Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help needed with Tesco car insurance


AY1000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just had a car written off and Tesco have valued the car at £600 but they have taken out about £540 to be paid towards the rest of the year or for me to continue with the policy without the car been present. Furthermore they have taken from my account nearly £200 towards paying the cover till next year. So in all my car is been written off for £600 but they have taken £740 for the policy and I am in the red for £140.

 

Policy = 740 regards of car or not

Value for car = 600

 

Total Loss to me = £140

 

When I spoke to Tesco they are saying I could buy another car and STILL carryon with the policy regardless untill next year. Is this right?

 

I have asked for confirmation of this and wish to complain or take a legal action. Can legal action be justified?

I have won against Abbey, now bring on Barclaycard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to add another car on to the policy. However, they could charge an Additional Premium. If you are unable to get a car immediately, it might be best trying to pay the claim off, withdrawing the claim (and not losing any no claims bonus) and not pay the premiums.

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone

 

But no I have not got any accesd at all, mine is £0. Furthermore I have no other car so they are telling me to keep the policy for the rest of year, regardless of my situation (carless or not). What can I do to get my unused premium?

I have won against Abbey, now bring on Barclaycard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I would do. Ask them to withdraw the claim, and cancel the policy from the earliest available opportunity.

 

You have said that your insurance renewal is next year. This means that you will get a proportion of the premiums back.

 

You will get nothing for the car, and as the Policy is cancelled mid term you will get no extra NCD, however, I think that this will be the best for you. Before they do this, ask them how much you are going to get this way to make sure it is the best for you (but it cannot be worse than the -£140 you are in at the moment.)

 

Also you mentioned that they have taken extra money out of your account - I trust this is by DD. Were you informed more than 14 days in advance that they were taking an extra payment - if not get onto your bank, as they have broken the terms of the DD guarantee, and the bank should refund you the money for the extra payment.

 

Let me know how you get on

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

AY1000

 

Have been reading this thread & trying to get my head round what Tesco have done.

 

Your car was written off - was a third party involved & if so who was deemed at fault.

 

If no other person involved & you wrote the car off, the insurer would offer you the market value of the vehicle less the excess. Did the make an offer & did you accept ?

 

It is a while since I dealt with personal lines insurance ( commercial now ) but in the event an offer is accepted then providing to finance on a write off then the insurer should pay direct to you irrespective whether you are paying by instalments or not. However if a claim is made against the policy, the full annual premium is payable however you can/should be able to add another vehicle.

 

Unless there is something in the policy wording that states that any AD payment made to you will be used to offset any outstanding instalments, the action they have therefore taken is incorrect.

 

If you provide further detail of the policy and circumstances of the claim, I may be able to assist further.

 

Ironically Tesco is Underwritten by UK Insurance who have many schemes & are ultilmately owned by one of our friendly banks - RBS !! :eek:

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
AY1000

 

Hi Gary

 

The policy can be seen in

 

Car insurance: Policy documents - Tesco Personal Finance

 

and it appears if a claim is made on the account then this is taken into account and I have been offered only £57 in cheque and whilst I have lost my car value for the premium.

 

a- I have bought the policy for about £750 (£62 a month)

b- I have made a claim for my car

c- was written off and valued at £600

d- I was given £57 whilst losing the entire additonal £140

e- So I have lost about £100 from the deal but apparently must keep the policy running or cancel at no refund.

 

I am confused with the hold thing.

I have won against Abbey, now bring on Barclaycard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thare appears to be nothing in the policy that states they will offset any value against the instalment agreement. Albeit, if a claim is made against the policy you must pay it in full by the agreed method. If you had your £600+ from them you may get another vehicle and add it to the policy.

 

I would write & complain as the do appear to have withheld your money to offset an agreement.

 

It's worth a try.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco are a nightmare. My OH's car was written off by a woman pulling out right in front of him. This was September last year, and it's still ongoing. She admitted fault at the scene but later changed her story (she's also changed her statement several times and lied, speculated, insinuated and exaggerated). Tesco assigned us the laziest bunch of solicitors known to man, who, after dragging their heels for nine months making us do all the work (no advice over statements, pictures, damage, never answering the phone or always being 'in a meeting', screwing up the engineer inspection, telling us to get rid of the car when it was still needed...) are now recommending we accept 50/50 liability. This'll obliterate OH's no claims bonus, bringing the insurance up by £300pa.

OH got on the phone to Tesco Insurance 'Customer Service' today and was spoken to extremely rudely, dismissed out of hand and told he could complain 'if he could be bothered'.

I hate supermarket insurers. Especially Tesco.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...