Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Liz v Barclays - Mercantile Court **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first posting. I have been through the stages written to Barclays and been offered less than half back, so have now gone down the small claims court route. Saturday was the last day then I could apply for a judgement, but I have received a letter confirming they are going to defend the claim, Is this normal for Barclays?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To be honest i wouldn't worry to much about that. This happens a lot through various banks etc. The likelihood is, it will never make it to court. Read through lots of threads. There are a few in similar situations as yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Been off the site for a while as thing between me and barclays had stopped.

Here's a quick run down.

9th March 2006 - Requested Statements

4th April 2006 - 1st letter to Barclays asking to refund charges

26th April 2006 - 2nd letter to barclays

23rd May 2006 - Barclays offered less than half as gesture of goodwill

25th May 2006 - Rejected barclays offer

June 2006 - stared small claim route via courts

21st July - Barclays defended claim after extension of 14 days

2nd August 2006 - Returned allocation Questionnaire, asking for standard disclosure to end this rapidly rather than clog up courts. Sent copy to Barclays and with a letter asking them to settle rather than go to court, but letting them know i was prepared to go all the way if need be.

 

 

Then it all went quite - I heard nothig from Barclays or the court. But today I get a letter from the court headed " General form of Judgment or Order" that reads

 

Before DISTRICT JUDGE JACEY sitting at lambeth County Court (then full address).

 

Upon the courts own initiative without a hearing.

 

IT IS ORDEREDTHAT

 

1. This matter be transferred to the London Mercantile Court (ST DUnstans House) forthwith.

 

Date 25th August 2006

 

 

What does this mean ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means that the judge won't allow the case on the small claims track. How much is your claim?

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liz ....couple of questions.

 

Is this a current or Business account ?

 

Are you based in the London area ?

 

How much is the claim for ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I have been out of the loop for a few weeks, but certainly it seems odd for a personal case to be transferred to the MC. The only thought is that the judge is trying to force the issue into a court that can set a precedent.

 

I would expect a settlement to be made, but this may delay things.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to a few cases a couple of months ago. It seems that the judge wants to do it in the mercantile court so that they can settle the issue of unlawful charges once and for all. As I recall, it caused a bit of a flap at the time. My guess is that all this will achieve is that Barclays will settle pronto. The last thing in the world which they want is some sort of show trial focussing on their unlawful charges!

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe me, Barclays will be in a much bigger flap over it than you!

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all your replies.

 

Its a personal case

The claim is for £1680.oo, so should be covered under small claims.

I am in London, originally it was allocated to Lambeth

 

Hopefully Barclays will now pay up, if not I will just have to go to court, if that day arrives hopefully a number of you will kindly turn up as well to give me support.

 

I'll keep you all updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, a few of us wouldn't miss it for the world!

 

If you have a search for "mercantile", you will find a thread referring to Elliott. These were the first ones who got transferred to Mercantile. Have a read of the thread (quite a long one, it cause a bit of a stir), hopefully, it will help put your mind at rest. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL...I don't think the court will be big enough to cope with the demand for seats!!

 

Thank you all your replies.

 

Its a personal case

The claim is for £1680.oo, so should be covered under small claims.

I am in London, originally it was allocated to Lambeth

 

Hopefully Barclays will now pay up, if not I will just have to go to court, if that day arrives hopefully a number of you will kindly turn up as well to give me support.

 

I'll keep you all updated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they held the case at Wembley stadium there would still be a queue to get in !:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bookworm, I have read up on the Elliot case and it seems that the Daily mail are monitoring and reporting on Bank Charges.

 

When I get a firm court date I may let them know(Daily Mail) to get some publicity for the cause, what do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liz

 

Well i am not sure whether i hope you go or hope you dont, having just submitted a claim that is fast track it would be nice if there was case law establsihed the kicked all the banks arguments into touch without me havign to think too hard about such matters.

 

Anyway heres hoping they do what you want and that its settled.

 

Glenn

 

PS ill come if it does go, as long as it doesnt clash with any 'dates' i might have coming up!!

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they held the case at Wembley stadium there would still be a queue to get in !:)

 

I think that they would have no problem filling the stadium ;) maybe they should look at doing what they do over in america and actually put these cases on the Tv live if they ever went that far :D

If you find this info useful please click on the scales in the bottom left corner of the thread :wink:

 

Vodafone To Remove Default Notices thread

Paid In Full HSBC Was Claiming £3851.42 But Instead of Paying Me Decided to pay my £4900 Loan OffDG Solictors. Need Help

Concluded Lloyds TSB 27/05/2006 Action Against LloydsTSB

Concluded Lloyds TSB for Girlfriend. 27/05/2006

Paid In Full Capital One £160 Settled

Paid In Full Capital One Sent 15/05/06 for £1372 for Girlfriend

Paid In Full Cetelem £130 Settled

Paid In Full The AA £400 Settled

Paid In Full First National £160 Settled

PDA LloydsTsb Credit Card Hand Delivered 26/04/06 £180

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been no request from Liz up to now.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...