Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Banks have different limits above which they require Probate. So it may be Probate is not needed, although as he died with no Will that could complicate things. Is all the £28k with Virgin Money? Your wife should contact all banks who hold his money with the death certificate and ask them what they need to release the funds to her. Most banks have a central "bereavement department". Check their websites. Use that department rather than general call centre or bank branch. Your wife may also have to provide evidence that she is his daughter. When his wife died it sounds like they had a joint bank account so that's why her money just went across to him. But as it isn't a joint account now transfer to your wife won't be quite that simple.  
    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Marlins Claimform - old LLoyds loan no CCA-**WON..DISC'D+COSTS**


wakeywakey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, sent the AQ couple of days late. Didnt receive anything from claimants.

Had General form of Judgement today from the court stating that Claimants have till 15th Dec to file their AQ (and fee), then the claim shall stand struck out and the claimant pay the costs of the defendant, to be assessed, at the request of the defendant.

Goes on to say that anyone affected have 7 days to have it varied, stayed or set aside.

 

Not sure what that all means, presumably they haven't sent in their AQ?

But what does "struck out" actually mean for me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They havent yet filed their AQ, two things will be on their mind.

1 they will be concerned because their case is weak, your defence is good

2 They have to pay a fee to file theirs (more wasted money if they lose)

 

Phone the court on the 16th Dec to ask if the claim will be struck out, but dont be surprised it isn't done straight away, the courts give claimants far more leeway than defendants, it could take another two weeks after that.

 

That said if its struck out you have won, they have lost, and you claim your costs against them.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I think this could be good news but not sure!

Received in post today a "Notice of Discontinuance" from their solicitors.

 

It states:-

 

To the court

The claimant discontinues All of this claim against the defendant.

(....................................................(enter name of judge) granted permission for the claimant to discontinue (all) (part) of this (claim) (counterclaim) by order dated.............................................)

I certify that I have served a copy of this notice on every other party to the proceedings

Signed (it is signed) position- Litigation Assistant

Dated (it is dated)

Just worried why the judges name wasnt entered in the given permission part?

What do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great news and should be read by anyone being threatened with the Rankine judgement just going back to your first post where they replied

 

Please be aware that a recent High Court judgement held that once a credit agreement has been terminated the obligation to provide a copy agreement in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ceases to apply. There is therefore no penalty for our being unable to provide the copy agreement and, more particularly, the debt remains enforcable against you.

 

This means that you remain liable to pay the debt and that Arrow Global Ltd will be entitled to take enforement action against you to recover it. This could include seeking a County Court judgement against you and, if awarded and the judgement amount is not paid according to the judgement, seeking an enforcment order such as a charging order, attachment of earnings order or attendance of a bailiff to seize and sell your non-essential property to pay down the debt

 

They obviously didn't have the confidence to use this in court and should give heart to anyone who is being threatened by this now...

  • Haha 1

Live Life-Debt Free

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please, someone put me out my misery!!

Is it all over?

What about the fact the Judge wasnt named or dated?

What do I need to do now?

 

Right

 

 

firstly, in the morning, call the court and check if the notice has been filed with them

 

if it has then its case closed game over

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoned Court this morning.

They didnt say received "Notice of Discontinuence" but they said the claimant has decided not to proceed and dropped the case.

 

Presumably, they mean the same thing?

 

So my questions now are.

 

1. People on here have said to go for costs, but how would I go about that and would it be another court case?

 

2. Does this mean they can't badger me for the debt?

 

3. Do I not have to do anything else regarding this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The text of the notice set out at post no 103 is the text found in a N279 Notice of Discontinuance.

 

CPR 38.6 therefore applies.

 

x20

what X20 is saying, is you have them by the short and curlys and its time to squeeze

 

they have chosen to discontinue the claim and as a result fall liable for your costs incurred in defending this action

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO you have a free pdf viewer?

 

If not, you can download one HERE

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

x20

I have a couple of questions re: your LiP draft bill.

 

1. In section 7, you have the following

Receiving and considering Notice of Discontinuance (1 hr) £9.25

 

What does this mean? As how can you consider a discontinuence notice, surely you just receive it and thats it?

Did I need to do anything about the discontinuence notice I received?

 

2. In the summary, you have -Disbursements (court fee) £75.00

Is that where someone has paid the £75 to have it set aside?

If so, I presume as mine was a discontinuence I don't apply that cost?

Sorry to need more answers, its all a learning curve isn't it?

But thanks very much for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

x20, I have listed my questions regarding the N252 AND Bill as I am unsure of a number of things.

 

1. In section 7, you have the following

Receiving and considering Notice of Discontinuance (1 hr) £9.25

What does this mean? As how can you consider a discontinuence notice, surely you just receive it and thats it?

Did I need to do anything about the discontinuence notice I received (send to court)?

2. If I sign the N252, maybe, just maybe, they would see my signature and reopen the case (if you know what I mean)

So how about I just print my name there?

3. Although I researched this part I didnt actually get a hearing date, so should I omit the "Research regarding detailed assessment proceedings and Litigate in Person (costs and expenses)?

4. How do I change the text on your Bill to suit my own needs?

5. What are my chances of a succesful costs case?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q1

When you received the Notice of Discontinuance surely that wasn't just it? Unless you were a total genius on the ins and outs of Notices of Discontinuance you'd want to know what it meant and the knock on consequences in terms of the case and any future litigation. That's what that hour was all about. May be it was for longer but you just lost track of time. ;)

 

Q2

I shouldn't get paranoid about your signature. Change it if you want to. The writing will still be under your hand.

 

Q3

Nope keep it in. Unless I'm very muich mistaken you're researching detailed assessment proceedings and the Litigant in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act right now.

 

Q4

Can't help you there. You would need to have fancy and expensive Adobe Acrobat. The cheaper (and as intended by me) method is to re-type the material so as to create a bespoke bill for your particular case.

 

Q5

You're three-quarters of the way there in the sense rules of court direct you are entitled to costs and you have the means to produce a compliant bill of costs and begin detailed assessment proceedings. The only outstanding matter is 'how much' and that sure ain't nil.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, excellant advice as usual.

 

I am going to have to re-write the bill and I am then sending to them.

 

I did initailly feel a bit guilty asking for costs, but I gotta say, I dont now.

 

I have spent so much time trying to stop these vultures as we all do and we deserve some recompense.

 

Thanks again for everyones help, especially x20

 

I will let you know what happens

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doh, just hit a snag with the first part of the bill.

Your Draft states--

 

The Claimant commenced proceedings in relation to an agreement regulated under The

Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Claimant was the assignee of a judgment obtained by the

original creditor to the agreement in the Shoreditch County Court in 1993. The proceedings

constituted relitigation and were an abuse of process. The proceedings were defended and

the Defendant applied to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out.

 

How do I change that to suit me. It was a county court claim as opposed to a judgement, so do I just chabge that part?

Edited by wakeywakey
fonts not right
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...