then that is all the interest that is payable.

If they are continuing to add interest then that is in breach of the judgment and you should write to them pointing this out (politely) as it sounds as if they have made a cock-up somewhere.

If they refuse to respond appropriately then go straight back to the court and ask how you can complain about them.

 

In any case you haven't paid more then the judgment amount - and at £2/month you won't for some considerable time yet (if you do then you will be older than Methuselah!) and won't be in a position to be bothered by it.

 

You could take the view that it's easier to continue paying the monthly £2 than to rock the boat and maybe make things worse.

  • Haha 1

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of questions.

1.When was judgement entered ? and did you attend ?

2.What was the total of the Judgement ?

3.What was this for (what does it relate to-and do you agree with the figures)

4.Who have you been paying the £2.00 a month to ?

5.This notice you have just got-when was this hearing and did you attend?

6.What date is on the notice ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your responses, Ok this was for a Bank account and loan and way before I found C.A.G. (my OH has debt issues and through CAG Ive prevented all of them going to court and any payments being made).

 

1.When was judgment entered ? and did you attend ?

 

14/07/2006, I didnt attend, just sent off, a can only pay £1.00 a month letter from National Debtline.

 

2.What was the total of the Judgement ?

 

£14,897.87

 

3.What was this for (what does it relate to-and do you agree with the figures)

Bank Loan and Overdraft, correct at time of hearing (probably alot of charges there too, but I didn't know about claiming them back then).

 

4.Who have you been paying the £2.00 a month to ?

 

Credit Management services, Kendal Court, Ironmasters Way Telford (In house RBS Debt Dept. I believe).

 

5.This notice you have just got-when was this hearing and did you attend?

 

The thing I have just got is a statement of the account, 1st one I have ever seen, hence me being confused at this increase, I believed that when my 2 year old went to school I could go to work, and pay off the amount, until I saw it had grown by £5000.

 

6.What date is on the notice ?

 

If you mean the statement, its undated, it says Balance forward etc Int to 15/sep 569.39 and int to 16/dec 518.48....

 

I have always made payments, but was totally unaware til last week when I received the statement that it was still going up.

 

My financial position still isn't great, my Husband works, nothing special though and I have no income at all. So don't know what would happen if they asked for more money off me at this time??? I'm just confused really and annoyed. RBS never sent me to DCA when I became unable to pay, it was straight to court :(

 

I am quite happy to follow this through, because I feel RBS are going against the Judge, and thats not fair, How can I ever clear this up at the rate they are adding interest.

 

Thanks again

Edited by Luminol
highlighting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Kendal Court is their in house collection arm-I hae had a few run inns with these.

Its reasonable to assume that in addition to charges on this account,there would also have undoubtably been PPI.There could have been some breaches under the OFT guidelines on debt collection.

 

I suggest that you do two things.

1.Write to Kendal Court and request an explanation for the figures.Tell them that you want it explaned clearly and concisely.

 

2.Send a SAR for the full account details,to include statements,screenshots,communications with third parties,details of all interest/additional fees levied,etc etc.

The request will need to be clear and specific.

 

Its possible we could be talking of a considerable sum with the interest.

When was the account first opened-I mean roughly what years are we talking ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its likely that RBS will say that they will defend any action that you may take to recover charges,on the basis that you have been repaying them and didnt dispute them earlier.

However,the arguement here,is that you was unaware that the charges were unfair or unlawful,and have only recently become aware of that fact.

Personally I have not found these easy to deal with.My claim goes back to 2006,and concerns defaults and data protection issues.The case was stayed and I have had 3 applications to lift it refused-but I know that my time will come.....and so do they.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin,

 

The account is approx 12 years old, I'm ok with the SAR request, I have a letter on file for that (do I send it to RBS head office or to Kendal Court?).

 

Any suggestions to the wording of the letter to explain the amounts and am I correct in thinking that they shouldn't of added any further interest to the account, as in was settled at 14k? because if thats the case I think I should mention that in the letter.

 

Last one! Whats the likelyhood of them taking me back to court to increase my payments?

 

Thanks again

 

Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin,

 

The account is approx 12 years old, I'm ok with the Subject Access Request request, I have a letter on file for that (do I send it to RBS head office or to Kendal Court?).

 

Any suggestions to the wording of the letter to explain the amounts and am I correct in thinking that they shouldn't of added any further interest to the account, as in was settled at 14k? because if thats the case I think I should mention that in the letter.

 

Last one! Whats the likelyhood of them taking me back to court to increase my payments?

 

Thanks again

 

Lumi

 

 

Hi Lumi,

 

12 years is well outside Limitation,but can still be challenged on the basis of section 32.

The biggest problem may be them saying they dont have statements-although they MUST have transaction info since they would have needed it to get the CCJ presumably.

Send the SAR to RBS data protection-the address is in the contacts stickie in the RBS Forums.

 

As regards the letter to Kendal Court,I think that you will need to see a copy of the original order-did it grant them continued interest ?

Theres no reason why you should not ask for copies of this in your SAR.

 

You could make a request under the consumer credit act to Kendal Court,asking for a full breakdown of interest and any fees added since the CCJ,and ask to be given an explanation as to how these have been calculated.

You could of course say that you were not aware that interst on the account should still be accruing and ask them to justify the entitlement and legality of their rights to apply it.

keep a copy and send recorded.

 

Its not beyond reason or possibility that they will threaten Court action,but you can deal with this if they want to try.You should continue to maintain the payments meantime.

Certainly if it can be seen that they are taking any hostile or adverse action on account of you looking to recoer charges from THEM,then there is a route to follow to address this.

If you want a brief temp letter putting together,then let me know.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again,

 

Ok, Would love help with the letter, I am going to go in the loft tomorrow, I'm quite good with paperwork and I may have kept a copy of the order, will let you know!

 

I dont understand why on the final decision from the court it mentions interest only to the Judgment date (are the court misleading me?), I can post this tomorrow with Photobucket (or I can try) if you'd like to see it,

 

For now I have bedtime stories to read, but I'll be back tomorrow, thanks again for your help, its really appreciated :)

 

Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Lumi-would be good if you can find it yes.

If you have probs uploading-then you can email it to me as file.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin,

 

Since these purported interest and other charges are not part of the judgment [see post 1] then they are simply not pertinent and not payable. Full stop.

Any discussion about how they are calculated, or whether statements are available, is simply clouding the issue.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So guys, does the paragraph on the claim form that states:

 

'The claimant claims continuing interest at the relevant rate or alternatively pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date of issue until Judgment or sooner payment.'

 

mean that they should not be adding further interest? I'm not aware of the section 69 or what that bit means.

 

If you need anymore forms, I can get digging!

 

Thanks Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 69 is the 8% interest that only the Court can award.

Actually its also discretionary-meaning that although you can ask for it-its not a foregone conclusion that the Court will award it-although in most cases it will.

 

 

So they should not be continuing to take this.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a little confused as to the discrepancy of the figures between those shown on the default notice-and those on the claim form.

The default notice shows-11 something ?

The claim form shows 14647.87

 

Ok granted theres 5 months between the default notice and claim issue....but it still doesnt appear to add up.

 

 

I will ask other site team members to take a peek for an opinion.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin,

 

Since these purported interest and other charges are not part of the judgment [see post 1] then they are simply not pertinent and not payable. Full stop.

Any discussion about how they are calculated, or whether statements are available, is simply clouding the issue.

 

 

In order to get to the bottom of this and properly advise,there have to be some questions.By nature of the interest being added without explanation-I think its fair to say that the issues were clouded BEFORE anything was posted.

It is of course up to the bank to prove any case if they were wanting to escalate this.

But its not unreasonable for the OP to want to see any paperwork-to help them to point out the shortcomings to the bank.

I certainly dont see this as "Rocking the boat and making things worse "

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Martin, I shall await your advice on the amounts and if you could help with my query letter I'd be grateful, but just to clarify, according to the Judgment, they should no longer be adding interest?

 

I will hang back with the SAR until we know the particulars of my complaint, if you think thats right.

 

Many Thanks in advance

 

Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lumi the account details are clearly showing !!!

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the benefit of those following-the statement shows 2x quarterly interest amounts;

 

To Sept 2008 £569.39

 

Sept 2008 to Dec 2008 £518.48

 

It does appear to equate to 8%.

 

So yes-there is the confirmation of this.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay heres my attempt at a letter, I am not gifted with letter writing, so any help suggestions will be gratefully recieved!

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for the statement I recently recieved from yourselves relating to account no xxxxxxxxx. This statement has brought to my attention an discrepancy relating to the interest applied to this account, as you are well aware the account in question is subject to a County Court Judgment.

 

The details of the judgment stated that 'The court has therefore decided the rate at which you should pay. You must pay the claimant £14647.87 for debt (and interest to the date of Judgment) and £250.00 costs'.

 

In light of the recent and only statement I have receieved it seems clear to me that you are still adding a substantial amount of Interest to this account regardless of the court ruling.

 

I would be grateful if you can advise me of your position in relation the account.

 

Many Thanks

 

Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...