Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have several years of claims handling experience and if anybody needs any advice regarding their claims then feel free to give me a shout. Please note i am not touting for injury claims etc, im just trying to help people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

fell in loo at work, the cleaner hadnet put the sign up. thought i broke me wrist it hurt so bad.

 

the down side is after waiting to be seen in A&E for 5 hours i gave up n went home.

 

Its given me jip eversince

 

was about 3/4 years ago....

 

any mileage?

 

thanks

 

Tyger

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son tonight (he's 15) brushed past the tail pipe of a blue corsa in Harry Tuffins at Churchstoke. He's got a burn about 3 incjes in diameter.

 

i should have taken the reg number but was too busy trying to get the lad home to have some treatment. what should I have done?

 

Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

fell in loo at work, the cleaner hadnet put the sign up. thought i broke me wrist it hurt so bad.

 

the down side is after waiting to be seen in A&E for 5 hours i gave up n went home.

 

Its given me jip eversince

 

was about 3/4 years ago....

 

any mileage?

 

thanks

 

Tyger

 

you only have 3 years from date of accident to submit a claim, sorry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son tonight (he's 15) brushed past the tail pipe of a blue corsa in Harry Tuffins at Churchstoke. He's got a burn about 3 incjes in diameter.

 

i should have taken the reg number but was too busy trying to get the lad home to have some treatment. what should I have done?

 

Mike

 

Your son brushed past the tail pipe, to make a claim you have to show the driver acted in a negligent manner, unfortunately from what you have said, this would be very difficult to prove, especially if the driver did not stop and give any details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi mikeycan you please have a look at my link and offer me some advice...Cheers

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/insurance-assurance-companies/21248-had-accident-i-really.html

Live Long and Prosper!! Dont let the BxxxxxxS get you down....

 

Claiming back

Barclays £1968.00

Egg £100

MBNA £343.80 Recovered so far £140

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son tonight (he's 15) brushed past the tail pipe of a blue corsa in Harry Tuffins at Churchstoke. He's got a burn about 3 incjes in diameter.

 

i should have taken the reg number but was too busy trying to get the lad home to have some treatment. what should I have done?

 

Mike

 

You should have made him look where he was going tbh. There was no negligence attached to the driver as your son walked into his stationary vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

If you could offer any advice I would be appreciative.

I am registered disabled, and am in possession of a Motability Vehicle, blue badge, the works.

Hubby and I rally [bike] a lot and we take the mobility car with an electric disability scooter with us. We always gain permission to take the vehicle onto the site and on this occasion, we had permission from the steward of the club.

As hubby was pulling onto the camp site, it was dark, [no lighting] the grass around the right hand side of the entrance was just below knee high and on the left was a large control tent and permanent markers set into the ground. At this point, the markers looked like pieces of wood sticking out of the ground about 5 to 6 inches high. As hubby pulled into the entrance of the Rally/camp site one of these markers which was hidden by the grass came into contact with the driver side sill and door of my car.

Made a nice mess, when hubby jumped out of the car to have a look, he realised that these markers were rusty steel tubes filled with concrete.

I have about 100 witnesses to the accident, all who have said they would stand up in court and also people who had caught the same marker entering and exiting the rally site on trikes.

Now I supplied my insurance details to the steward of the club who at the time said no problem, put it through my insurance, quite amenable at the time. The steward came looked at the car at the marker and sent someone out with a tin of white paint, to paint the one offending marker and then covered it up with a very large cone.

Two months down the line, despite numerous letters [recorded delivery] and going to speak to the steward personally, I am being hounded by Motability because my car was due for change the day after the accident, ordered, ready for delivery and deposit paid. The steward has never supplied his insurance details.

So I went the other night to a meeting held at the club house and took with me a quote for £914 for the damages. The quote is low.

I left the quote behind the bar, and when we took a break in t he meeting the steward came chasing me down, saying I'm not paying for the damage.

I explain that motability insurance said that the vehicle was on private land and therefore I should try to resolve the matter with him before pursuing any action in the courts. He is now being totally uncooperative and is claiming there is a sign on the wall of one of the buildings excluding him from liability, [that we couldn't find and he couldn't point out, only one about parking at your own risk.] And through out this matter he is refusing to give me his insurance details, so at least I could talk to them and try to resolve the matter.. what should I do?

I've suffered a mini stroke since my run in with the steward Saturday night and the stress is playing awfully with my health, but I cannot afford to let this go because a fault claim against me and my NCD. [Motabilities 'strange' NCD bonus programme which reduces my deposit on a new vehicle] Could you help me in anyway? Alternatively, advise me a course of action to follow.

Many thanks for any help.

BB69

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

If you could offer any advice I would be appreciative.

I am registered disabled, and am in possession of a Motability Vehicle, blue badge, the works.

Hubby and I rally [bike] a lot and we take the mobility car with an electric disability scooter with us. We always gain permission to take the vehicle onto the site and on this occasion, we had permission from the steward of the club.

As hubby was pulling onto the camp site, it was dark, [no lighting] the grass around the right hand side of the entrance was just below knee high and on the left was a large control tent and permanent markers set into the ground. At this point, the markers looked like pieces of wood sticking out of the ground about 5 to 6 inches high. As hubby pulled into the entrance of the Rally/camp site one of these markers which was hidden by the grass came into contact with the driver side sill and door of my car.

Made a nice mess, when hubby jumped out of the car to have a look, he realised that these markers were rusty steel tubes filled with concrete.

I have about 100 witnesses to the accident, all who have said they would stand up in court and also people who had caught the same marker entering and exiting the rally site on trikes.

Now I supplied my insurance details to the steward of the club who at the time said no problem, put it through my insurance, quite amenable at the time. The steward came looked at the car at the marker and sent someone out with a tin of white paint, to paint the one offending marker and then covered it up with a very large cone.

Two months down the line, despite numerous letters [recorded delivery] and going to speak to the steward personally, I am being hounded by Motability because my car was due for change the day after the accident, ordered, ready for delivery and deposit paid. The steward has never supplied his insurance details.

So I went the other night to a meeting held at the club house and took with me a quote for £914 for the damages. The quote is low.

I left the quote behind the bar, and when we took a break in t he meeting the steward came chasing me down, saying I'm not paying for the damage.

I explain that motability insurance said that the vehicle was on private land and therefore I should try to resolve the matter with him before pursuing any action in the courts. He is now being totally uncooperative and is claiming there is a sign on the wall of one of the buildings excluding him from liability, [that we couldn't find and he couldn't point out, only one about parking at your own risk.] And through out this matter he is refusing to give me his insurance details, so at least I could talk to them and try to resolve the matter.. what should I do?

I've suffered a mini stroke since my run in with the steward Saturday night and the stress is playing awfully with my health, but I cannot afford to let this go because a fault claim against me and my NCD. [Motabilities 'strange' NCD bonus programme which reduces my deposit on a new vehicle] Could you help me in anyway? Alternatively, advise me a course of action to follow.

Many thanks for any help.

BB69

#

 

 

 

 

Ok, firstly i know it can be a pain in the backside when something like this happens but the duty is on you to prove the owners of the land have acted in a negligent manner, were aware of the danger and have taken no action to remedy the situation prior to your accident. Did you take photo's of the scene, if not and the location is still the same then take photo's and try to scan them on here so I can have a look. If you were to take this to small claims court you would still need to prove negligence against the third party. Also, was the object visible in daylight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike,

Thank you for responding to my plight.

I believe I acted correctly in requesting disabled access, which the steward granted.

The steward said the posts are to stop vehicles entering the site, which is a little crazy considering he rents the site out to clubs for rallies and custom shows and why on earth give me permission to take my vehicle on there if he knows that the posts are there to stop vehicles?

And the answer is no, until people were made aware by the lovely sound of my car scraping across the metal that there were even posts on that side. A friend from the club we am in also told me that he drove his trike over the top of this post, luckily no damage to his vehicle.

We concluded that this site must be rented out with out the correct insurance, I cannot understand why he wouldn't give me his insurers details and mumble something about motability and royal sun under his breath...! He basically told me to try taking the car back as it is. I can't, I've already had the report completed and recieve the £250 NCD and good condition report off the deposit..

I have taken photographs of the site, before and after it being painted.

When I went Saturday night, it looks like someone else had hit the post too... as it was sat sideways in the long grass with a mound of earth in the pathway.

Sorry Mike, how do I add photographs?

Many thanks.

BB69

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there Mikey- what a generous chap you are to offer your advice.

Many thanks for this.

 

Could you please have a look at my issue?

 

Insurance/Assurance companies > car insurance claim - how to speed it up?

 

Laura

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have made him look where he was going tbh. There was no negligence attached to the driver as your son walked into his stationary vehicle.

 

Unless of course it had a boy racer exhaust on it that stuck out an unreasonable distance from the rear of the car which no one has commented on, also a touch harsh I feel esp as the poor lad has a nasty burn on his leg.

 

I suggest has the car had a standard exhaust on it he would have not been able to get his leg anywhere near it, well you cant a most modern cards anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless of course it had a boy racer exhaust on it that stuck out an unreasonable distance from the rear of the car which no one has commented on, also a touch harsh I feel esp as the poor lad has a nasty burn on his leg.

 

I suggest has the car had a standard exhaust on it he would have not been able to get his leg anywhere near it, well you cant a most modern cards anyway

 

But then the car owner could push the blame onto the maker of the exhaust for selling an item which is not fit for use on public highways. I am not being pedantic here, merely trying to explain that proving negligence in this instance is nigh on impossible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were to take this to small claims court you would still need to prove negligence against the third party.

 

Erm, not quite true.

 

If OP were to take this to small claims court, it would be up to the judge to decide on the balance of probabilities on the following:

 

- did the stewart in fact say to put it through his insurance or not?

- were the markers sufficiently visible?

- was lighting sufficient for its purpose?

etc...

 

and would then decide accordingly.

 

What I can't understand is why OP hasn't simply passed it to Motability insurance to pursue. The car is after all a lease car, and I fail to see why OP can't simply say to Motobality: Here's the details of the stewart, he has refused to cooperate, you deal with it. It is a fully comp insurance, so I don't see why any insured person, least of all a disabled one, should be doing their legwork!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What I can't understand is why OP hasn't simply passed it to Motability insurance to pursue. The car is after all a lease car, and I fail to see why OP can't simply say to Motobality: Here's the details of the stewart, he has refused to cooperate, you deal with it. It is a fully comp insurance, so I don't see why any insured person, least of all a disabled one, should be doing their legwork!

 

I too wonder why you havent passed this on, I cant see you winning it tbh, you will lose your 75xs and your £200 good condition bonus which has nothing to do with NCB, the RSA Motability scheme does not give NCB at all, they will only issue a letter detailing how long you have been on the scheme and a list of accidents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sort of - but would be grateful for the team's consideration;

 

A few weekends ago the weather was reasonable enough for me to treat my fences with some spray-on preservative for the coming winter (the fence is 1.8m high and made of wood. Shortly after the mamoth task was completed, the girl friend of my next door neighbour comes to the door and says I've 'painted' his car. I told her not to worry, as I'd be out with a bucket of water to clean it up - I explained it wasn't paint but a coloured wax treatment for wood. By the time the kettle had boiled and I had a pail of soapy water and sponse at the ready, I go to my neighbours drive to find the car gone!

 

Later in the week I speak with the neighbour who tells me he had a devil of a job removing the 'paint' and his car bodywork is badly damaged. It transpired that the girl firend went off on a short trip before going to a car wash - this caused the wax to dry making the car washing innefective. He then tried to T-Cut the paintwork in an effort to remove the wax, and has ended up damaging the bodywork further. All this time the girlfirend didn;t tell him it was only wax and not paint.

 

The fence treatment manufacturers (Cuprinol/ICI) advised the recommended removal method is lots of warm soapy water, any stubborn marks will go with weathering.

 

Because of his botched DIY approach to removing the wax, my neighbour subsequently made a claim to his insurers, and said company is now chasing me for the full costs of restoration, which may include a respray. I'm more than indignant at this, as I fail to see why I should be held responsible for consequences not of my making.

 

Sure, I could pass the matter on to my house insurers and let them sort it out, but I feel there is a modest principle at stake, and if someone makes an 'accident' worse, then they have to take responsibility for their errors. Or should my insurers be forced to pay for an unjustified car respray because the neighbour (in reality) damaged his own vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get ICIs advice in writing, then reply stating that you will reimburse the cost of washing the car, and not pay for his attempted repairs. Might be better someone with legal background on this one.

 

If one of our customers bodges his repairs and makes it worse then claims, we would pay for the cost of the original repairs, but he would have to pay for any costs that he has caused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got ICI's response in an email, and I've now followed this up with a letter requesting a formal reply. for info, on receiving a claim letter from the Car Insurers, I responded with all the relevant information, along with a cheque for £5.00 to cover the cost of a car wash. They rejected this and sent the cheque back. Assuming it comes to court, at least it could be seen that I attempted to make full restitution - I do home my insurer doesn't roll over....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... I don't think it's that cut and dry (pardon the pun), tbh.

 

The fact is that you did, accidentally or not, spray his car. The g/f drove car to car wash, probably with the idea that better to wash it whilst still wet, not necessarily realising that the stuff would dry before getting to the carwash.

 

I suspect, but I must stress that it's only a suspicion at this point, that there is a case of negligence, and that it points at you. Regardless of what happened afterwards, you were careless by spraying paint on the car, and I think that no matter how you try to justify it by saying they should have listened to you, or let you wash it yourself, there is no guarantee that the car paint would not have been damaged anyway, whatever the paint manufacturers might say to the contrary. The point is that there is no way of checking now, and your action is still what precipitated the chain of events.

 

I hope for your sake that I am wrong, but I think that the way it works, the bucks stops with you. Let us know what happens, I'd be very interested to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely there was some duty to allow him to rectify the problem once he was made aware of the situation?

 

From the sound of it the car wash didnt do the damage attempting to remove the spray with a caustic substance caused the damage so surely that should be negligence of the owner too.

 

If I had something like that on my car I would have been taking professional advice before butchering the paint on my car

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...