Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you mean you did aos on mcol yes? pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.   dx  
    • The Letter of Claim information is not absolutely essential, but it would be useful for two reasons. Firstly, judges take a dim view of companies or individuals who rush to court without giving the other party notice and a chance to settle - the Letter of Claim.  If they didn't send it we could include this point in your defence and it would be detrimental to them. Secondly, we know Countrywide.  They are a very small cowboy company.  The are reluctant to do court, simply becasue they are very bad  at it.  Their record of beating Caggers in front of a judge is exactly 0%.  They have lost every time.  They send the Letter of Claim also to look for people who don't reply, thinking that the person might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  Conclusion - always best to reply to a Letter of Claim and ridicule the PPC's case.
    • Any update here? I ask as we have someone in a similar situation.
    • It's possible.   I suffer from ADHD and also anxiety and depression currently and struggle with paperwork.  I'll have a search around to see if i can find anything.  If they did send something I haven't replied.   I thought there's no way that they will pursue this because I know for a fact i didn't park in a private space and the evidence they have sent is so ridiculous.   What impact does this other paperwork have? Thanks!   I already sent the acknowledgement as i panicked and thought today was the last day to respond.   Then i remembered this wonderful forum.  I'll follow the steps in the sticky next.
    • The particulars of claim doesn’t mention statement of accounts.  Should I include that in the cpr letter?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

i owed the council just short of 1300 pounds equita demanded that i pay £200 a month back and this i have kept to, i then missed decembers payment and it has been passed to a bailiff called craig, equita and the council won't discuss this issue now. i Rang craig and asked him to clarify some points before we started any discussion about payments, theses were

are you a certified bailiff ( checked he is)

the starting balance,

any payments made,

remaining balance,

any fees ,charges made,

he said to ring back tomorrow, what i need to know is if they have added fees and charges which from the forum i know not to be legal what do i do ? should i not pay any more untill there removed, offer carry on paying my installments, (£600 remaining) or something different.

please help as i've got to ring back tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The liabilty order was for £1224

divided into six payments of £204, i have paid £612 so i know i owe exactly £612 plus any other charges, craig has not been yet i'm ringing at 10 tomorrow to get his figures for whats owed, what i'm after is to know what they can legally charge me so if he's added a load on i can reply to him straight away, chabged the front door lock to one that stays locked when closed so he can't walk in , the old lock just stayed open unless locked with key.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent the following to my local councillors

Account Number –**********

Equita Number - **********

Dear Sir,

Whilst I understand the importance of recovering council tax it is with regrets that

due to financial hardship over the last two years I fell behind with my council tax, the debt was passed to equita who you employ to recover debts.

Despite discussions with the CCCS who were advising me on my debt situation Equita would only allow me to repay the debt over six months at £204 per month. We struggled but we did manage to pay three payments before we fell behind on our mortgage as we did not have enough money to pay both, we missed a payment in December and the matter was referred to a collection Bailiff. Equita now refuse to discuss the issue with me and the council refuse to discuss the issue with me,

I have been informed by the bailiff that even though he hasn't visited my house he has added £180 to the bill, after researching bailiff law I have found that this is illegal, there are statuary fees in place for bailiff fees set by the government, starting at 12.5% of the first £100 and going up, it can be researched on the net.

These fees are only applicable after the first visit where access is not made.

I am more than willing to pay the debt as stated but will not be held to ransom by a company employed by yourselves who are acting illegally and exploiting people who are most at need.

I can only guess at the number of people who have through fear and ignorance has had to pay these illegal fees and request that you investigate this matter with Equita direct.

I can assure you that with a simple search of the internet regarding Equita and there method of operations you may come across their questionable or illegal way of dealing with people is this really a company which you choose to represent Salford.

My question is what do I do now, I am willing to pay off the debt but not to a bailiff who imposes illegal fees, do you as a council condone or are aware of this practice, ant help would be appreciated.

It is my intention to forward this email to a selection of local councillor’s and the local Salford Advertiser and await your responses.

Many thanks

********************************

Wonder if i get a reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

if craig has a signed walk in pocession then you will probably be charged a van call or default fee, which is basicly because said bailiff is calling with the intention to remove, if this is the case then he can legally charge up to £150 well its meant to be reasonable costs but im sure this fee has never been disallowed as yet, if im wrong then im sure someone will be along shortly to correct it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi hope you dont mind but i've made your last post more readable. Cant really offer any help as i'm going through a similar thing with Equita but can tell you that you'll get some great help here on CAG. Good luck

 

Emma Royd

xx

 

 

Account Number –**********

Equita Number - **********

Dear Sir

Whilst I understand the importance of recovering council tax it is with regrets that due to financial hardship over the last two years I fell behind with my council tax, the debt was passed to equita who you employ to recover debts.

Despite discussions with the CCCS who were advising me on my debt situation Equita would only allow me to repay the debt over six months at £204 per month.

We struggled but we did manage to pay three payments before we fell behind on our mortgage as we did not have enough money to pay both, we missed a payment in December and the matter was referred to a collection Bailiff. Equita now refuse to discuss the issue with me and the council refuse to discuss the issue with me.

 

I have been informed by the bailiff that even though he hasn't visited my house he has added £180 to the bill, after researching bailiff law I have found that this is illegal, there are statuary fees in place for bailiff fees set by the government, starting at 12.5% of the first £100 and going up, it can be researched on the net.

These fees are only applicable after the first visit where access is not made.

I am more than willing to pay the debt as stated but will not be held to ransom by a company employed by yourselves who are acting illegally and exploiting people who are most at need. I can only guess at the number of people who have through fear and ignorance has had to pay these illegal fees and request that you investigate this matter with Equita direct.

I can assure you that with a simple search of the internet regarding Equita and there method of operations you may come across their questionable or illegal way of dealing with people is this really a company which you choose to represent Salford.

My question is what do I do now, I am willing to pay off the debt but not to a bailiff who imposes illegal fees, do you as a council condone or are aware of this practice, ant help would be appreciated.

It is my intention to forward this email to a selection of local councillor’s and the local Salford Advertiser and await your responses.

Many thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweed, please don't take this the wrong way mate, I know you're hacked off about it, but don't write any more letters like that - it could easily prove counter productive.

 

Keep all letters business like and to the point, and always polite - even if you are accusing the bailiffs or the council of dishonesty

 

Use the template letters, they'll make your job a lot easier, and quote the relevant legislation - always try to sound reasonable - in the event you have to make a form 4 complaint to a court the judge is more likely to listen to what you have to say

Link to post
Share on other sites

whwn i rang to pay equita it refers you to the bailiff, gives his name and number , i spoke to him and asked him to clarify the outstanding debt , he informed me then it was my debt of 612 plus 180 fees, he hasn't visited yet but says he is coming with a van today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is your first visit by the bailiffs, and they have never entered your property or levied on your car then the most they can add is £24.50. A bailiff can only charge for 2 visits, £24.50 for the 1st and £18 for the 2nd. So long as they never gain entry or levy on anything then can add no more.

 

The charges that a bailiff can add whilst collecting council tax are laid down in law.

 

As you may or may not be aware, a bailiff has no more rights to enter your property than me. However they can gain entry through an open window/door etc. Never open the door to the bailiff otherwise they may stick their foot in it to prevent you from closing it.

 

Never sign anything a bailiff gives you.

 

Move your car away from your property, or sell or give it away to a family member for a pound, but make sure you change the paperwork aswell etc.

 

Eventually if the bailiff can not gain entry he will return the account back to the council.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

whwn i rang to pay equita it refers you to the bailiff, gives his name and number , i spoke to him and asked him to clarify the outstanding debt , he informed me then it was my debt of 612 plus 180 fees, he hasn't visited yet but says he is coming with a van today.

 

DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR TO ANYONE TODAY.

 

IF YOU HAVE KIDS DO NOT LET THEM NEAR FRONT DOOR TODAY

 

If family member returns home, MAKE SURE THEY ARE NOT 'TAILGATED'

 

When you go out, make sure the 'coast is clear'

 

This can still be sorted out, but once a Bailiff gains entry, he / she can return any time subsequently, and gain posession by any means and that includes breaking in !!!!

 

YOU ARE NOT OBLIGED TO LET HIM / HER IN.

 

Legally, they cannot force their way past you, but i'd prefer not to argue that one in court. JUST LOCK WINDOWS AND DOORS, AND SPEAK WITH ANY CALLERS THROUGH THE LETTERBOX.

 

Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also

 

Be prepared for if the Bailiff does actually call. Have a recorder / dictaphone / video cam next to the door.

 

If he / she knocks, start recording, tell him that you are recording, and tell him that you are not opening the door. If you do open your mouth after that, be very careful.

 

Make sure your back door is covered too. You may find there are two of them.

 

You have to take control of this IN WRITING.

 

Good luck, Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

He can charge a visit fee of £24.50 for "attending to levy" (where no levy was made) ie: you were not at home and he can charge a second visit fee of £18.00 also for the same thing.

 

IF HOWEVER he is able to levy on goods which he will then list on a walking possession then he cannot charge a visit fee as well.

 

If he has then levied on goods and provided you with documentary evidence and you then do not pay........he can then return to your home to REMOVE the goods listed. For this he can charge an "Attending to Remove" fee. This is what this bailiff is now trying to do.....

 

As you can see by this (hopefully) simple explanation ....this bailiff has missed the bit where he needs to first levy on goods !!!!....or hopes that you do not know this !!!!

 

In your case, he can charge just £24.50 for making a first visit. Please do post back after speaking with the bailiff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is your first visit by the bailiffs, and they have never entered your property or levied on your car then the most they can add is £24.50. A bailiff can only charge for 2 visits, £24.50 for the 1st and £18 for the 2nd. So long as they never gain entry or levy on anything then can add no more.

 

The charges that a bailiff can add whilst collecting council tax are laid down in law.

 

As you may or may not be aware, a bailiff has no more rights to enter your property than me. However they can gain entry through an open window/door etc. Never open the door to the bailiff otherwise they may stick their foot in it to prevent you from closing it.

 

Never sign anything a bailiff gives you.

 

Move your car away from your property, or sell or give it away to a family member for a pound, but make sure you change the paperwork aswell etc.

 

Eventually if the bailiff can not gain entry he will return the account back to the council.

 

Excellent. Wise words for this situation.

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you keep doing that, and only communicate in writing - he'll soon get fed up and start leaving you alone.

 

He is like a salesman - he's only paid by results and has lots of leads to follow. So if you seem like a hard nut to crack and give little or no feedback when he calls, he won't bother after a while.

 

I know what I'm talking about - so when he calls, make sure he can't see you, and go into the back and make a nice cuppa and put your feet up.

 

He'll shout all kinds of frightening stuff through your letterbox, he may even bang on your door - let him do that for up to 30 mins if he's really persistant.

 

Then once he's gone, and only if you feel you must, ring him and tell him you'll put everything in writing.

 

Be courteous and polite, BUT FIRM, no matter what he says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff called today and posted a letter it reads

I have attended today with the intention of removing your goods and chattels as are necessary to discharge the outstanding council tax liability order and any additional enforcement costs.

i will re-attend at your address with immediate effect and may remove goods even in your absence. Should you wish to avoid this distressing course of action contact me immediately on the telephone number below to arrange prompt payment.

no contact will be taken as your refusal to pay .

 

also my name is spelt wrong on the letter

any ideas,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just follow all of the advice you have been give, hide car, keep windows/doors closed etc and they will eventually get the message and send the account back to the council.

 

This is a letter that has been posted a few times on the forum...adapt it to suit your needs.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

YOUR COUNCIL appears to have instructed you to recover unpaid council tax from me.

 

This letter gives you notice that you are not being given peaceful entry to my home or to levy goods contained within and I will not be signing anything for you. This notice revokes your eligibility to charge a Walking Possessions fee or other fee relating to the handling of goods.

 

Due to my circumstances I am unable to pay the debt as you demanded because it is unrealistic. I have sent an affordable payment direct to the council along with a written schedule of repayments.

 

Please be advised it is not a "criminal offence" for me to deny a bailiff entry to my property, the law says I have to settle the debt; it does not obligate me to do business with you. If you suggest to me otherwise I will automatically report you to the police and you may receive a criminal record.

 

I AM NOT REFUSING TO PAY THIS DEBT.

 

Meanwhile please provide me with a written breakdown of your fees you have demanded and put it through the letterbox and quietly leave the property. If your fees are found to contradict Regulation 45(2) of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 I will automatically file a Form 4 complaint against you at your certificating court for attempting to defraud me under Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.

 

This document was sent to you recorded delivery to the above address and a copy was sent to HEAD OF council tax Recovery Dept.

 

Please also supply me with a breakdown of the fee's you have charged me

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

Send all letters recorded to the council and bailiffs and makes you keep copies. It will be a good idea to sort out an income and expenditure form and make an offer to the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff called today and posted a letter it reads

 

Was letter in Envelope????

 

I have attended today with the intention of removing your goods and chattels as are necessary to discharge the outstanding council tax liability order and any additional enforcement costs.

i will re-attend at your address with immediate effect and may remove goods even in your absence.

 

Not unless he is ******* houdini he won't !!!(unless of course someone else that lives with you lets him in). If that Bailiff has not been in your house before, then he cannot gain forced entry.

 

Should you wish to avoid this distressing course of action contact me immediately on the telephone number below to arrange prompt payment.

no contact will be taken as your refusal to pay .

 

NO PHONE CALLS. DO NOT RING THIS ******. WRITTEN Correspondence only.

 

also my name is spelt wrong on the letter

any ideas,

 

Hope that helps, Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok getting somewhere,

just had a phonecall of the assistant council tax councillor, she has been asked by the councillor i emailed to look in to my case, she insists i owe the money, i agree, payable at a realistic figure, but has put the collection on hold while she investigates the fees , threat of fees that equita are charging.

Equita now insist i was visited in june last year twice, i deny this , this was the time i agreed a payment plan on the phone if it had been referred to a bailiff they would not have spoken to me.

Equita deny the bailiff told me there were £180 charges applied before visiting , i don't have a recording but i think she believes me and is taking the matter up with them

The most interesting thing is she insists they can keep calling and adding fees when no access or levy is in place, she quotes section 1A of the 1992 statutory instrument "for making a visit to premisis with a view to levying distress (WHETHER THE LEVY IS MADE OR NOT ),

can anybody with a legal background confirm if this is the case or not with reasoning, she also says if they visit with a van, again no levy, they can charge reasonable costs she reckons £150+ is reasonable.

While this issue about visits with no levy may not affect me directly i'd love them to be wrong and have to deal with it, however the advice would have to be spot on,

thank you very much for your help till now

stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes the original 1992 adminstration and enforcement regulations did say that, here is a link to the document:-

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

but thats been updated/amended many times.

 

Tomtubby (resident bailiff expert, who also runs a company that deals with giving out bailiff advice) posted this a while back.

 

BAILIFF FEES FOR COUNCIL TAX

 

Source:

 

The Council Tax Administration & Enforcement (Amendment) 1993. Si 773 amended by Si 295 0f 1998, Si 768 of 2003 and Si 3395 of 2006

 

 

EXPLAINATION

 

First visit fee: £24.50

 

This is for a first attendance to levy but where a levydoes not takes place. (For example where you are not in)

 

The bailiff can charge a levy feeif theylevybut he cannot charge both amounts on the same occasion.

 

Second visit fee: £18.00

 

Despite any further visits, the bailiff can only charge for a maximum of 2 visits.

 

Levy Fee:

 

This is where the bailiff levies on goods and a Walking Possession is signed.

 

Under this heading the bailiff can charge £24.50 for the first £100, and 4% on the next £400 etc. For example: assuming your Council Tax bill is £600, the total amount that you should pay is as follows:

 

First £100 £24.50

Next £400 @ 4% £16.00

Remaining £100 @ 2.5% £ 2.50

Walking Possession Fee £12.00

 

Total £55.00

 

Attendance fee:

 

For one attendance with a vehicle with a view to recover goodsafter the levy has been made under this heading.

 

Contact National Debtline they will give you the same information that I have posted above, same with Citizens advice. The person you spoke to either is trying to pull the wool over your eyes or they havent a clue, I would take the latter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...