Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unenforceable Credit Card/Loan Agreements


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4923 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Are there any subscribers out there who have any experience of the suggested loopholes in the Consumer Credit Act that allow for debt to be written off and in some cases even refunds of past payments.

 

There are a number of firms offering this service (for quite hefty fees). Do they work? Is it a [problem]?

 

Tony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The general consensus is that [a] they give no guarantees, and they don't do anything you couldn't do yourself after a little research.

 

The expression you use 'written off' is one that you probably won't find as such on their websites. The Consumer Credit Act (CCA) specifies a number of points that must be included in a credit agreement for the agreement to be compliant. In days gone by many lenders (banks, finance companies and credit card companies) issued agreements that did not properly comply with the CCA. These are not 'loopholes' in the Act but rather lenders not properly complying with it.

 

If an agreement is not compliant then it becomes unenforceable - the lender cannot enforce repayment through the court but you still owe the money. However, in practice any lender who cannot enforce repayment is going to write the debt off, if for no other reason than it is deductible for tax purposes.

 

In determining whether an agreement is compliant some lenders are able to convince the courts that any minor infractions are immaterial to the agreement as a whole. Hence it is a dangerous road to go down if you try and guarantee that any deficiency is enough for the agreement as a whole to be inadmissable in court. That's why these firms you refer to don't offer guarantees (other than they will take your money). It might be worth asking if they will work on commission.:)

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello Hopster,

 

Yes I got your reply - thanks very much.

 

Please keep me posted. I will be very interested to see how you get on.

 

I'm chatting to an organisation called Credit Clear. I'm very tempted...

 

Regards,

 

 

Tony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit clear. £495 for the first then £295 thereafter ? Is that the same firm ? Have you thought of asking them for a reference ? I will be most interested if you speak to a happy client of theirs. Let's keep in close touch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've just reduced their charges to £295.00 per case across the board. I asked if they could provide references but they pointed out that as they only really started in April, the cases they're dealing with are only now just starting to come to fruition. They also (correctly I assume) that data protection regs would prevent them from offering out their customer details etc.

 

Their website is slick and they appear professional. They have Ministry of Justice authorisation and OFT registration. They are very friendly on the phone.

 

The suggestion on these forums is that you could do it yourself. Anyone could do a CCA and get their agreement sent to them, however you really do need an expert to decide if the breaches are strong enough to force a lender into capitulation.

 

I've got several potential agreements that could benefit from scrutiny. May try them with one initially and see what happens.

 

Tony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's them. I have spoken to them. Why have they reduced their fees I wonder. They were definitely £495 for the first. I am trying out another firm and they are going to have to perform soon - default notice already expired - not to worry I am told. I will keep you posted. We could try out one together, absolutely in harness so to speak. What do you think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will tell you later but the c/c is Egg. I am lining up Halifax for them next - in fact I have already sent them the c/c agreement for which paid £1 (usual form)- but I have not paid them to take it further - yet. I have suggested that I pay them monthly in three parts and they do not seem averse to this. It is beginning to sound too easy and very cheap. Where are you ? I think that we might try one together and do it ourselves. We have the templates of the required letters and there seems to be help at hand here in the Forum. Which credit cards do you want looked at ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

spottydog246

 

Hi all,

I have been reading the post s about the loans and credit cards be unenfocreable and have some questions.

1 Iam on a debt management plan am i still able to chalange these loans/cc.

2.What are the time lenths involved with the requests.

3.If an agreement is wrong when do you stop paying for it.

4.Do i have inform the dmp company of what i am doing or will the companies do that.

5.Are there standard letters on the site that i could use.

would be extremely grateful for any help or advice that could be given to me as dmp is currently about 22 yrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have sent a CCA request to all on my creditors now. Only 1 replied with the original true signed copy (egg), a letter from moorcroft re lloyds tsb loan saying that they didn't have the agreement for me yet, and the accound is on hold, a prompt default letter from capital one, and nothing yet from the other 3. I sent off another letter yesterday to follow up... I am cancelling all my payments to them now... i got nothing to lose so....

 

I had heard of these companis before asking for £495 + 295 there after, and guessed that they may just be doing this....

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya guys

 

i had a leaflet drop these companies are popping up all over now, but be careful they charge upfront fees and its not guarranteed, i gave my leaflet to the trading standards team i visited to get them to view my cca id already requested myself, they were going to pass onto another team who are investigating these companies,

 

if the cca is enforceable, you will have paid that amount of money for what??//

 

i dont know up to you but im guessing depends how much you have on each account does it make it worth it?

 

im not too sure im going via the advice here and im already challenging all and got 3 to the fos for further clarification and complaint

 

take care ciao maz

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Good morning,

 

Might I add all you read here is true, if the loan, credit card or HP was before 06/04/07 then the chance the bank holds the originonal agreement is very slim. There are at least 33 million credit cards in circulation, how many people do the banks need to employ?

 

Deed of Assignmant is as discribed, debt is sold in bundles of 1000's do you think for one second the banks bother to complete the paper work.

 

Look at the rules on CCJ challenge everything!

 

One point though if you were sent a document how would you know if it was legal? I have seen documents dated 2009 claiming to be "origionals" you will need advice one firm who does supply legal advice in this area is Guardian/Credit issues, I suggest you Google their web site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help needed I am currently strugling financially and have reed info on unenforcable CCA i need help am in payment plans etc one company defaulted me others threatened it and with another one even though have been paying set amount every month by standing order and the amount now should be aprox 600 pounds the figure is actually double plus few pounds.

 

the companys in particuler are

1. Allience and Liecester loan for £9400 was charged interest on this and over £2000 ppi which i have never been able to claim stand at aprox £4000 have paid £50 per month.

 

2. Morgan stanley Card became goldfish now BC platinum orig credit card limit 2800 now down to about 2500 payment protection orig on card had this stoped years ago

 

3.Barclay Card Gold stood at over 4000 with charges ppi etc down to 2900 aprox pay £38 payment plan strugling mind have not paid yet this month.

 

4. Egg card 6000 or there abouts orig sold to CSL have paid this DCA upto 70 per month not paid last couple of months problems with cash flow...

 

5. Marbles card pay 12.50 p month fixed payment plan belive maxed out card £800 plus fees and charges reaced aprox £450 have paid this figure since March 2005 so will of paid in excess of £600 but balance stands at £1239 supposed to be intrest free no late charges etc company who have taken over marbles are investigating and they lost my last payment too

 

6 Capital 1 not bothered about this as owe less then £200 and this does come down lowest owed these in last 12 months was £10.00

 

I had load for goods years ago but paid this off and i did pay ppi which i could not use

 

 

Any help would be gratfully recived

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all , am reading this thread withinterest.

 

iowe nationwide abpprox 10k on a loan.

if we sent off for this lette rand they fail to respond in the time limit, im confused to how the debt becomes un enforceable, yet we still owe them the money.

 

for clarifcations sake, and befor emyself and wife go for this...

 

if we do still owen them the money - where does this show up? would it still show on credit ref agenceies as an unpaid debt and we still owe £10k, but the bank cannot legally persue us through the courts, and we cannot have our home repososed or anything liek that? (or worse they put some judgement against our name worsending our credit score?)

 

so is it like a stalemate? we still owe them, but we stop payign them, they cannot peruse us, and essentially myself and wife are £297pm better off each month ; )

 

have i understood this correctly?

 

appreciate any feedback.

 

thanks

 

P

:) sucessfully reclaimed against the following in last 4 yrs (thanks to you all and this site) :-

HSBC x 2 accounts,

CAPITAL ONE c/card x 2 accounts

LLOYDS TSB (loan and account charges)

BLACKHORSE FINANCE (2 x loans)

PPI insurance (3 x loans)

 

Currently Persuing:-

BARCLAYS PARTNER FINANCE - HP

CAPITAL ONE - AGAIN! (CCA/DEFAULT/plus charges!):evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The general consensus is that [a] they give no guarantees, and they don't do anything you couldn't do yourself after a little research.

 

The expression you use 'written off' is one that you probably won't find as such on their websites. The Consumer Credit Act (CCA) specifies a number of points that must be included in a credit agreement for the agreement to be compliant. In days gone by many lenders (banks, finance companies and credit card companies) issued agreements that did not properly comply with the CCA. These are not 'loopholes' in the Act but rather lenders not properly complying with it.

 

If an agreement is not compliant then it becomes unenforceable - the lender cannot enforce repayment through the court but you still owe the money. However, in practice any lender who cannot enforce repayment is going to write the debt off, if for no other reason than it is deductible for tax purposes.

 

In determining whether an agreement is compliant some lenders are able to convince the courts that any minor infractions are immaterial to the agreement as a whole. Hence it is a dangerous road to go down if you try and guarantee that any deficiency is enough for the agreement as a whole to be inadmissable in court. That's why these firms you refer to don't offer guarantees (other than they will take your money). It might be worth asking if they will work on commission.:)

 

Hi

 

I refere to your 3rd paragraph in which I determine from your explanation the fact that the dca/oc will deem the debt unenforcable without an active/current cca? and although (we still owe the money) why would they write it of? why wouldnt they challenge their t+c's in court?.

However I do understand , but sometimes with all the crap agy's are sprouting some thing that is understood with the help from yourself and the other caggers is made difficult by others who'm seeemingly want our money to do what we can do?.

 

Thankyou

 

Mr W

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies.

 

im still confused though, if i decide to stop paying my loan repayment because it is un enforcebale, then how can the bank then take me to court, how can the bank/lender convince the courts... if theyre not meant to be allowed to go there in the first place becuase its unenforcebale!

 

it seems a bit too good to be true imo.

 

im sure theres a rational explanation, but if someone could break it down into laymans terms for me id be most greatful.

 

also like to hear of anyone whos had any sucess in this department. is it common? our nationwide loan for 25k was taken out in 2005. have 10k left to pay. in these hard times and with 3 kids to feed i could do with freeing up our £300pm loan repayment to other household bills!

 

but what happens the this debt? if we still owe them and they cant chase us for it does it still show up on a credit search as 'outstanding/unpaid/not settled/in dispute'?

 

cheers

 

P

:) sucessfully reclaimed against the following in last 4 yrs (thanks to you all and this site) :-

HSBC x 2 accounts,

CAPITAL ONE c/card x 2 accounts

LLOYDS TSB (loan and account charges)

BLACKHORSE FINANCE (2 x loans)

PPI insurance (3 x loans)

 

Currently Persuing:-

BARCLAYS PARTNER FINANCE - HP

CAPITAL ONE - AGAIN! (CCA/DEFAULT/plus charges!):evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be wrong and there areseriouslt better informed caggers on thisc site but I understand that the Consumer credit Act applies only to credit card debts and not loans and overdrafts. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

 

It aplies to Credit cards, loans under £25,000 and HP. Overdrafts I suggest yout would need expert advice. But must have been taken out before 06/04/07. The older they are the better usually

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies.

 

im still confused though, if i decide to stop paying my loan repayment because it is un enforcebale, then how can the bank then take me to court, how can the bank/lender convince the courts... if theyre not meant to be allowed to go there in the first place becuase its unenforcebale!

 

it seems a bit too good to be true imo.

 

im sure theres a rational explanation, but if someone could break it down into laymans terms for me id be most greatful.

 

also like to hear of anyone whos had any sucess in this department. is it common? our nationwide loan for 25k was taken out in 2005. have 10k left to pay. in these hard times and with 3 kids to feed i could do with freeing up our £300pm loan repayment to other household bills!

 

but what happens the this debt? if we still owe them and they cant chase us for it does it still show up on a credit search as 'outstanding/unpaid/not settled/in dispute'?

 

cheers

 

P

Hi

 

Simple answer is yes, all teh questions you have can be answered, all in your favor. May I suggest you visit credit issues web site?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for reply.

 

if our loan amount was for 25k, will we still qualify as its right on the threshold?

:) sucessfully reclaimed against the following in last 4 yrs (thanks to you all and this site) :-

HSBC x 2 accounts,

CAPITAL ONE c/card x 2 accounts

LLOYDS TSB (loan and account charges)

BLACKHORSE FINANCE (2 x loans)

PPI insurance (3 x loans)

 

Currently Persuing:-

BARCLAYS PARTNER FINANCE - HP

CAPITAL ONE - AGAIN! (CCA/DEFAULT/plus charges!):evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...