Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest/robinson way


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i have 8 diferent debts and i dont know where to start ive offered to pay money off them but they expect me to pay what i havent got! 1st debt (is 4years old),Natwest which is £524.24 thats with robinson way ive said to them that i will pay £150 plus one bank charge but i'm not paying anymore because it's all just bank charge's but they wont listen to me and ring me sometimes up to 13times aday! I have been with natwest sincei as 8years oldwhnmy mum opend a acount for me and as i got older i took the accoun in to my name, at first all i hd as a solo account butthen they said i coud have a overdaft hich i said ys and it started of at £50 but then it go put up to £150andbuy thatpoint i as living on it i couln't afrod to put it down or i would be less off at the end of the month, but it got to the point where when i did get paid they where charging me loads even when i wasn't using the over daft, so i chaged banks and told them i would pay the over daft but they were havin none of it and now it has gone to robinson way and i on't know what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would be inclined to CCA the DCA's that have your debts first, check they HAVE the correct paperwork.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are going to need to attack this problem stage by stage to stop it getting any further out of hand.

 

1) Get your paprework organized as you are going to be bombarded with pieces of paper. Ideally, get a filing system where you can keep paper relating to each alleged debt separate from the others.

 

2) If you haven't already done so, straighten out your banking arrangements. Make sure your current income is paid into an account with no ties to any group you have had problems with in the past. Do not set up direct debits and do not give out your debit card details. If these security breaches have already occurred, nuke the account and get a new one as soon as you can.

 

3) Decide how you are going to deal with the nuisance calls. There are many options here, depending on your needs and budget. Many people continue to receive the nuisance calls so that they can make a log and report it to the relevant authorities. The authorities will, of course, do nothing anyway. If you do answer the calls, either follow the procedure laid down in the BT Phone Book for dealing with nuisance callers, or just say "In Writing Only".

 

If you don't want to have to put up with this abuse then there are ways of stopping it. The crude but effective answer is to remove the plug from the wall, or you can get one of the cheap telephones which alow you to turn the ringer off. If you are prepared to pay a small monthly subscription, you can use Skype to make proper calls and disable your landline, as I posted about here -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/99376-telephone-harassment-action-plan-2.html#post1770207

 

Finally, for a one off payment of £125, you can invest in the best technology on the market, the trueCall, which will give you control of your telephone again.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/announcement.php?f=167&a=143

 

4) Assuming that all of the alleged debts are ones which you recognize, and are not statute barred, you should send a CCA request letter to the current owner of each loan and credit card account, and a SAR to the original creditor for overdrafts. This will allow you to claim back any unlawful charges on the account.

 

Only when the replies to these letters come in, or fail to come in after 12+2 days, will you really know what to do next in each case. The 12+2 days only applies to the CCA requests, not the SAR. That one is forty days.

 

This is how you begin to take control of the situation.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, for a one off payment of £125, you can invest in the best technology on the market, the trueCall, which will give you control of your telephone again.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/announcement.php?f=167&a=143

 

 

The current offer is even better then that. If you buy the basic trueCall unit for £97.50 then CAG will send you the call recorder part for free.

1. email [email protected] advising that you are planning on purchasing a trueCall unit.

2. Purchase the unit online at trueCall - your nuisance call blocker

3. When the unit arrives then email CAG as above with the serial number. You'll need to give them your name and address as well so they can send the call recorder to you.

 

Got mine last week.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...