Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southern Rail taking me to court!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5586 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

Back in October, I was on my way into work as normal. Slightly rushed.

 

Hopped onto the train as normal, and as I was almost at London Bridge, an Revenue Protection person came around. I reached into my back pocket where I always keep my rail pass. Unfortunately, my hand came out with some old tickets from the weekend. Was in such a rush in the morning that I forgot that I swapped trousers. My pass was in the other pair :(

 

Anway, I explained this to the lady and she issued me with a Witness Statement thing and said I had 14 days to send them a copy of Rail pass. She asked if I was avoiding the fair. I said no, I already had a pass, but forgot it, and anyway, to get out at my stop I was intending to use a credit card to purchase a ticket to get again.

 

This is where problem one occurs. I signed the form, I only gave it a cursory glance. Stupidly I was expecting her to write down the correct information. On it, it says I was trying to avoid paying the fair. She also never said I could bring it up with the Independant Fine people (or whatever they are called! :) )

 

By the end of the week, I had sent a copy of my rail pass off to their offices in Croydon, to the address I was given. Second problem, I didn't send it registered.

 

I never heard anything again, so thought all was good. I went on vacation and on my return I moved out of my mums house to a flat elsewhere.

 

A week and a bit ago, I went back home to see her and there was a brown envelope. I was being summoned to court and asked to pay £105. This was news to me. I called them up, and they said that they sent me a letter before the summons. I cant remember what it was supposed to have contained, but suffice to say, it never turned up. I asked if they received my letter and they said they didn't.

 

I am being given the option of pleading guilty and not being there, pleading guilty and appearing, or pleading not guilty. The evidence they have against me is circumstantial, admittedly I was stupid to not read properly, but I assumed that what I was telling the woman was being copied down faithfully.

 

I have been taking that train for over two years now, I have a full time job and have never tried to avoid paying a fair!! It is so irritating.

Sorry for the essay.

 

Any ideas on what I should do? Help please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and sorry it's taken so long for you to get a reply.

 

Common sense would dictate that you at least have 'mitigating circumstances' but we all know how far common sense goes in a court room.

 

My reply will bump you up to the top of the forum, so hopefully someone who can really help will be along soon.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will have to plead not guilty and go to court with your pass that you forgot and explain all the circumstances. they cant fine you avoiding payment if you have already payed for a pass! or send a copy to them again, this time registered or fax email a copy to save time. No point in them continuing if they will not get anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd advise going to court and showing them the letter you sent and your pass, they really do take liberties sometimes, I know somebody who refused to sign the form as there was nothing written on it, they were told 'I'll fill it in later' they replied 'I'll sign it later'. The police were called and when they turned up they had located their missing pass, shown it to them and asked for the revenue protection person to be reminded of the CORRECT law in signing blank witness statements. Needless to say this didn't make the papers as it could have caused a stir.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe they have to prove you had the intention of avoiding payment. Which you clearly didnt.

Which byelaw are you being summonsed under?

 

I would strongly advise you to send a letter via recorded delivery, stating you forgot your pass.

You did not try to avoid the fare

As requested you sent your valid pass to the relevant people

You did not recieve the last letter from them.

The inspector did not accurately write the statement, correct it.

Offer to pay the £20 penalty fair.

Why did you sign something you didnt read??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Failing to produce ticket or pay fare on request

STARTING POINT Band A fine

RANGE Conditional discharge to band

B fine

 

you would also recieve a criminal record,i would try and sort it out of court and put it down to experience,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I believe they have to prove you had the intention of avoiding payment. Which you clearly didnt.

Which byelaw are you being summonsed under?

 

I would strongly advise you to send a letter via recorded delivery, stating you forgot your pass.

You did not try to avoid the fare

As requested you sent your valid pass to the relevant people

You did not recieve the last letter from them.

The inspector did not accurately write the statement, correct it.

Offer to pay the £20 penalty fair.

Why did you sign something you didnt read??

 

I know that this information is obviously given in good faith by Daniel9878, but the key point is wrong.

 

Depending on what you are being charged with, they do NOT need to prove you had the intention of avoiding the fare.

 

If you have been charged with avoiding the fare, that is exactly what it will say on the summons. That will be an offence under the Regulation of Railways Act and in that case they do have to prove the intention was not to pay.

 

If you have been charged with a byelaw offence that is different. The offence is of failing to carry a ticket under the rules in force. Unfortunately they do not need to prove you intended to avoid the fare. All they have to do is show that you were there and did not show a valid ticket when you were checked in line with the rules.

 

If you still have the actual pass you could plead not guilty and go to the court hoping they would see your viewpoint, but that would not stop the court finding you guilty of the offence. They might impose a conditional discharge and no costs, but I would not bet on it.

 

The good advice that you have been given is to try to sort it out of court.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I do have to say you were extemely foolish to sign what amounts to a written confession without reading it.

To be fair, you're not the first person to have dones this and you won't be the last.

The RPI (or equivalent) who questioned you was trained to ask certain questions, if you allow yourself to be 'guided' along this route then sign the record as a true statement at the time, then it is highly likely you will be considered for prosection and succesfully prosecuted.

You MUST go to court, not waffle and produce as much relevant information as possible otherwise that signature will damn you, its your only chance frankly.

 

You may have had no intention of avoiding payment (and I believe that as you had a valid railcard at home) BUT you signed a document saying it WAS your intention of avoiding payment by not carrying it!

 

However as old-codja (excellent advice as always -an ex-rpi I shouldnt wonder?) has pointed out they do not need to even prove this they are simply prosecuting you under 'not producing a valid ticket', a lesser offence if this has any comfort.

 

Im my experience (ex RPI-M FGW) you are going to have to be frightfully lucky to have all charges dropped but they will almost certainly be lesser if you attend and argue your case effectively, this all depends on how much you are paid normally -ie how much taking the day off work will cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...