Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking Eye Penalty - Aldi Upminster


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

New to the site but exteremly impressed. Those answering the majority of these threads - thank you!!

 

Inevitably I have received a charge of £50 (£40 if paid by 22/8/08) for supposedly staying in the above car park for 12 mins longer than I should.

 

Unfortunately I had phoned these jokers before I started research (schoolboy error I know) and all but admitted I was the driver.

 

However having seen the error of my ways I have read the advice posted by petej2811 which looks to be a work of genius and have drafted a letter to Parking Eye and DVLA.

 

I have picked up all three points, (contract and damages, DVLA misuse and Unfair Terms) and I have as advised told them not to contact me again and quoted the Protection From Harrasment Act.

 

Do you know of anyone where this letter has worked first time?

 

If not and the letters keep coming do I report them to the Police for harrasment?

 

What sort of reponse do we get from the Police?

 

Thanks for you help people

Link to post
Share on other sites

the phone call is irrelevant - why do you think all the PPCs only accept written 'appeals' and none over the phone.

Could be much more than Harassment involved - we haven't seen all of the paperwork. A good stroll around here will pick up posts on several other potentially applicable Acts.

I wouldn't waste my time writing to Parking Eye - do you expect them to hold their hands up and say "Yes, you are correct out invoices are unenforceable rubbish. Thanks for pointing that out, we will close the business today and pursue an honest living instead."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Duly noted. I did query it fairly strongly over the phone but as expected they ignored me. I guess I was just looking for a certaintity - no such thing I am guessing.

 

I'll send the letter anyway (I've just paid the postage) they might get the message and just write it off (here's hoping!).

 

Thanks for the reply though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thought I would post an update. Still shaking with anger!!

 

They phoned me, didn't say who they were when they left a message and I phoned a number back - for the benefit of others the number they called from was 0870 4584285 and asked me to call 0845 6329692.

 

Anyway I realised who it was when they answered the phone and then they demanded that I pay the £40. I told them to leave me alone and if they want me to pay take me to court. I said I didn't believe it was a breach of contract and could they stop contacting me.

 

The bloody nerve of these people.

 

Interesting that they only want the £40 not the £70 which it should be by now!

 

Assuming they do take me to court (long shot I know) and I lose (even longer shot!) does this count as a CCJ? Or do I then have to not pay that to get a CCJ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is hypothetical but yes - it would stand as a CCJ. However, for this to affect your credit rating it would have to become an "outstanding CCJ" - that is that you don't settle payment within the stipulated period. Credit agencies have access to these lists of outstanding CCJs. Normal judgements, settled within the time period do not get on to these lists in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help Barnsley Boy.

 

Do you know of anyone that has actually lost one of these claims?

I don't know of anyone who's lost using the defenses mentioned in the PPC guide in the stickies section.

 

Occassionally the PPC's will record a "win" through a no show in court or through the ignorance of a defendant.

 

By far the majority of people on these forums receive a handful of toilet paper, sorry, I mean threatening letters and then hear nothing more. :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The small claims court is a bit of a "quick and dirty" form of justice. It is quite possible for a PPC to win against a poor defence or a no show. We've yet to hear of a win against a "proper" defence.

 

No worries with Parking Eye, they have already shot their bolt in their "notice to owner" which states that the registered keeper is liable!!! Simply NO CHANCE of Parking Eye wishing to have their paperwork scrutinised by a court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Grippy,

Follow these rules:

1) Under NO circumstances even think about paying these unenforceable invoices.

2) If feeling a bit wobbly and unsure, refer to rule 1

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats right, there will be letters, but now you know what to expect, you can be happy and ignore them. They will try and up the scare tactics with fantasy stories of, COURT ACTION, BAILIFFS, FIELD AGENTS, but just ignore them and they will go away and chase other more vulnerable people.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update;

 

Received what I assume to be standard letter number two. This one has pretty pictures of my car on it. I have 4 days to pay £40 or it goes up to £70 plus the possiblity of "many additional charges".

 

Rest assured I am standing firm!

 

I've been contacted twice in 6 days, guess they are trying the 'shock and awe' tactick. Thanks to this forum I am neither shocked nor awed, thank you!!

 

I'll post future updates as they happen.

 

Cheers people

 

Grippy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Grippy,

Very glad to hear you are standing firm on this matter.

Keep us updated and feel free to post any letters, minus personal details to give us all a good laugh.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, don't know if it's relevant but it may be should this matter ever reach the courts.

 

The car park for Aldi in Upminster is not owned by Aldi, it is leased by them from Havering Council. If I understand some of what I've read, both the parking firm and Aldi must be licensed to hold the Data from CCTV images (& probably the council too).

 

This may form a good basis for any court claim to be thrown out ( but I'm sure those of a legal persuasion will correct me if necessary)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

I have also recieved a "Parking Charge Reminder" from Parking Eye for an Aldi carpark. Having read thro' all the posts realised that it was nothing more than a sham. I spent a few hours last night composing various letters from the excellent templates available, then I had a rare and consise thought.

This morning I called Aldi, explained why we were late getting back to the car (having been shopping within the store) and they immeadiately offered to cancel this "charge". The person I spoke to was very reasonable and after a few minutes admitted that the whole scheme has been a disaster and they cannot wait to get rid of Parking Eye. Even Aldi descibed the parking charges as "borderline" and Parking Eye to be Cowboys which is being generous.

I explined that despite Parking Eye being members of the BPA (but strangley with 2 membership numbers??) they do not follow the BPA guidence document in several aspects and as part of their agreement with the DVLA they are bound by all aspects of the BPA, therefore they unlawfully aquired my details from the DVLA.

So I call on anyone who has recieved a "parking Notice Charge" or alike to, in the first instant, contact the retail outfit, they rely on your custom to stay in business, they have customer service departments, call them. Its the retailer who controls these Private parking Companies, they pay their wages!

One comment from the person in Aldi was that I was the first "calm" call they had recieved for a long time (I was calm as I knew from this site that I would not be lining Parking Eyes pockets), please when dealing with anyone one over the phone, be polite and consise as this will have 2 effects, to soften the other persons resolve and secondly annoy the crap out them for you not being upset!

 

The BPA is a trade organisation which needs to be lobbied, They do not accept any communication from the general public, I am sure that if they did they would have to expell many of their members. There is a comments section on their website, please use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry i have just phoned the customer service line on the website: 0844 406 8800.

 

They put me through to the regional customer service department, where someone took down my number and asked where I got the charge from. They said someone would call me.

 

I may need to follow that up but it is worth a shot.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...