Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car taken yesterday


Su76
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My court hearing is today!! I haven't got a solicitor, or had any legal advice!

I need all the luck in the world:rolleyes:....I will post back later with the outcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy Days!! The judge was not impressed with how VW have handled things, and suspended the rog order upon me making a 1st payment starting yesterday before 4pm. the claimants agent who attended the hearing didnt know where the car was or if it had been sold, the judge said "if the car has been sold then they have to sort something out with us"! the judge also said that the bailiffs acted very badly and its a serious offence and if we wanted to we could make a separate claim for the way we were treated by them!!

 

I phoned the DCA yesterday, to try and make that payment but they wouldn't accept it!! they told me i have to wait for a call from their manager (who wasn't due into the office until 4.30pm) to discuss the matter with him and that he would be able to take a payment from me! I phoned the DCA 6times yesterday only to be told their manager was in a meeting and he would call me before 8pm to which he did NOT!!

 

I was obviously getting suspicious about this, i have just found out from a friend who phoned the auctions were my car was taken too that they have already sold the car back in January!!! At the court hearing on the 5th Jan the judge put a 28 day order on the car that it must not be SOLD!

Edited by Su76
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will ;)

 

I would also like to thank Repoman for all his help! we wouldn't have done this without him!!

Edited by Su76
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been 4days since the hearing and i still haven't got anywhere! The DCA keep ignoring me saying the manager i need to speak to is either in a meeting/on the phone or has stepped out of the office, they keep telling me he will ring me as soon as he is back!! I did briefly speak to him Monday evening and he admitted they had sold the car, he didnt know the exact date the car was sold and that he will be speaking to VW on Tuesday to get that info and will get straight back to me!

 

I phoned the auction's on Tuesday and found out the car was sold on the 16th Jan, so the DCA are in breech of the judges order from the 5th Jan which stated the car was not to be sold within the next 28 days!

 

I have tried to contact the DCA again tonight and surprise surprise the manager is not in the office yet again....13 phone calls later and i have only spoken with the manager once.

 

I am about to seek further legal advice and will keep you posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you send a letter to them pointing out that they have gone against the Court order and the manager will not speak to you and that you will issue a summons against them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well not quite!! I have FINALLY received a call from the DCA with a proposal, either have the remaining balance of £2000 (which is just the interest i owed) outstanding wiped clean, i walk away with no debt & no car (which would mean i have paid £8600 for nothing) Or they replace my car with a £5800 car (the same amount for what they sold my car for) and carry on with the payments as normal Hmmm I think i will look very hard and find a solicitor!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well not quite!! I have FINALLY received a call from the DCA with a proposal, either have the remaining balance of £2000 (which is just the interest i owed) outstanding wiped clean, i walk away with no debt & no car (which would mean i have paid £8600 for nothing) Or they replace my car with a £5800 car (the same amount for what they sold my car for) and carry on with the payments as normal Hmmm I think i will look very hard and find a solicitor!!

 

Very clear cut, they need to pay you £8600 at the very least, and call it quits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well not quite!! I have FINALLY received a call from the DCA with a proposal, either have the remaining balance of £2000 (which is just the interest i owed) outstanding wiped clean, i walk away with no debt & no car (which would mean i have paid £8600 for nothing) Or they replace my car with a £5800 car (the same amount for what they sold my car for) and carry on with the payments as normal Hmmm I think i will look very hard and find a solicitor!!

 

 

My personal view here would be to go for the second option, but demand damages for the 2 and a bit months that they have had the car off you. For bus / taxi fees, extra time spent travelling, phone costs where they refused to return the vehicle, court costs for the hearings, etc. I'm sure that would come to near enough £2000...

 

Obviously wait for someone with more know than me to give other suggestions though :p

 

Thanks,

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Su

 

Sorry been so quiet - it's gone a bit busy work wise.

 

My initial reaction is that the lender will bend over backwards now to accomodate you. They have blatently gone against a court order, which is I believe contempt of court.

 

Have VW Finance put anything in writing to you? I think this matter needs to be sorted in a court - mainly because you have a good case I think and also because VW have acted completely improperly which will somewhat go against them.

 

Have PM'd you.

 

Hope all is well otherwise.

 

RM

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been thinking of how long the whole process of going to court etc and dont fancy it at all, im really desperate for transport now!!

 

I might phone the DCA tomorrow and suggest if the car they are proposing to give me is to the exact same spec mileage/sports/year etc then i will go ahead with it!!

 

Can anybody give any advice??:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to ring the DCA manager to accept their offer of them replacing my car (but under my terms of same spec car) and they are ignoring me yet again!! i have been waiting on his call for 2 days now :confused:

 

I really dont know were i am going with this:( if i am entitled to every penny back then i would be happy to settle with that!

 

I'm not sure on how demanding i can be with this, i dont want to get too cocky with the DCA :confused:

 

Any advice appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give him till end of business tomorrow, and then I would get cocky, in the nicest possible way. At the very least you are entitled to what you are asking, and I'm sure they would not relish explaining to a Court that despite an order to the contrary they flogged the car! If no joy by 5.30 tomorrow drop a line on here - will give me some weekend reading to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just called the DCA and again he's not available apparently he's on holiday until Mon and has been for the last 2 days :confused: hmmm.... ive been expecting his calls for the last 2days!!

 

I left a message with his colleague saying

"that i have an appointment with my solicitor on Monday, and stated the fact that my solicitor will probably suggest i take it back to court......and that before i speak with my solicitor i would like to suggest that if i was to receive £8600 back, i would be happy with settling out of court.

 

Is this okay :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been calling the DCA all week now and the manager is never available or never returns my calls!!

 

I'm banging my head against a brick wall with this one i think, i am sooooo desperate for transport now! and have no idea what my next steps are :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been calling the DCA all week now and the manager is never available or never returns my calls!!

 

I'm banging my head against a brick wall with this one i think, i am sooooo desperate for transport now! and have no idea what my next steps are :(

 

Hi Su

 

I'd seriously try to get hold of his manager, and tell him that you will now escalate the problem back to the Court and let the Judge decide how best to play it unless it is dealt with today.

 

If you need a hand give me a shout.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Su,

 

update your thread with your PM to me.

 

SECTION 90

 

Further restriction of remedies for default

90.—(1) At any time when—

(a) the debtor is in breach of a regulated hire-purchase or a regulated conditional

sale agreement relating to goods, and

(b) the debtor has paid to the creditor one-third or more of the total price of the

goods, and

© the property in the goods remains in the creditor,

the creditor is not entitled to recover possession of the goods from the debtor except

on an order of the court.

(2) Where under a hire-purchase or conditional sale agreement the creditor is required

to carry out any installation and the agreement specifies, as part of the total price, the

amount to be paid in respect of the installation (the " installation charge") the

reference in subsection (l!(b) to one third of the total price shall be construed as a

reference to the aggregate of the installation charge and one third of the remainder of

the total price.

53

(3) In a case where—

(a) subsection (l)(a) is satisfied, but not subsection (l)(b), and

(b) subsection (l)(b) was satisfied on a previous occasion in relation to an

earlier agreement, being a regulated hire-purchase or regulated conditional sale

agreement, between the same parties, and relating to any of the goods

comprised in the later agreement (whether or not other goods were also

included), subsection (1) shall apply to the later agreement with the omission

of paragraph (b).

(4) If the later agreement is a modifying agreement, subsection (3) shall apply

with the substitution, for the second reference to the later agreement, of a reference to

the modifying agreement.

(5) Subsection (1) shall not apply, or shall cease to apply, to an agreement if the debtor

has terminated, or terminates, the agreement.

(6) Where subsection (1) applies to an agreement at the death of the debtor, it

shall continue to apply (in relation to the possessor of the goods) until the grant of

probate or administration, or (in Scotland) confirmation (on which the personal

representative would fall to be treated as the debtor).

(7) Goods falling within this section are in this Act referred to as " protected goods".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...