Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
    • Well yes, ... and the tax dodgers ... Trump May Owe $100 Million From Double-Dip Tax Breaks, Audit Shows A previously unknown focus of an I.R.S. audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on a Chicago skyscraper. nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aktiv Kapital Chasing me for a debt that is not mine


jobmid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5293 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got this letter from Aktiv Capital but I have never held an account with barclays. Do you think they made a mistake they must be looking for someone else as I have never banked with Barclays.

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: Agreement Number: ............ Barclays Bank Pic

 

We write to advise you that Aktiv Kapital First Investment Limited has bought the interest of Barclays Bank Pic in the debt that you owe them under the above Agreement.

 

We are acting as Collection Agent on behalf of Aktiv Kapital First Investment Limited which is now the legal owner of the outstanding balance on your account.

 

Our records show the total balance outstanding, inclusive of all accrued interest, amounts to .£ 165.62.

 

You should not send any further payments to Barclays Bank Pic and, if you have a Direct Debit or Standing Order arrangement in favour of Barclays Bank Pic that should be cancelled.

 

All future payments should be sent to this company at the address shown. Cheques must be made payable to Aktiv Kapital (UK) Limited. If for any reason you are unable to pay the full balance immediately, you should contact us as soon as possible to discuss payment arrangements.

 

We look forward to receiving your prompt payment. If you wish to speak to us, our telephone number is clearly shown on this letter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Aktiv Kapital (UK) Limited

 

Thames Credit Limited is part of the Aktiv Kapital Group and is now operating under the banner of Aktiv Kapital (UK) Limited.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send them the following via recorded delivery.

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name). For the avoidance of doubt I have never held an account with Barclays Bank Plc.

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question. I would also point out that this would be considered an unfair business practice under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

Please also be aware that if any adverse entries have been made on my credit file in relation to this account legal action will be taken against you and appropraite damages sought.

 

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Print do not sign name.

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

recived a reply from Aktiv Krap today and they are asking me to call them

 

 

I have no intension of calling them this debt is not mine I never had any dealings with barclays should i just resend them my orignal letter the rory provided or is there something else i should do?

Edited by jobmid
removed image too big
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now why would anyone want to phone just to be bullied etc?

 

Write back saying all communication is to be in writing and unless they provide evidence of any alleged debt, further correspondence will not receive a response.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is what i am going to reply with:

 

Dear Sir or Madam.

 

Thank you for your reply dated December 18 2008 which have been noted.

 

Once again I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (Barclays Bank Plc). For the avoidance of doubt I have never held an account with Barclays Bank Plc.

 

I would also like to point out I have no intension in calling you on this matter and all correspondence will be in writing only.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question. I would also point out that this would be considered an unfair business practice under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I would like to advise you that I have sent a copy of all correspondence between yourselves and myself to the Office of Fair Trading and have opened a formal complaint with them.

 

I would now like to make this an official complaint and I request a copy of your official complaints procedure as you have now breached the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. I am also going to bill you for my time spent on this as I my time is very valuable and my hourly rate is £35 plus vat.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

Please also be aware that if any adverse entries have been made on my credit file in relation to this account legal action will be taken against you and appropriate damages sought.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Should this do the trick? or do i need to add anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

These guys are really starting to anoy me

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: Agreement Number: 123456789 Barclays Bank Plc Outstanding Balance: £ xxx.xx

 

Further to your recent correspondence in connection with the above referenced matter.

 

We are endeavouring to resolve the issue that you have raised, but require further information from you in order to do so.

 

Without your assistance, we will not be able to resolve this matter as efficiently as either of us would wish.

 

We would therefore request that you contact our specialist team on the freephone number, who will be able to assist in resolving this matter.

 

We look forward to receiving your response as soon as possible, so please telephone us on 0800 111 4014.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

--------------- -- --- - - --

 

Aktiv Kapital (UK) limited

 

Any ideas how to get rid of these trolls as they seem incapable of reading english.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them this:-

 

 

 

Dear sir or madam.

 

I am rather bemused as to why you are still writing to me.

Having received your letter dated (date), in which you request that i contact you by telephone to provide information to yourselves in regards to this matter.

Please note that i have no intention of contacting you by telephone, as i do not discuss such matters by telephone.

 

I have informed you several times now that I have never had an account, or indeed any dealings with Barclays with regard to financial matters, so therefore i do not understand why you are attempting to force me to give you personal information.

You should note that under OFT debt collection guidelines, the burden of proof of your right to contact me with regards to the collection of this alleged debt is on you, and thus far you have not provided me with ANY proof of debt, or your right to collect on it.

 

Should you wish to receive further information ,i will only provide it if the request for what you want is made in writing, and once i have perused your request i will decide what information i wish to reveal to you, as you obviously have very little information on this matter, and are attempting to force me to "fill in the gaps" for you, so to speak.

If you are not prepared to make the request in writing, then you should be warned that under section 40 of the administration of justice act 1970, you are committing a criminal offence, and thus i am well within my rights to lodge a formal complaint with the police, the office of fair trading, Trading standards, the financial ombudsman service and the information commissioners office.

 

If conclusive proof that I am obliged to pay this amount to you is not forthcoming within 14 days, i will take whatever steps i deem necessary to stop your harassment of me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or even..

 

Dear Sirs

 

Acc. No xxxxxx

 

Your unprofessional attitude has left me speechless

 

Yours

 

I have also had the "please phone us" letter from Aktiv Krapital. I think all letters they receive are filed under "bin".

 

Seriously though, send the letter godpikachu advised and maybe complain to the OFT. I have sent mine, and the more people that complain, the better. The complaint form is on the OFT website (haven't got a link, sorry).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or even..

 

Dear Sirs

 

Acc. No xxxxxx

 

Your unprofessional attitude has left me speechless

 

Yours

 

I have also had the "please phone us" letter from Aktiv Krapital. I think all letters they receive are filed under "bin".

 

Seriously though, send the letter godpikachu advised and maybe complain to the OFT. I have sent mine, and the more people that complain, the better. The complaint form is on the OFT website (haven't got a link, sorry).

Well the clock is ticking on this one will be going to the FSO in a few weeks if they continue to bin my letters. I think these norwegain trolls dont understand english my next letter will be in norwegain for them as I do speak it wonder what they will make of it.:twisted:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Dear Sir

 

Barclays Bank Pic - Agreement Number:

 

We refer to your letters dated 29 December 2008 and 2 January 2009.

 

You have requested that we provide you with proof of this debt and that you are the debtor.

 

Because you have informed us that you have no knowledge of this debt and that you have never held an account with Barclays Bank Pic, we have previously written to you requesting you to call us in order that we may obtain certain information from you. As previously advised, the information is required in order to assist us in complying with your request.

 

In view of your claim that you have never held an account with Barclays Bank Pic, we need to be absolutely sure that the above account is indeed your account before sending you any documents in respect of this account, otherwise we would be in breach of the Data Protection Act.

 

However, in view of the small outstanding balance, and as it would be necessary for us to obtain the requested documentation from Barclays Bank Pic, we have taken a business decision to write off this account.

 

We confirm that this matter is now closed and that you will therefore hear nothing further from us with regard to the above account.

 

Nevertheless, a copy of our leaflet setting out our Complaints Procedure is enclosed as requested, together with a copy of the leaflet issued by the Financial Ombudsman Service, entitled 'your complaint and the ombudsman', should you wish to pursue this matter further .

 

• UIIY

 

Malcolm Meadows Complaints Department Aktiv Kapital (UK) Limited

 

Thames Credit Limited is part of the Aktiv Kapital Group and is now operating under the banner of Aktiv Kapital (UK) Limited.

 

 

well looks like they have trowen the towel in silly buggers now they will go chase someone else i bet who has the same name as myself

Link to post
Share on other sites

what they are really saying is...

 

 

dear clever a***

 

ok, ok, we dont have proof that your are the debtor, and its obvious you arent going to fall for any of our usual tripe either, so it looks like we have been sold a lemon on his occasion.

 

But just wait, you just wait and see what we do if any more stuff comes our way with your name on it, youll pay us then, by god youll pay...

 

DAMN YOU!, YOU'LL DIE BY DROWNING AND BEAR NO CHILDREN!

 

 

Aktiv crapital = OWNED :D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I would not only folow this up with a letter to acknowledge the fact that they have no basis under which this matter could be persued further, but send them an invoice for my time and effort in dealing with such rubbish.

 

The OFT are quite clear that a DCA must show evidence that the person they are contacting is the debtor and that they are not just taking pot luck that a person with a similar name will accept responsibility for a debt they previously knew nothing about.

 

To have continued the contact is stupid of them, so I would be quite happy in asking them to compensate me for the inconvenience.

 

Then again, if they can get away with sending out thousands of similar letters, where some people will probably pay a small amount rather than dispute it at all, they could be raking it in...!

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, easy:-

 

 

Dear Malcolm Meadows

 

Re:- (ref number)

 

Thank you for your letter dated (date), in which you state you will no longer be harrassing me over a debt which was obviously not mine.

 

I will be making an official complaint about you to the OFT and the financial ombudsman, as you have quite clearly breached industry regulations by not thoroughly researching the matter and approaching me without knowing 100% wether i was the debtor or not, in the hopes that i would simply pay you without question. Maybe in the future oyu will think twice befor eunderestimating peoples knowledge of the law.

 

As i have had to put up with your attempts to extract money and sensitive information from me, neither of which you are entitled to, i now invoice you for recompense of monies for taking up my time, a breakdown of charges as follows:-

 

(number)x letters sent @ £10 each = £x

Time spent researching rights & regulations:- 5 hours x £10 p/h = £50

 

Total owed = £xx

 

I expect this amount to be recompensed within 28 days by cheque made out to me, failure to do so may result in furthur action being taken against you.

 

Yours

(print name dont sign)

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just write to them and ask. In the same envelope pop in another note making a complaint to them about their time wasting activities. They have eight weeks to resolve that to your satisfaction. If they don't it goes to the Financial Services Ombudsman. An investigation by him will cost them more than £400. Just keep at them. Its the attitude they take with their clients so take the same with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right got a reply back from aktiv krappy pants they said they are not going to compensate me for wasting my time and money and it looks like they see the issue as closed. I however dont and want to show them the errors of thier ways. Should I now make a complaint to the FOS or start a claim in the small claims court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very similar to my action against Crapital One - see http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/173426-cap-one-get-bashing.html

 

They have been calling 2-3 times day for weeks and I've only just got the calls stopped. However, their action came too late, as I have already sent them a letter before action and invoices for my time and effort in taking the stupid calls, which were never for me.

 

The main part of my argument would be that I have incurred costs in having to write to them, which was over and above what I would have expected from a reasonable company.

 

As such I have issued a charge of £12 per letter sent plus £35 for each individual call that has been taken by myself. These have woken me up on several occasions, during recent illness. The majority of calls were 'silent', in breach of OfCom guidelines. They also refused, point blank, to remove my number, until I got stroppy with them.

 

So, they have a couple of weeks in which to consider my latest letter, clearly marked as a 'letter before action' and instructions to pass it to their legal team. I already have a N1 form part completed, which can be obtained on-line - http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n1_0102.pdf

 

The form is in PDF format, which usually means you have to print it off and fill it in by hand, or be creative in MS Word and make a template that will print over the top - or, be even cleverer and convert the document to Word with this freebie: Free PDF To Word Doc Converter - Free software downloads and reviews - CNET Download.com !

 

Fill in the details, attach a seperate sheet with a diary of events and any documentation to support your claim, like copies of recorded delivery receipts etc.

 

BUT - you can't just pop down to the court tomorrow and take the DCA to the cleaners this way, you HAVE to give them opportunity to rectify the matter under their own complaints procedure. Only when this procedure has been followed would you file in court - not forgetting to add court costs, the court fee for taking the action, your travel costs, time for attending court, time for research into the case - make a list!

 

You can also contact the OFT and FOS to lodge a complaint, the reference number will be useful additions to your claim in court.

 

Until people start to stand up to these idiots and make THEM pay for their stupid activities they will just carry on annoying the hell out of innocent people. Why should YOU have to pay to tell them they got it wrong?

 

You could also leave the matter of 'compensation' to the discretion of the judge, instead of claiming a stated amount - but add a few notes as to what your costs have been still, so the judge does not short change you.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...