Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fingerprinting Children in School....?


NYM
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Not sure if anyone can advise me but, my g/children have to provide their thumb-prints when taking library books from school each week.

 

It's all done just as it would be in a police station. Little electronic pad and logged on the computer system.

 

Their parents haven't been told about this and I like to know if it is general practice now in schools.

 

I don't want to approach the school first without finding out as much as I can about the legalities of it.

 

I've already had to ask the school about some of the h/work that has been set regarding 'surveys' the children are supposed to carry out. Example: Where their parents work, how they get to work, what hours they work and the list goes on....

 

Is anyone able to give me some advice ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek: Thanks for that link...I'm still reading it but it seems that it's 'acceptable' providing the school notify the parents ! I know my daughter hasn't been asked to sign any consent form.

 

Once a month the children bring home the school news-paper about upcoming events and the like and I bet that somewhere in among the several pages of it, there will be a note to tell the parents about the fingerprint implementation along with the dates of the next school disco, hot-dog lunch and PE kit requirements !

 

My other concern was the kind of homework the boys are receiving. It's mainly collecting data about the parents and g/parents. ie. where they work, how they get to work, what hours they work, what type of car(s) do they drive, where do they shop etc....it all seems so 'Big Brother-ish'

 

It seems petty, but I'm getting irritated by the amount of information that they seems to be collecting and I want to know what they do with these homework 'surveys'

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son's school have just started thumbprinting for school dinners. I don't remember any consultation or permission being sought.

 

 

 

I could just about appreciate why they feel the need to identify which child has which book from the school library, but I can't think of any reason to justify finger-printing a child for school dinners. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, some of the reasons given are that there is now no distinction between those who receive free school meals and those who dont, unused money can be carried forward to the next day and parents can specify what type of food the children can have. Apparently, you can even get a weekly printout of what your child has had to eat!

 

Teachers wishing to eat at the school also have to be fingerprinted for the new system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I wouldnt like my sons to bring homework asking these sort of questions, its none of their business.

 

Regarding the fingerprinting it does seem to be a good way to work as kids always lose tickets/vouchers etc so this should be easy for them. The question is how is this data stored and where?

Link to post
Share on other sites

has the school in question been asked why they require this information?

 

 

 

This afternoon I asked one of the other mums (she helps out in the school library) she said that the school have been doing it for about 12 months. It is connected to the schools main computer system but isn't aware of what happens to the childrens fingerprints when they leave that particular school. From reading the link earlier in this thread, apparently, the data should be deleted from the system when they leave the school.

 

My husband doesn't think there is anything sinister about it and has told me that I'm just being paranoid, maybe I am :D but I'm annoyed that the parents haven't been consulted.

 

I'm sure that at 6 and 7 years old the children could be entrusted to have swipe-cards or something similar that could be held by the class teacher and used to take out a book from the library !

 

I think I'll have a word with a few of the other mums before I approach the school. I may just have missed the announcement (if there was one) in the monthly news letter...although I doubt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, i meant in the other matter, my son, who is 5 uses this system in the school library and fwiw, i dont see anything at all sinister in it, it saves on the masses of lost library cards , although there will be those who insist that it is a back door method of obtaining everybodies fingerprints onto some sort of central criminal database. :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got this from the ICO website.

 

...........There is nothing explicit in the Act to require schools to seek consent from all

parents before implementing a fingerprinting application. However, unless

schools can be certain that all children understand the implications of giving their

fingerprints, they must fully involve parents in order to ensure that the information

is obtained fairly. Parents play a central role in their children’s education, in terms

of support and guidance, and also in terms of legal liability, for example in case of

truancy. They therefore rightly expect to be informed and consulted when

biometric systems are introduced in their child’s school. Suspicions are only likely

to be increased when new and possibly controversial technology is introduced

without a comprehensive effort to address people’s fears and concerns.

Schools should explain the reasons for introducing the system, and how personal

data is used and kept safe. In view of the sensitivity of the issue and the

importance of parents’ role in education it would also be a heavy-handed

approach for schools not to respect the wishes of those pupils and parents who

object to school fingerprinting initiatives. This is especially pertinent given the

flexibility of systems such as Junior Librarian, where a card can work just as well

as a fingerprint, so that those who wish to “opt out” can be given another means

of accessing the same services. .............

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be aware that although the fingerprint data may well be held securely by the school in its servers, the DPA does allow exemptions for reasons of law enforcement to allow access to this data.

 

That said, I believe that the fingerprint data held is not sufficiently accurate for Police use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I'm not really that concerned about the fingerprinting, it's more to do with the fact that the parents haven't been consulted. :D

 

 

I'm the kind of person that doesn't get annoyed about CCTV cameras recording my every move when I go shopping, nor getting a ticket for parking where I shouldn't... I like to take responsibility for my own behaviour.

 

What I do object to is the over riding rights of schools and other institutions to introduce something without consultation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there's anything particularly sinister about this either.

 

However, there is a general principle that such data can only be held with the owner's permission. This, by definition, means the person can refuse permission, and should they do so, this does not give the authorities the right to deny them access to services.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi NYM,

I work in electronic security and bio-metric readers are becoming more cost effective (Approx £200 for a good one). I imagine that they were implimented with the thought that kids are likely to lose prox tags or swipe cards.

 

It wouldn't hold any more information than any system that they could have put in place, it's merely a more efficient input device. I suspect that it has set alarm bells off with you purly on the basis "fingerprint" has been mentioned.

 

With total respect and only in my own opinion, i wouldn't expect the school to notify parents of the inplimentation of a swipe card system so why would they with the bio-metric.

 

As for the other "research/homework" you mentioned, i'd tell them to mind there own bloody buisiness:)

 

Just my 2p, and im not being argumentative - just giving another opinion from someone who deals with the stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention. . .

 

Before someone mentions that swipe cards don't hold fingerprint data, neither do the biometric.

 

They "map" your fingerprint and it remebers distinctive charateristics and points. It's not a scan of the fingerprint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, i meant in the other matter, my son, who is 5 uses this system in the school library and fwiw, i dont see anything at all sinister in it, it saves on the masses of lost library cards , although there will be those who insist that it is a back door method of obtaining everybodies fingerprints onto some sort of central criminal database. :-)
Yeah, especially as everyone knows your average petty criminal spends all his spare time in libraries. :-D
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Yeah, especially as everyone knows your average petty criminal spends all his spare time in libraries. :-D

 

And they are usually between 5 and 6 years of age.:)

 

although saying that i am not entirely comfortable with schools holding bio metric information on my children but that si probably purely due to my ignorance of how the whole thing works and how the info is stored and utilised.

 

I would like the chance to decline on my childs behalf if it were to be introduced.

 

I think children need to learn a sense of responsibility and taking care of something as simple as a library card is good practice for them.

 

Not sure what the point of the school asking questions related to parents jobs and cars etc..... What will it really gain them, i would have sent it back blank.

 

I was also curious about the area the school was in?

 

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe a couple of years down the line this will be something else scraped like the sats tests and many DNA samples held by the police.

 

Pompeyfaith

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...