Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I think 1st credit have got me!!!


bluetack
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5576 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I am desperate for some advice please.

 

Back in 2005 my husband was made bankrupt.

We had a joint bank account with lloyds tsb which was closed by them in april 2005, amount owing on the overdraft facility approx £2,400.

 

We were badly flooded in July 2007 and lost a very large filing cabinet full of all our documents, so we have no records of anything before this date.

 

In Sept 2007 I received a DCA from 1st credit in my name only, saying they had bought the tsb debt in july 2006 and wanted me to pay up.

 

I wrote the standard letter asking for copies of all paperwork relating to the alleged debt. Nothing arrived and when it eventually went to court I was granted a stay.

They have managed to get the stay lifted and have sent me 1 year's statements of the bank account.

 

I have to go to court on 3rd dec and have no idea how I am going to fight or pay this. I am registered disabled and cannot work. Any advice would be appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone, I am desperate for some advice please.

 

Back in 2005 my husband was made bankrupt.

We had a joint bank account with lloyds tsb which was closed by them in april 2005, amount owing on the overdraft facility approx £2,400.

 

We were badly flooded in July 2007 and lost a very large filing cabinet full of all our documents, so we have no records of anything before this date.

 

In Sept 2007 I received a DCA from 1st credit in my name only, saying they had bought the tsb debt in july 2006 and wanted me to pay up.

 

I wrote the standard letter asking for copies of all paperwork relating to the alleged debt. Nothing arrived and when it eventually went to court I was granted a stay.

They have managed to get the stay lifted and have sent me 1 year's statements of the bank account.

 

I have to go to court on 3rd dec and have no idea how I am going to fight or pay this. I am registered disabled and cannot work. Any advice would be appreciated!

 

 

Make applicartion for disclosure of all statements since account opened within 14 days in order to determine how much is default charges and ask for the hearing to be vacated until they comply

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what reason was the stay originally granted?

 

We had a joint bank account with lloyds tsb which was closed by them in april 2005, amount owing on the overdraft facility approx £2,400.

 

Do you have any idea how much of this amount was made up of charges?

 

They have managed to get the stay lifted and have sent me 1 year's statements of the bank account.

 

Personally I would be looking for the last 6 years worth. They would appear to be trying to pull a fast one by giving you a little bit of information but not enough to be useful.

 

Did you initially enter a defence?

 

Could you please tell us the Particulars of Claim and any defence that you have entered?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very likely that a substantial amount of this is made up of excessive penalty charges.....I presume you have received a court claim form ? have you said you are going to defend ?....I do remember your excellent win against CL Finance too....with the statements in the opposing solicitors name !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh, hang on a minute,was the official receiver made aware of this joint account. Devils advocate here, I don't know the answer but I feel those who will may need some more information well over and above what you have provided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The stay was granted because they failed to provide any statements.

 

I can see a lot of charges on the 1 year bundle of statements.

 

I have not entered a defence.

 

Also I think we were paying PPI but the bank refused to pay out because my husband didn't sign on as unemployed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh, hang on a minute,was the official receiver made aware of this joint account. Devils advocate here, I don't know the answer but I feel those who will may need some more information well over and above what you have provided.

A joint account has joint and several liability.

 

Bluetac what is the hearing on the 3rd of December about? I am not clear on this as you say you have not entered a defence.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only received the paperwork this week Rory and haven't entered a defence because I don't know how to defend it.

It is clear we had the bank account and were overdrawn by the amount claimed so I am not sure if I really have a defence. The only way I can see is to get the debt reduced by the amount of the obscene charges levied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does the paperwork state?

 

You may or may not know that the test case on bank charges is far from over and currently claims are all being stayed for bank charges. What this also means is that a judge couldn't rule on your case if you raise the issue of bank charges and would have no alternative but to currently stay the claim against you.

 

The only way I can see is to get the debt reduced by the amount of the obscene charges levied.

Once you add contractual interest they may end up owing you money.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rory, 1st credit mamaged to get the stay lifted because they claim to have sent me statements of the account in September. The only statements I have received from them arrived yesterday.

They claim there is no credit agreement because it was an overdraft facility. In the 1 year statements I have calculated £784.00 bank charges. As we had the bank account for 15 years the charges would amount to quite a large amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know if this info will help at all but i went bankrupt at the begining if 07, and had a joint account with my OH which was as near as dam it £300 OD. It was an agreed overdraft, so the only charges we paid up to my BR date where intrest.

 

We knew my OH would be liable for this after my BR, but TSB where very agresive with her about it, you have to remember it was me who went bankrupt, not her.

 

As soon as they found out i was bankrupt they cancelled the agreed overdraft, started adding £30 in unautherised OD charges and at least doubled the intrest, together with other charges i never got an explanation for, all without informing my OH, or responding to any letters asking what would happen over this liabilaty my OH had been left with.

 

Now i played mery hell with the TSB over this, yes i had gone bankrupt but my OH had not, so was being penalised for me going bankrupt, a point they could not defend, they wiped all charges of the account and arranged a payment plan to clear it.

 

The point is if your OH went bankrupt in 05, and they did the same, thats a lot of charges you may have, so you really need to go back as far as then at least so one years statemants is not enough to prove the amount of there claim is correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Bluey these might help you....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/145092-bank-account-cca.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/31515-ccas-overdrafts.html

 

In the last thread you will see this...

 

Overdrafts come under section 10 of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

10.—(1) For the purposes of this Act—

(a) running-account credit is a facility under a personal credit agreement whereby the debtor is enabled to receive from time to time (whether in his own person, or by another person) from the creditor or a third party cash, goods and services (or any of them) to an amount or value such that, taking into account payments made by or to the credit of the debtor, the credit limit (if any) is not at any time exceeded; and

(b) fixed-sum credit is any other facility under a personal credit agreement whereby the debtor is enabled to receive credit (whether in one amount or by

instalments).

(2) In relation to running-account credit, " credit limit" means, as respects any period, the maximum debit balance which, under the credit agreement, is allowed to stand on the account during that period, disregarding any term of the agreement allowing that maximum to be exceeded merely temporarily.

(3) For the purposes of section 8(2), running-account credit shall be taken not to exceed the amount specified in that subsection (" the specified amount") if—

(a) the credit limit does not exceed the specified amount; or

(b) whether or not there is a credit limit, and if there is, notwithstanding that it

exceeds the specified amount,—

(i) the debtor is not enabled to draw at any one time an amount which, so far as

(having regard to section 9(4)) it represents credit, exceeds the specified

amount, or

(ii) the agreement provides that, if the debit balance rises above a given

amount (not exceeding the specified amount), the rate of the total charge for credit increases or any other condition favouring the creditor or his associate comes into operation, or

(iii) at the time the agreement is made it is probable, having regard to the

terms of the agreement and any other relevant considerations, that the debit balance will not at any time rise above the specified amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

Just thought I'd let you know I won my court case today (by the skin of my teeth)!!

 

I will explain in more detail about this case, I know I have been a bit vague but I had no paperwork because we were flooded.

 

We had a joint bank account with Lloyds tsb with a £3,000 overdraft.

My hubby was made bankrupt in feb 2005.

This debt was included in the bankrubtcy but as it was a joint account the whole debt was transferred to me.

The £3,000 debt was bought by 1st credit in 2006.

They tried to enter a judgement against me in 2007, I had this set aside because they failed to supply statements of the account.

In September 2008 they had the stay lifted and judgement was granted against me because they produced 1 years statements proving I owed the money.

I applied again to have the judgement set aside but could not give a defence as no-one had sent me the relevant statements.

Ten days ago I received the statements, too late to submit a defence.

 

I appeared in court today together with the solicitor from 'the other side'.

The judge asked for my defence and I explained:

1)Insufficient statements to prove how the debt was accrued/answer-not relevant.

2)CCA states that statements must be produced not less than one year apart for running accounts/answer-CCA not relevant in this case because the debt has been proved and deed of assignment valid.

 

My last shot (believe me I was sh****** a brick by now) was that when the account was closed by lloyds in April 2005 the balance reverted to zero. How could 1st credit purchase a debt one year later in 2006 with a zero balance??

The judge looked at the last statement, smiled at me and said 'you have found your defence, well done'.

I now have 28 days to submit my defence in writing, the judgement will then be set aside.

Meanwhile (much to the defendant's solicitors's obvious shock) 1st credit have to provide all statements of the account-15 years worth or proof of how the debt accumilated including all charges, within twelve days.

Impossible I think.

Thank you everyone for your help and support, I will donate when I recover financially from this mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good on you Bluetack!!

 

I'll bet, judging by the £700+ of charges on the last year of statements that they end up owing you money, once that pesky stay has been removed on the bank charges test case.

 

Go get em!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done :)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...