Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Connaught/Worst Cretins


stabradop
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4634 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Excuse me for tagging onto this thread.

A friend of mine got a letter from connaught stating they were going to make him insolvent because he owed them a shade over £2000.

 

In total he's got about £11k worth of debt but all creditors have accepted token payments, except connaught.

 

He's been down to the local court and file his affidavit (did this before he spoke to me) so has acknowledged the debt, I think. Spoke to him at the weekend and he says he has a court date for 6th July to see if he's going to be made bankrupt or not.

 

Does this sound right to anyone?

Bankruput him over a £2k debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excuse me for tagging onto this thread.

A friend of mine got a letter from connaught stating they were going to make him insolvent because he owed them a shade over £2000.

 

In total he's got about £11k worth of debt but all creditors have accepted token payments, except connaught.

 

He's been down to the local court and file his affidavit (did this before he spoke to me) so has acknowledged the debt, I think. Spoke to him at the weekend and he says he has a court date for 6th July to see if he's going to be made bankrupt or not.

 

Does this sound right to anyone?

Bankruput him over a £2k debt?

 

anything over 750 quid

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your freind has that amount of debt that he can't realistically pay and has no assets it may be worth considering someone making him BR as this would save him the fees.

 

He's a self employed builder, so at the moment he can't pay. However he's certainly not hiding and is making token offers. However the guy at connaught was incredibly rude and basically said he didn't give a sh*t

 

it'll never happen,

Tell your friend to go for costs when they dont turn up at court

 

You that confident they won't turn up?

What happens in the long run if they don't, can they try again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a self employed builder, so at the moment he can't pay. However he's certainly not hiding and is making token offers. However the guy at connaught was incredibly rude and basically said he didn't give a sh*t

 

 

 

You that confident they won't turn up?

What happens in the long run if they don't, can they try again?

 

 

Yes I am that confident that they wont turn up, they abuse the system with complete impunity and on the balance of it probably scare more people into paying with their threats of bankruptcy. the few who arent scare represent a small outlay compared to the profits they make.

 

If this threat of theirs doesn't work and they have to pursue the matter through court then they would have to fork out dosh to declare someone bankrupt and then they would get nothing at all, as the bankrupt would simply include this debt in the bankruptcy.

 

It's an absolutely ludicrous system and your friend should use the same system against them - if they try again, then not only do you defend again - and go for costs again, but you use the fact that they are repeatedly harrassing your friend. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, it will certainly go a ways to putting his mind at ease.

 

Out of interest, how does he go about claiming costs and what would be acceptable?

 

**Edit** Spoke to him again this morning to confirm something and it's a petition for bankrupcy that he's been served with. Has a court date of July 6th.

 

One of his main concerns is losing his house. We're not sure how much equity, if any, he has but I've suggested he gets it valued ASAP to be certain. With a wife and 3 kids to support he's a little worried about it all.

Edited by lsba02853
Addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just phoned them. Told them that their CCA time ran out at the beginning of the year, advised them that both they and 1st Gimps have both told me that they have no paper. Was told that it will be referred back to 1st Gimps again. When will these idiots leave me alone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't believe it! Got a text message from Conartists reiterating the contents of the above mentioned letter. First time they have tried phone contact, albeit by text. Beginning to get a tad annoyed now.

 

Any advice on action to take please? They know that they cannot legally pursue me but are going on anyway. A visit to their office perhaps....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok further update.

 

 

Just had a call from 1st Credit, they have a new tactic now of ringing your mobile and if you answer you have to press 1 and get through to someone, that's when I found out it was.

 

1st Credit now say that they have a copy of the agreement which they are going to send to me. Now bearing in mind I CCA'd them back in December via Connaught and both parties said that they did not have an agreement so they are well beyond their time limits.

 

Does anyone have any idea what to do next? If the agreement has the fake signature that was on my CCA letter I have them by the danglies, but if it doesn't then I am unsure on how to proceed.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had this through the door, bit of a laugh as the monkey who I spoke to yesterday said that she had an agreement in front of her but hasn't sent it along with this, she also tried to get me to confirm my address as well, which is a bit daft as they have just written to me. I attach a scanned and edited copy.

 

Any comments?

 

Ta in advance

1stcdtltr9octrecd16edited.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...