Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wave/Ex GMAC Mortgage eviction help


biddy65
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5696 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Olive,

 

No offence taken at all ;)

 

I am fully aware that some (not all) lenders do continue to charge these account management fees (and also that it is not normally mentioned in court- but when it is, judges tend to agree that they should not be). That was precisely why I suggested that they should not be payable & that if they continue to charge them that part can be challenged (as they are no longer justified fees reflecting their costs, but effectively become penalty fees, which are not permitted).

 

The other costs, however, one is indeed stuck with, as they are contractual (unless, of course, a hearing needs to be adjourned entirely due to the gross incompetence of the Claimant, in which case the judge may disallow the costs for that hearing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Olive,

 

No offence taken at all ;)

 

I am fully aware that some (not all) lenders do continue to charge these account management fees (and also that it is not normally mentioned in court- but when it is, judges tend to agree that they should not be). That was precisely why I suggested that they should not be payable & that if they continue to charge them that part can be challenged (as they are no longer justified fees reflecting their costs, but effectively become penalty fees, which are not permitted).

 

The other costs, however, one is indeed stuck with, as they are contractual (unless, of course, a hearing needs to be adjourned entirely due to the gross incompetence of the Claimant, in which case the judge may disallow the costs for that hearing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it is mainly just sub prime lenders that charge this fee and yes you are right it is as far as I am concerned a penalty. My judge said that i had to remortgage to escape them as he could not do anything, but that it anouther story.

 

Biddy what I suggest is that you look on your monthly statements that you have been getting, as you have been behind for a while. They should be shown on there if they are charging you

 

olives xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it is mainly just sub prime lenders that charge this fee and yes you are right it is as far as I am concerned a penalty. My judge said that i had to remortgage to escape them as he could not do anything, but that it anouther story.

 

Biddy what I suggest is that you look on your monthly statements that you have been getting, as you have been behind for a while. They should be shown on there if they are charging you

 

olives xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,just had the letter today from the court it states on there that payment should be made by the 28 th which we explained we couldn't do we have made the weekly payments from when we went to court and they haven't returned them but this doesn't cover the full amount they supposed to get,did explain to the judge that we were going to pay weekly but he hasn't taken this in to consideration have contact the lender but had no response only got three days to find the rest. where do we stand if we have made payments but not the full amount?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,just had the letter today from the court it states on there that payment should be made by the 28 th which we explained we couldn't do we have made the weekly payments from when we went to court and they haven't returned them but this doesn't cover the full amount they supposed to get,did explain to the judge that we were going to pay weekly but he hasn't taken this in to consideration have contact the lender but had no response only got three days to find the rest. where do we stand if we have made payments but not the full amount?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it say anything about weekly payments? Also if your original agreement was for the 1st of the month why was it changed to the 28th.

Judge's don't nomally alter the contract date.I wouldn't worry too much as long as your payment is only a few days late,with the new government guidelines you will be ok as you are paying the agreed amount abiet a few days late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it say anything about weekly payments? Also if your original agreement was for the 1st of the month why was it changed to the 28th.

Judge's don't nomally alter the contract date.I wouldn't worry too much as long as your payment is only a few days late,with the new government guidelines you will be ok as you are paying the agreed amount abiet a few days late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Biddy, it will depend on whether the order says first payment by 28th October or payment by 28th of the month - which does the order say?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Biddy, it will depend on whether the order says first payment by 28th October or payment by 28th of the month - which does the order say?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the order is concerned, if you don't make a payment of the full mortgage instalment plus £200 by 28 October, you will be in breach of the order, and the mortgage company can apply for a warrant for eviction.

 

In practice that is probably unlikely, but not impossible. If they do obtain an eviction date, you can apply to the court to have that suspended- and if you can show that you have been making weekly payments, you may have a reasonable prospect of success. HOWEVER, each time the matter goes back to court will weaken your prospects of success, and, because you are in breach of the order, the mortgage company will be entitled to add their legal costs for that hearing to your account- so it will cost you as well.

 

If you have been making weekly payments, that should already go towards reducing what you still have to pay by Tuesday- is there any way in which you can get hold of funds to meet the shortfall?

 

The court can't change the contractual due date, but the court can set a date for a first payment. There might be an argument (although a fairly weak one), that you should be fine provided that you pay the additional amount ordered by the court by the 28th, and the full amount of the mortgage instalment by the 1st (i.e. the £200 would be the 1st payment, made by 28 October, and the mortgage instalment as if falls due, i.e. by the 1st). Several mortgage companies ask for payments to be made by the 28th, so that the funds clear & reach their accounts by the 1st. Although, to be honest, I would be very surprised if they issued a warrant if the funds are paid in by the 1st. That said, I suspect if you can't make payment by Tuesday, the additional 4 days that payment by the 1st would give you probably won't make much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the order is concerned, if you don't make a payment of the full mortgage instalment plus £200 by 28 October, you will be in breach of the order, and the mortgage company can apply for a warrant for eviction.

 

In practice that is probably unlikely, but not impossible. If they do obtain an eviction date, you can apply to the court to have that suspended- and if you can show that you have been making weekly payments, you may have a reasonable prospect of success. HOWEVER, each time the matter goes back to court will weaken your prospects of success, and, because you are in breach of the order, the mortgage company will be entitled to add their legal costs for that hearing to your account- so it will cost you as well.

 

If you have been making weekly payments, that should already go towards reducing what you still have to pay by Tuesday- is there any way in which you can get hold of funds to meet the shortfall?

 

The court can't change the contractual due date, but the court can set a date for a first payment. There might be an argument (although a fairly weak one), that you should be fine provided that you pay the additional amount ordered by the court by the 28th, and the full amount of the mortgage instalment by the 1st (i.e. the £200 would be the 1st payment, made by 28 October, and the mortgage instalment as if falls due, i.e. by the 1st). Several mortgage companies ask for payments to be made by the 28th, so that the funds clear & reach their accounts by the 1st. Although, to be honest, I would be very surprised if they issued a warrant if the funds are paid in by the 1st. That said, I suspect if you can't make payment by Tuesday, the additional 4 days that payment by the 1st would give you probably won't make much difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, how are you making the payments - is it by phone?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, how are you making the payments - is it by phone?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right- First of all, let me say that it is extremely unlikely that the mortgage lender would apply for a warrant for possession between now and Friday- particularly if you have kept them informed.

 

Secondly, even if they did apply for a warrant today or tomorrow, they would not get an eviction date before Friday, and if you were fully paid up then, they would either vacate any such date, or you would have a very solid case for applying to have any such warrant suspended.

 

Thirdly (as I mentioned before) check the contractual due date! There is an argument, that the first date stipulated by the court only refers to the additional amount (and you had paid more than the £200 by yesterday), whereas the instalment falls due by the contractual date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right- First of all, let me say that it is extremely unlikely that the mortgage lender would apply for a warrant for possession between now and Friday- particularly if you have kept them informed.

 

Secondly, even if they did apply for a warrant today or tomorrow, they would not get an eviction date before Friday, and if you were fully paid up then, they would either vacate any such date, or you would have a very solid case for applying to have any such warrant suspended.

 

Thirdly (as I mentioned before) check the contractual due date! There is an argument, that the first date stipulated by the court only refers to the additional amount (and you had paid more than the £200 by yesterday), whereas the instalment falls due by the contractual date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Wave/Ex GMAC Mortgage eviction help
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...