Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equita bailiffs advice needed pleeease!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Im new to this site and deperatley need some advice so i can sleep!

Im gonna try keep it as short and simple as possible and any help would be much apreciated.

 

Ok.. my problems started June this year when i received a letter from Equita, it was a Final demand for an outstanding penalty charge demanding payment immediately or to leave my car keys and log book for them to collect. I called them up and found out it was from an unpaid parking ticket, one that i had appealed with the council and had not yet had any response. I set out to make a statutory dec and called the council for more details as Equita didnt have all the info needed. They gave me the info and told me there were also 3 other unpaid parking tickets against me and they were also wih the bailiffs, i knew nothing of these, had received no ticket on car (2 were camera issued) nor NTO's.

I filed stat decs for all 4 and faxed them to the TEC. This puts the bailiffs on hold. It was a friday and i confirmed with Equita and Hounlsow borough that all was on hold whilst the court process the stat decs.

Monday morn 5am i awoken by a bailiff clamping my vehicle, i told him i had made the decs and he had no right to clamp my car, he demanded thousands, refused to give me his name other than 'junior' and left saying a tow truck would be there shortly if i didnt make payment. He came back at 8am took off the clamp and left.

 

Ostober i received notice from the court that one fine had been revoked the other 3 refused, i appealed against this decision costing me £65 ( not a lot but i am a single mother of 3) spoke to Hounslow borough again who promised to keep it on hold whilst the court process the appeal.

 

I then receive another letter on 17/11/08 from Equita dated 13/11/08 that if i dont call them within 24hrs to make payment or reach an agreement they would start enforcment proceedings. I called them, they told me they cant discuss it with me because i didnt call within 24hrs, that further charges had been added and it was now with a bailiff. I called Hounslow who informed me a member of staff acidently took the case off hold and they contacted Equita to put the case back on hold.

Another letter arrived from Equita 18/11/08 again dated 13/11/08....Another Final Demandstating Warrant of Execution dated (no date, they claim a removal team had attended my property to remove goods and they would be back and further charges had been added!!!!

 

 

Now the bailiffs are on hold again but my queries are:

 

1. Is the above procedure of the bailifffs legal? the 24hr thing is ridiculous, and the 2 letters within 1 day of each other?

 

2. If i put the log book in a friends name (not at my address) but they find the car outside my address can they still take it and auction it?

 

3. I am in receipt of benefits and have 3 young children, I cannot afford to pay large amounts at once, Are they allowed to demand this or do they have to accpet a payment plan?

 

4. Do the bailiffs have set fees for these kind of things or can they just add what they like?

 

5. If i pay Hounslow borough what is owed to them (£155 for each ticket), will this stop the bailiff action?

 

 

I hope someone has had the patience to read this and is willing to offer some advice, I gave all the info because after reading other threads i realised the most info the easiest it is to help!

I am not trying to avoid my fines, i just want the chance to pay the normal amount of a ticket not the bailiffs ridiculous fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A parking tickets expert might be better for advising on appeals and a councils failure to send NTO’s. Filing an out of time appeal immediately stops enforcement. Have you moved recently?

 

1. Letter fees are £11.20 per ticket. The regulations only allow one letter per ticket.

 

2. No just change the name of the registered keeper with DVLA quickly.

 

3. You might be classed a vulnerable person for the purposes of civil enforcement and you can have all enforcement action stopped. A vulnerable person means http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm#part10 A letter is below so you must post it to every bailiff company involved and keep copies by your door.

 

4. Yes the regulations prescribing maximum bailiffs fees for collecting unpaid parking tickets is Schedule 1 of the Enforcement of Road Traffic Debts (Certificated Bailiffs)(Amended 2003) Regulations 1993. It prescribes a maximum of £11.20 a letter per ticket and 28% on the first £200 collected, 5.5% above £200. No walking possessions agreement signed £0.00. No goods have been transported in a van so Attending to Remove £0.00. Nothing else. In this scenario a £155 ticket carries maxumim bailiff fees of £54.60. None of this £150+ Attending to Remove and van fees malarky.

 

5. Yes but expect a fight with bailiffs wanting their fees. They will go hungry.

 

Follow this advice verbatim: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs-sheriff-officers/169360-help-bailiffs-coming-print.html and keep this letter handy in case more bailiffs turn up and send a copy to every council that has sent a ticket for enforcement.

 

The Omnipotent Bailiff Co, Plc

Their Address 1

Their Address 2

Their Address 3

Postcode

 

DATE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Your visit to [1st LINE OF ADDRESS]

 

I write further to your visit by your bailiff and confirm I am classed a vulnerable person for the purposes of civil enforcement in the meaning of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents directives. I am a claimant of a prescribed benefit because I am living below the government's poverty threshold.

 

Where a debtor falling into a vulnerable persons category is discovered by an enforcement agent, the matter shall be referred back to the court and no seizure of goods may proceed.

 

This document is delivered by Royal Mail and I deem it good service upon you by the ordinary course of post under Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978. It is your responsibility and in your best interests this letter is handed to the relevant person within your organisation.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

YOUR NAME

 

Send this letter to every bailiff that has contacted you so far.

 

The Omnipotent Bailiff Co, Plc

Their Address 1

Their Address 2

Their Address 3

Postcode

 

DATE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: [YOUR NAME + REF]: Fee irregularities. Opportunity to compensate

 

I write following visits by your bailiff however there appears to be irregularities with your fees. I ask you to provide the following within fourteen (14) days:

 

1) The name of the certificating court and certificate number for the bailiff in charge

 

2) Written confirmation of a) your fees, and b) the original debt

 

3) Truthfully confirm in writing your fees are lawful and comply with regulations prescribing bailiffs fees

 

4) The name and address of the person or body you act for

 

If you cannot complete the above, please unconditionally pay me within fourteen (14) days a refund of all unlawful fees and unconditionally pay me compensation of £4999.00 for failure to comply with the law prescribing your fees and I will consider this aspect of the matter closed.

 

If I later find an irregularity with your fees within the statutory time limit of 6 years as prescribed under Section 2 of the Limitation Act 1980, I will enter no further correspondence with you and automatically file a Form 4 at court for dishonestly defrauding me with your fees. This may also involve a criminal investigation by police and your bailiff and firm's director(s) may receive a criminal record for assisting an offender, benefiting from proceeds of crime and committing offences under the Fraud Act 2006.

 

This document is delivered by Royal Mail and I deem it good service upon you by the ordinary course of post under Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978. It is your responsibility and in your best interests this letter is handed to the relevant person within your organisation.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

YOUR NAME

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Burp I thank you so much for your advice, it seems that as a single mother on income support i am deemed a vulnerable persson and will forward the above letter tomorrow and also to be on the safe side register the car in my friends name.

 

Can you just clarify for me... should i send the letter tomorrow or wait for the outcome of the court appeal?

 

Hope fully i will have a better nights sleep now knowing there is some hope for me and my car!

 

Michelle

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michelle

 

The ONLY letter that you need to write is to ask for a full and detailed breakdown of the fees and charges applied to your account.

 

The problems with the car being clamped after filing an Out of Time are sadly due to the dreadful delays at TEC not informing the local authorities.

 

Why have you only had to pay £65 to appeal. The amount is supposed to be £75 for EACH PCN. Can you let me know.

 

As things stand now....the matter is on hold waiting for your hearing. This can take around 2 months or even more. Have you received a Notice of Seizure of Goods and Inventory. If not, then your car has NOT been seized and you can therefore use this period of time to transfer ownership. This is very important.

 

For the N244 hearing. It is VITAL that you attend the hearing as most of these applications are successful. If so, you can request costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the letter to the bailiffs now. No need to write to the council that issued the tickets. Tomtubby I understand is an expert on parking tickets appeals, but your post says you are in receipt of benefits. You can ask for Fee remission of the £75 fee. Download form EX160 http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/ex160.pdf and its notes http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/ex160a_e.pdf and return it with N244 with proof of benefits which must be: a) less than one month old b) have your name and address and postcode c) confirm benefit entitlement. Any DWP letter should suffice and TEC should vaive the £75 N244 fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not received a seizure notice so will transfer the log book immediately.

 

The fee could have been £75 i cant remember but i did only pay the one fee for the 3 tickets, I have also requested this to be returned in the proper way.

 

So i need to check all 3 are being processed with the TEC.

Ask for a break down of costs from Equita.

Insure i attend the hearing.

 

Anything else?

Shall i send the above letter about me being a vulnerable person to anyone?

 

REgards

Michelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you will need three lots of EX160's one for each appeal. You must be 150% sure you have grounds to have each ticket overturned. Get expert advice on partking ticket validity, there is a checklist of anomalies that can unravel a parking ticket - too many to list here. Print the following and keep it inside your door and memorise it. If you keep the bailiffs out long enough, the will move on and leave you alone.

 

DEALING WITH BAILIFFS ON YOUR DOORSTEP

 

 

1. ALWAYS! Keep your door LOCKED SHUT at all times. NEVER open the door to a bailiff - speak through a window or letterbox

2. ALWAYS! Hide your car - in the garage or park it well away

3. ALWAYS! Take a photo of the bailiff and his vehicle (better still use a video camcorder) and record everything

4. ALWAYS! Speak as little as possible to the bailiff

5. ALWAYS! Ask for his bailiff's certificate number

6. ALWAYS! Ask which court issued his certificate

7. ALWAYS! Ask for a full breakdown of his fees IN WRITING

8. ALWAYS! Ask who the creditor is (if you don't know)

9. ALWAYS! Pay using a credit card, avoid cash and debit cards if possible

10. ALWAYS! If you have grounds, get an appeal lodged immediately (parking tickets) - it stops enforcement

 

1. NEVER! Sign any documents handed to you by a bailiff

2. NEVER! Phone a bailiff (unless asking him which Court issued his certificate)

3. NEVER! Admit any debt

4. NEVER! Say or "confirm" your name address or date of birth

 

If you feel intimidated or threatened by a bailiff, call police on 999. Remember that door remains LOCKED SHUT until the bailiff is a safe distance from your property. You DO NOT have to open the door to police. If possible get EVERYTHING on video, it can be used in court: Example: YouTube - Rossendales Bailiffs

 

As for your letters: Keep this one inside your front door incase a bailiff turns up.

 

[DATE]

 

BY HAND

 

Dear Bailiffs.

 

Re: Parking tickets

 

[NAME OF] Council appears to have instructed you to collect unpaid parking tickets.

 

This notice directs that you are not being given entry to my home or to levy goods contained within and your entitlement to charge a Walking Possessions fee stands revoked. Please be advised that if your fees are found to contradict Schedule 1 of the Enforcement of Road Traffic Debts (Certificated Bailiffs)(Amended 2003) Regulations 1993 and you may be liable for criminal prosecution under the Fraud Act 2006. Without corresponding with you further I will also automatically file a Form 4 at court.

 

I confirm I am classed a vulnerable person for the purposes of civil enforcement in the meaning of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents directives. I am a claimant of a prescribed benefit because I am living below the government's poverty threshold. Where a debtor falling into a vulnerable persons category is discovered by an enforcement agent, the matter shall be referred back to the court and no seizure of goods may proceed.

 

Please be advised it is not a "criminal offence" for me to deny a bailiff entry to my property and it is an offence to threaten me with breaking and entering with "locksmiths".

 

Please provide me with a breakdown of your fees, put it through the letterbox and quietly leave the property.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

 

YOUR NAME

 

Now write the following letter sent it BY POST. ASAP

 

The Omnipotent Bailiff Co, Plc

Their Address 1

Their Address 2

Their Address 3

Postcode

 

DATE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: [YOUR NAME + REF]: Fee irregularities. Opportunity to compensate

 

I write following visits by your bailiff however there appears to be irregularities with your fees. I ask you to provide the following within fourteen (14) days:

 

1) The name of the certificating court and certificate number for the bailiff in charge

 

2) Written confirmation of a) your fees, and b) the original debt

 

3) Truthfully confirm in writing your fees are lawful and comply with regulations prescribing bailiffs fees

 

4) The name and address of the person or body you act for

 

If you cannot complete the above, please unconditionally pay me within fourteen (14) days a refund of all unlawful fees and unconditionally pay me compensation of £4999.00 for failure to comply with the law prescribing your fees and I will consider this aspect of the matter closed.

 

If I later find an irregularity with your fees within the statutory time limit of 6 years as prescribed under Section 2 of the Limitation Act 1980, I will enter no further correspondence with you and automatically file a Form 4 at court for dishonestly defrauding me with your fees. This may also involve a criminal investigation by police and your bailiff and firm's director(s) may receive a criminal record for assisting an offender, benefiting from proceeds of crime and committing offences under the Fraud Act 2006.

 

I confirm in writing I am classed a vulnerable person for the purposes of civil enforcement in the meaning of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents directives. I am a claimant of a prescribed benefit because I am living below the government's poverty threshold. Where a debtor falling into a vulnerable persons category is discovered by an enforcement agent, the matter shall be referred back to the court and no seizure of goods may proceed.

 

This document is delivered by Royal Mail and I deem it good service upon you by the ordinary course of post under Section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978. It is your responsibility and in your best interests this letter is handed to the relevant person within your organisation.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

YOUR NAME

 

 

Dig out your cars V5 and change the name of the registered keeper. Make your car safe or park it well away until this matter is resolved. You don't need to write to the council that issued the parking tickets - yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

Just a quick update for you... I went to court for the appeal hearing and the magistrate upheld my stat decs for all cases. So now i believe that the council has to re-issue the NTO's and call off bailiff action.

 

I am waiting for the NTO's, do they have a deadline to issue them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

WELL DONE!!

 

BUT..this is really worrying because in every case that we have seen these applications are being ACCEPTED by the District Judge which means that he has not only overruled the local authorities refusal of the Out of Time late Statutory Declaration..but more seriously, he has overruled also the decision of the Court Officer at TEC who's role is to make an "impartial judicial decision" of the council's rejection.

 

What is also disturbing is that TEC have imposed a fee of £75 to seek to review !!

 

Did you ask the court for your costs (ie: £75) If not, then you cannot now claim this back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its all very well the op here now transferring the car in to someone elses name, however if the bailiffs are worth their salt then surely they would have done a dvla check on the registered owner of the car and if so then it would have come back in ops name, a quick check would show that transfer of ownership had happened after bailiff involvement, would that not be evading distrain and if they have the docs from DVLA could they not still seize the vehicle as they have proof it was in her name at the time, thus then making the matter a civil one???????

 

just wanting to make sure said op does not fall foul of any sort of recrimination here, we must be careful to cover all aspects.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't matter, as has been said before, until goods are seized the owner has the right to do with them whatever they want.

 

Anyone who doesn't take advantage of that, risks losing their stuff

 

I didnt know that.

 

I think a sticky with 'Bailiffs tactics' is in order, this being the first post.

 

The reason I say this is - there's a basic framework a bailiff has to adhere to. A lot of the posts on there are an imaginative interpretation of that framework by Bailiffs. Ergo, there are only a few points a bailiff can get you on. The rest of their shmooze is mostly smoke and mirrors

Just mho

 

Fwog

Link to post
Share on other sites

Framework or not, the problem is what happens in practice.

 

Regardless of what the law says, the bailiffs will often do whatever they think they can get away with - that applies to some councils too.

 

Well the 4% charge is evidence of that;)

 

I just htought that your post was a great bit of info.

 

A 'did you know' or 'bailiff tactics' thread would be apt. A lot of the posts are repetitive questions, just post it all in a sticky to outline the basics if ,say ,your due a visit tomorrow, as many new posters are. I know most of the info is on the site if you search.

 

Just trying to be helpful:D

 

Fwog

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry fwog I didn't mean my post in that way,

 

Actually you're right, the problem is stress.

 

Most of the time people are too stressed to look around them.

 

They need contact more than anything else, few are able to do the research under stress, in fact I was unable to to begin with until some very kind people pointed me in the right direction.

 

Reading the threatening letters from the council, bailiffs, dca's, is a very lonely experience, and listening to a bailiff ranting on the other side of your front door is even worse, that's the power of this kind of forum, it takes away that awful loneliness at a time of enormous stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...