Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread title updated. so a sold debt. who are the solicitors? TM legal? why didn't ovo do this themselves as they do but chose to sell the debt on for 10p=£1? funny debt you state you reived a letter of claim, why did you not reply too it.? also is there is no indication of the date this bill comes from on the claimform? how do you know its from 2022? what other previous paperwork have you received? please scan page 1 of the claimform and bothsides of ALL previous letters upto one mass pdf read upload carefully. .................. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Thank you again. I'm hoping it will come out in the wash and will endeavour to check my online account. I'm a bit unsettled by not hearing from Booking.com but the host is sounding helpful at the moment. HB
    • I've just remembered that a friend of mine had bookings cancelled on Booking.com about a month ago - and the good news is that all worked out in the wash. I'm at work now but will scribble properly in a couple of hours with the full tale.
    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 22 May 2024  Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. 2. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. 3. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300 and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984. What is the total value of the claim? £385 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier What was the date of your last payment? Never  Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guesty vs Barclays COME ON!!


rachaelc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey there!!

I have been taking the wonderful advice from this website and have finally decided to act on my partners unfair bank charges, sent the preliminary letter to barclays and got 'Sorry you're not happy, here's £285 of the £735 your claiming to bugger off' so we said 'thank you for the £285, we'll take that for now, but will pursue for the rest, ad if you dont give it 2us, we'll get the interst aswell totla £900!!' sent that letter yesterday, so just waiting 14 days to enter it in to court, then fingers crossed!!

 

(Of course, i didnt actually word the letters like that!!)

 

If all goes well with this then we will start with my OH's credit cards - o what fun!!! Ill keep all posted - and thank you all for your help so far!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved letter from barclays today - 'we are sorry you are not happy with the offer we have made for £285 in full and final settlement - so we'll see you in court'

 

Im guessing this is the standard letter? Do i just do a money claim online now and add the 8% interest?

 

Any advice greatly appreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do but the better way of doing it would be to pop down to your local court and do it there, then you can enclose a schedule of charges to save any delays. The form to fill in is available as a PDF in the templates section of the library and you can do it on the computer and print it out.

 

Love the paraphrased letter!

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll defend at last minute with a stock defence - one size fits all so you can pick holes in almost every paragraph.

Be sure to send a shedule of charges directly to Barclays legal peeps after they have filed defence.

If they don't file defence in time, go for judgement by default. They will probably apply for setaside but its all part of the fun :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't have put it better myself.

Barclays defence, well there's less holes in a colinder. They will still push all the way until just before court with it. I'm returning the Allocation Questionnairre on Friday.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Standard procedure for Barclays.

The next step is that Barclays will enter a defence, (bless!) :D

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey all, Have received Barclays defence, and its quite long one – is that normal?1. The particulars of claim are summary and do not provide details or particulars of the account in question and/or the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. Accordingly, this defence is summary in nature and the Defendant reserves the right to amend this Statement of Case in due course. It is averred that the Claimant has failed to identify and state any cause of action against the Defendant o establish any legal liability for the sum claimed.2. Notwithstanding the Claimant’s failure to correctly identify and particularise an account held with the Defendant. It is admitted that he Claimant has an account number ******** sort code ******. However, to the extent it is alleged that the unpaid fees for returned cheques, ‘paid referral fees’ or any such fees, the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof.3. The Defendant is entitled to charge the Claimant for unauthorised borrowings by reason of its standard terms and conditions. The Claimant accepted the same when the account was opened, including (in particular but without limitation) the following terms and conditions(which are summarised);a) The Defendants tight to charge a ‘paid referral fee’ where the defendant pays an amount (either by compulsion or election) which causes the account to become overdrawn - £30 per item (previously £25)b) The Defendant’s right to charge the administrative fee id any cheque, standing order or direct debit cannot be paid because of insufficient cleared funds in the account - £35 per item (previously £30.c) The Defendants entitlement, if the claimant becomes overdrawn without an overdraft limit, to charge interest at the unauthorised borrowing rate on the excess balance.4. The Defendants’ standard terms and conditions give the Claimant a fair and transparent view of those terms and the charges applicable for unauthorised borrowing (including where the Claimant exceeds his authorised overdraft limit.)5. If and to the extent it is the Claimants case that the failure to make necessary breach of the terms applying to the account and that contratuctual entitlement to the debit charges from the Claimants account constitutes a liquidated damage clause, the same is denied. The charges constitute payments the Claimant agreed to make by reason of the terms and conditions of his account and were consideration for the obligation to advance. The Defendant was entitled to impose such charges and interest when the Claimant incurred the overdraft.6. Accordingly it is denied that the legal principles relating to liquidated damages clauses and penalty charges are relevant or applicable to the fact set out above. Further or alternatively it is denied that any such charges constitute unlawful penalty charges or are in breach of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (particularly but without limitations to, paragraph 1(e) of Schedule 2), or are in breach of s.4 of the Unfair (Contracts_ Terms Act 1977 (or any other provision) or are unreasonable within the meaning of s.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (or indeed any other provision)7. Therefore, it is denied that the charges were unlawfully debited from the account.8. If and to the extent the Claimant incurred charges on his account, this was caused by the Claimant having gone into overdraft without having agreed with the Defendant to increase the overdraft facility and/or his failure to make payments to bring the balance of the account back into credit and/or to bring the account back within the authorised overdraft limit.9. It is averred that the said charges and interest are and remain lawful and enforceable and that the Defendant was entitled to debit the same.10. The defendant denies that it is liable to the Claimant for the sums claimed and interested as pleased by the Claimant or at all.11. In the alternative, and without prejudice to paragraph 7 above, if (which is denied) the said charges and interest or any part thereof are unlawful or unenforceable as alleged by the Claimant or at all, the Defendant has nonetheless suffered loss and damage as a consequence of the Claimants breach of contract in that the Defendant is unable to rely on its express entitlement to enforce the charges set out at paragraphs 3 to 5 and 7 above, it will seek to recover to the necessarily be limited to the value of the said charges, and the Defendant seeks to set off such sums against any liability owed hereunder to the Claimant. What do I do now????

 

What do i send to barclays, the court etc?

 

Also have the allocation questionnaire to fill in, do I have to pay any additional costs as one of the question is ‘Have you attached the fee for filing this allocation questionnaire?’ In the notes it states that ‘If you do not pay this fee it might lead to your claim being struck out.

 

HELP PLEASE?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rachael,

 

I'm just behind you waiting for Barclays to file defense (they have until 28/08/06). Anyway, send a list of your charges to Barclays solicitors, like the list you included with you request for repayment. With regard to the AQ, have a read of some of the other threads, there's a couple that detail what needs to be done, there's also some info in the template section I believe.

 

Hope that's some help. Keep going!

Barclays

Data Protection Act Request Sent 13/06/06

Statements received 20/06/06

Request for repayment sent 22/06/06

LBA sent 07/07/06

Claim sumitted 22/07/06 £2510.86 total

Claim acknowleged 08/08/06

AQ returned 06/09/06

Court Date set for 22/12/06

MBNA - £348 settled in full

HSBC - £1168 settled in full

cahoot - £100 settled in full

Link to post
Share on other sites

o dear, just been trying to sort out the original table i used to get the charges plus interest ans cant find it, have been playing round with the number (increasing and deacreasing0 the days since offense but i cant get the numbers to match!! Help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send a list of the charges you are claiming back to both the Court and Barclays solicitors.

There is a comprehensive guide to filling out your AQ in the templates library but here it is:

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

[EDITED: PLEASE DO NOT POST LIBRARY MATERIAL OUTSIDE THE LIBRARY, IT IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO REGISTERED USERS FOR A REASON]

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

You have to pay the Court an additional £100 (include a cheque with your AQ) if your claim is over £1500

 

Don't panic you have 14days to respond

 

Hope this helps

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

:eek: We have recieved a letter from our local court today for a 'General Form of Judgement or order' it also states 'It is ordered that the claimant has not established the legal basis of his claim and must therefore do so by filing further and better particulars of the claim by 4pm 27th November'

 

WHAT THE HELL DO I DO NOW? HAVE I DONE SOMETHING WRONG IN FILLING THE FORMS OUT?

 

I NEED YOUR HELP!!!:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey there here are the particulars, any help greatly appreciated!!!

 

 

 

 

In Respect of:

Amount

Date Incurred

Days since offence

Interest 8% APR

Paid referral fee

£20.00

08/02/2001

2065

£9.09

Paid referral fee

£20.00

12/03/2001

2033

£8.95

Paid referral fee

£20.00

16/05/2002

1603

£7.05

Paid referral fee

£20.00

10/07/2002

1548

£6.81

Paid referral fee

£20.00

08/10/2002

1458

£6.42

Paid referral fee

£20.00

10/10/2002

1456

£6.41

Paid referral fee

£20.00

15/10/2002

1451

£6.38

Paid referral fee

£20.00

31/12/2002

1374

£6.05

Paid referral fee

£20.00

08/01/2003

1366

£6.01

Paid referral fee

£20.00

09/01/2003

1365

£6.01

Paid referral fee

£20.00

13/01/2003

1361

£5.99

Paid referral fee

£20.00

08/05/2003

1246

£5.48

Paid referral fee

£20.00

10/06/2003

1213

£5.34

Paid referral fee

£20.00

19/06/2003

1204

£5.30

Paid referral fee

£20.00

07/07/2003

1186

£5.22

Paid referral fee

£20.00

08/07/2003

1185

£5.21

Paid referral fee

£20.00

09/07/2003

1184

£5.21

Paid referral fee

£20.00

28/08/2003

1134

£4.99

Paid referral fee

£20.00

29/08/2003

1133

£4.99

Paid referral fee

£20.00

04/09/2003

1127

£4.96

Paid referral fee

£25.00

30/09/2003

1101

£6.06

Paid referral fee

£25.00

03/10/2003

1098

£6.04

Unpaid Direct Debit

£30.00

03/10/2003

1098

£7.25

Paid referral fee

£25.00

06/10/2003

1095

£6.02

Paid referral fee

£25.00

07/10/2003

1094

£6.02

Unpaid Direct Debit

£30.00

08/10/2003

1093

£7.21

Paid referral fee

£25.00

04/12/2003

1036

£5.70

Paid referral fee

£25.00

18/10/2004

717

£3.94

Paid referral fee

£25.00

16/05/2005

507

£2.79

Paid referral fee

£25.00

17/05/2005

506

£2.78

Paid referral fee

£25.00

25/05/2005

498

£2.74

Paid referral fee

£25.00

19/12/2005

290

£1.60

Paid referral fee

£25.00

04/01/2006

274

£1.51

£735.00

£181.49

£916.49

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that what you put as "Particulars of claim" on your court claim?

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you seem to have done it seems is to use your "schedule of charges" in place of your "particulars of claim".

 

You now, as I see it from what the court has sent you, need to send them the correct "particulars of claim", which should read something like this;

 

 

 

 

The claimant has had a contract with the defendant (Sort Code XX-XX-XX Account Number XXXXXXXtheir (Sort Code XX-XX-XX Account Number XXXXXXXX) since XXXX which is conducted on their standard terms and conditions. The claimant claims the return of £735.00 levied by the defendant in the way of charges over the last six years. The charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2 (1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty, they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. The defendant has been asked to justify the charges but they have failed to do so.

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts

Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 08/02/2001 to [insert claim date] of

£181.49 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of

judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.16.

 

A schedule is attached which lists the disproportionate fees applied

by the defendant during the last six years to the claimants bank

account.

 

 

 

This should be sent, quoting your case number, along with another copy of your schedule, to both the court and the defendant.

 

 

Hope that's the right advice!

 

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...