Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mbna, help please,


minnimes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok , well ive had my mbna card for quite afew yrs, not exactly sure when i took it out, i have always been a good payer until about 2yrs ago my hubby had an accident at work which has left him permanently disabled, obviously our income has dropped hugely as we now have to live off benefits as i am also disabled. mbna forced me into a payment plan which i couldnt afford i managed the payments for a while but our mortgage went up and i couldnt afford the payments, i sent them my i/e as drawn up by the cccs. they rejected my i/e and insist they can not take a lower amount. i have continued to make the lower payments. on the 17th i sent them a request for cca and requested all contact to be in writing. today i had a call from them, the woman didnt take me through security, she launched into the regulation speech about wanting more money etc, i answered the call as it was an unknown number and i didnt know it was them. any she carried on and i informed her i have requested my cca, and that i didnt want phone contact and have said to contact me by letter only, she tried to tell me that because im in arrears with my account they can phone me as much as they want!! she was told that i know my rights now, im not so ignorant to the rules and guide lines. this is when i took my opportunity to point out that she failed to take me through security, i could tell she was abit taken back, she then tried to tell me that she doesnt have to complete security because shes on admin? as if that matters! any i then told her i was ending the call. is this right up to now. im just waiting til they default on the cca (hopefuly)

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

She is talking through her posterior.

 

Unless one of the qualifications of being an admin is to have the Psychic power to be able to reliably determine the identity of the person she is speaking to over the telephone, then she is under exactly the same obligations as anyone else to make sure she is talking to the correct person before discussing confidential information.

 

This was nothing more than a nuisance telephone call and should be treated as such.

 

My Advice.

 

Wait for the CCA, if it doesnt arrive on time then send a letter saying that as they are in breach of the CCA the account is now in dispute until such times as they comply. Remind them that non complience is in fact a criminal offence.

 

Also remind them that while the account is in dispute they are legally barred from :

taking payment

harassing you for payment

passing your account onto a DCA

Registering the debt with a credit referencing agency.

adding charges or interest.

 

Unless you want to speak to them for your own enjoyment (see the thread on cheekiness towards a dca) then each time they telephone simply say that you want all contact in writing please.

 

If they continue to telephone - write to them recorded to say please do not contact me by telephone, all contact in writing, and inform them that any telephone calls to you will be recorded in the process of gathering evidence to support your action against them under the Anti Harassment act 1997.

 

Dont let them bully you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply, i stated in my cca request i wanted all contact in writing, maybe i should send a separate letter? to be honest i dont mind the phone calls so much any more now i know my rights a little better. it makes me laugh when you answer the phone and they say "hello, my name? " i say yes then they say , "my name and surname" like im so stupid i wont know who it is, why cant they just ask for you normaly lol.

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

mbna have just phoned me yet again!!, same woman as last time, allison, yet again no security questions. im getting sick off this, they could be talking to anyone about my account. i sent my cca request on the 17th nov, was received by them on the 18th, when will they be in default? and what do i do about it when they are?

Edited by minnimes
:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

mbna have just phoned me yet again!!, same woman as last time, allison, yet again no security questions. im getting sick off this, they could be talking to anyone about my account. i sent my cca request on the 17th nov, was received by them on the 18th, when will they be in default? and what do i do about it when they are?

 

Hi do you have anyway of recording one of these phone calls if you do then complain to the Information Commissioners Office as this is a breach of DPA 1998

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

im not sure, i'll have to have a look at my mobile. can any one tell me when they have not complied with my cca? i know its soon. the woman tried to tell me i have to allow afew weeks after them getting it for them to process it. i thought it was 12 days, its not fault if they dont process their paper work in time.

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 working days from receipt of request if you only have proof of posting then 12+2 working days they are then in default and should not enforce agreement though we know that MBNA totally ignore the law unless they write it..

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You need to post up copies of what they sent?

Lowell Financial (Monument) No CCA - File Closed ** WON**:D

1st Credit (Citi Financial) No CCA - Credit Report Marked 'Satisfied' ** WON **:D

American Express No CCA - Pending

RBS Mint No CCA - Pending

CL Finance (Morgan Stanley) No CCA - In Court:eek:

HSBC - No CCA - In Court:eek:

Link Financial (MBNA) No CCA - Pending

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit tight and wait for the experts to pick up your thread. I am a newbie like you but from scouting about the site I can see you agreement is missing one big feature your signature - unless you have blanked it out. Below was copied from another thread and is supposedly a responce from the OFT to an email asking about section 77 - 78. ' Consumer Credit Act 1974 (‘the Act') Our Ref: Epic/Enq/E/1760 Thank you for your email received on 31 March about your enquiry into the Consumer Credit Act Sect 77 & 78.I apologise for the delayed response. The general effects of sections 77-79 requires the creditor/owner (in the case of a hire agreement) under an agreement for (fixed-sum credit, running account credit and hire agreement) to provide the debtor/hirer with a copy of the executed agreement and a statement of account on request. If a creditor/owner fails to comply with a valid request within a period of 12 days (not including the date of receipt of the request) he may not enforce the agreement at all. This prevents enforcement with or without a court order. If a default lasts for a month (for example a calendar month) it constitutes an offence. We understand your concerns in this matter but please do remember however that once the creditor/owner complies with the request albeit out of time, he may once again enforce the agreement. A ‘true copy’ of an agreement principally consists of the terms and conditions of the agreement and the statutory content of the agreement. The name, address and signature of the debtor do not have to be provided. Additionally, the creditor must supply the total sum paid under the agreement by the debtor; the total sum which has become payable under the agreement but remains unpaid; and the total sum which is to become payable under the agreement by the debtor (the latter two must include the various amounts comprised in that total sum and the date when each is/was due). However, the copy must be a copy. It need not be exact on immaterial points, but it cannot be a conjectured reconstruction. If the trader has no original copy, the trader will have difficulty showing that he has complied with the regulation by supplying a ‘true copy’, since nobody would know what was in the original. When the trader comes to enforce the debt in court, he needs to have a signed copy of the agreement in order to enforce. As the law stands currently he cannot otherwise. We note your concerns that in the absence of a copy of the original agreement someone's liability for a debt can only lead to further query. However in circumstances like this we would view it is as unfair practice under section 25(2) (d) of the Act and relevant to licence fitness if a trader failed to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate when a debt is queried or disputed. If you would like to make a formal complaint. Please fill in the attached complaint form. Thank you again for writing to us. '

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

 

just wanted to clarify was it taken out online in 2006 as thats the date with the tick box ticked on one of the scans

 

if so then im in battle with online applications and the tick box ive been told is my agreement made online and would be correct, so im still investigating mine, at the moment but lets wait for others to come along and give you a bit more info and maybe clear up my query too at the same time

 

will subscribe and if i get other info will alert you too

 

take care for now

 

laters

 

angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

to me this does not look like to be the orignal argeement it seems like something they just printed and sent to you. if you look at page 18 this page http://i374.photobucket.com/albums/oo190/minnimes/img018-1.jpg just above the signature box to cancel the agreement there seems to be a document refrence number MB0908_ABMG to me it looks like this document is from September 2008. This document might be a fraud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to me this does not look like to be the orignal argeement it seems like something they just printed and sent to you. if you look at page 18 this page http://i374.photobucket.com/albums/oo190/minnimes/img018-1.jpg just above the signature box to cancel the agreement there seems to be a document refrence number MB0908_ABMG to me it looks like this document is from September 2008. This document might be a fraud.

 

 

i also notice that the charges on this page are £12 yet earlier on it says charges are £25. it cant be both so i know they dont tally. just dont know what i can do about it.

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

dont think i had to give an actual sig cause it was an online application but to me it looks like they just made it and posted it. there are no details about me on it except my name and address. there is nothing to link each page so how do i know that the page with the tick which they claim i did is actually mine? hmmm, seems abit dodgy but what do i do about it?

:rolleyes::confused::rolleyes::confused:
Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not sure as to how online applications work someone else here might be able to fill us in on it my appliaction to mbna was online also and i have sent my cca request aslo to them this week. i am under the opinion that if you do it online its just an application but when they approve it they have to send out a cca for you to sign. i could be wrong if anyone else can fill us in it would be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you did apply on line they should have sent you an application form to sign and return. They still have to send you a true copy of the original agreement even if they do not have to provide the original agreement plus signature until enforcement at a court hearing. The date stamp inconsistency is enough on its own to show it is not a true copy and so the account remains in dispute. I would send out the letter suggested in the letter template list and wait for their next move. Obviously do not pay them any more money as that implies you accept the legitimacy of the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...