Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case  when he penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid Student loans 91-94 - living abroad, advice required


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly, I have read all the previous forum entries on SLC and various charges and collection issues, and whilst they have been extremely informative I have found nothing that relates directly to my situation, hence this post.

 

So, first a little background. I took three loans from the SLC during 91-94. In 95 I left the UK for work and have stayed abroad ever since. Initially I simply ignored the letters the SLC sent to my parents UK address, but eventually I contacted the company and asked them to send future correspondence to my address overseas, simply as I did not want the SLC or any of its agents hassling my family.

 

I then applied for deferment on the first loan repayment, supplying the SLC with written confirmation of my earnings, and deferment was duly granted.

 

I did this for several years and all seemed fine; we had simply settled into a nice rhythm it seemed - they sent deferment papers, I sent them back and they were approved.

 

Then, roughly seven years ago I received a letter stating that I owed arrears. I queried this, stating that as per usual I had sent my deferment form back the day after i had received it. The SLC pressed ahead regardless, stating that I owe them money, but did however grant deferment.

 

The following year I received a demand for repayment, and a demand for arrears, plus interest, and a host of other charges (20 pound letters etc).

 

Again I queried this, and sent the SLC a letter stating that I did not acknowledge the arrears and that my deferment was still valid. (After a while i realised the problem - the SLC was posting my deferment form with a second class stamp, and by the time it arrived in my corner of Eastern Europe the deadline to return it had already passed. This I pointed out in my letter, and asked that they make a note of this and pay for postage that might ensure I received the form in good time.)

 

Correspondence then dried up from their side, and, I admit, stupidly, forgot about the alleged debt. Fast forward to around 2004 and a whole barrage of letters from the SLC demanding immediate repayment on the 91 loan, and no more deferment forms for the 92 or 93 loans.

 

I called them and reiterated that I had done nothing wrong, owed them nothing, and that as I did not earn over their threshold was entitled to defer again. The, admittedly very pleasant, person on the SLC help-desk said my concerns would be noted and a letter sent.

 

Yet again, I received no written reply, but 6 months later a deluge of demands from a third party debt collector. They too dried up (i admit I just ignored them), then after another 6 months a futher deluge of letters from a second, and then a third UK debt collector. As it stands, I have received no correspondence from either a collections agency or the SLC in the last 12 months.

 

I continue to earn less than the 23k threshold, and have done each and every year since i left the UK. I have documentation to prove this, but i suspect the time for talking to them is over and deferment is no longer an option. My worry now is that as the country I chose to make my home is now an EU member, they will sell the debt to a local agency and some lunk will come banging on my door to collect what is now a sizeable amount (roughly 5k GBP from recollection - all from an initial arrears charge of approx 250 GBP caused by the SLC's 2nd class postage....)

 

Apologies for the long winded first post, but I'm at a loss about what to do. As I see it, I was following their instructions to the letter, then for some reason and without any real warning they went to defcon 4. I have not tried to hide from the debt - I could simply have chosen not to inform them of my true whereabouts - and have, in the initial phase, been nothing but compliant when asked to provide details of earnings in order to secure deferment.

 

is there anything I can possibly do other than the obvious change of address??

 

many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to the above - I note that other people with similar problems have been advised to go down the CCA/S.A.R route with SLC. Would this be the right place for me to start, as I have no copies of the correspondence and at this point am unsure exactly how much the SLC thinks I owe them. If so, how do I go about this in the correct manner?

 

many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

so, I have decided that I need to sort this out one way or the other, and I'd be grateful for advice on the appropriate course of action. As stated below, I have no real idea what the SLC thinks I owe them at this point so, after looking at a lot of previous threads, I believe I should kick off with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request - as below (these letters are C&P from a previous thread)

 

Student Loans Company Limited,

100 Bothwell Street,

Glasgow,

Scotland.

G2 7JD.

 

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST.

 

Re: Account Number: XXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I hereby make a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and request that the Student Loans Company Ltd. supply me with the following:

 

1) a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my history with your organisation (trading as either the Student Loans Company, Smith Lawson & Co [which I understand to be one and the same], or any other name);

 

2) where there has been any event in my account history which has required manual intervention, disclosure of any indications, notes or other evidence by any member of staff or any other person, which either caused or resulted in manual interventions in relation to my business with you (If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response);

 

3) records of decisions and communications relating to any changes to my credit status/history made by your organisation.

 

I enclose a cheque for the statutory maximum fee of £10 for which I would like a receipt by return of post.

 

As per the Data Protection Act 1998 you have 40 days from the date of this letter in which to comply with this request. Failure to do so fully will be reported to the Information Commissioner and I will seek compensation through the Courts.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

xxxxxxx

 

And also the CAA request as follows:

 

Student Loans Company Limited,

100 Bothwell Street,

Glasgow,

Scotland.

G2 7JD.

 

CONSUMER CREDIT ACT REQUEST

 

Re: Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I hereby request a true copy of the signed agreement for the above account [or accounts if more than one] under the terms of Section 77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, enclosing the statutory maximum fee of £1 per account in the form of a cheque.

 

As outlined in the Act you have 12 days from the date of this letter in which to comply with this request. Failure to do so is a criminal offence under the Act and as such will, in the event of none-compliance, be pursued further with the relevant legal authority.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

xxxxxxxx

 

 

 

Now, I have two problems. Firstly, I live in a country that does not issue chequebooks and I do not have a UK bank account - should I include cash and send recorded delivery/TNT?

 

Secondly, would I be better getting a friend to post the letters from the UK using their return address, or would that somehow implicate them in this sorry mess?

 

Finally, I note that many people suggest writing 'This account is in dispute' at the top of the letters..is this necessary and, or, correct?

 

 

Apologies for seemingly talking to myself, I'm just a bit lost and need to be pointed in the right direction,

 

many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018
so, I have decided that I need to sort this out one way or the other, and I'd be grateful for advice on the appropriate course of action. As stated below, I have no real idea what the SLC thinks I owe them at this point so, after looking at a lot of previous threads, I believe I should kick off with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request - as below (these letters are C&P from a previous thread)

 

Student Loans Company Limited,

100 Bothwell Street,

Glasgow,

Scotland.

G2 7JD.

 

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST.

 

Re: Account Number: XXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I hereby make a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and request that the Student Loans Company Ltd. supply me with the following:

 

1) a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my history with your organisation (trading as either the Student Loans Company, Smith Lawson & Co [which I understand to be one and the same], or any other name);

 

2) where there has been any event in my account history which has required manual intervention, disclosure of any indications, notes or other evidence by any member of staff or any other person, which either caused or resulted in manual interventions in relation to my business with you (If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response);

 

3) records of decisions and communications relating to any changes to my credit status/history made by your organisation.

 

I enclose a cheque for the statutory maximum fee of £10 for which I would like a receipt by return of post.

 

As per the Data Protection Act 1998 you have 40 days from the date of this letter in which to comply with this request. Failure to do so fully will be reported to the Information Commissioner and I will seek compensation through the Courts.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

xxxxxxx

 

And also the CAA request as follows:

 

Student Loans Company Limited,

100 Bothwell Street,

Glasgow,

Scotland.

G2 7JD.

 

CONSUMER CREDIT ACT REQUEST

 

Re: Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I hereby request a true copy of the signed agreement for the above account [or accounts if more than one] under the terms of Section 77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, enclosing the statutory maximum fee of £1 per account in the form of a cheque.

 

As outlined in the Act you have 12 days from the date of this letter in which to comply with this request. Failure to do so is a criminal offence under the Act and as such will, in the event of none-compliance, be pursued further with the relevant legal authority.

The part changed to BLUE is no longer relavent it has been deleted from the CCA 1974.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

xxxxxxxx

 

 

 

Now, I have two problems. Firstly, I live in a country that does not issue chequebooks and I do not have a UK bank account - should I include cash and send recorded delivery/TNT?

IMHO you should never use cash, the reasons are it could be stolen, it might be credited to your account as a payment, restarting the clock and prevents a claim of statue barred.

 

Secondly, would I be better getting a friend to post the letters from the UK using their return address, or would that somehow implicate them in this sorry mess?

It may cause problems, if a DCA is involved, why not ask them to purchase postal orders for the payments,

 

Finally, I note that many people suggest writing 'This account is in dispute' at the top of the letters..is this necessary and, or, correct?

There is no need for this with either a CCA or an SAR.

 

Apologies for seemingly talking to myself, I'm just a bit lost and need to be pointed in the right direction,

 

many thanks in advance

 

Can I ask when did you last have contact with the SLC,

 

Regards

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Andy, thanks for the reply

 

roughly 9 months ago as i recall. A statement. What is interesting is that i have three loans outstanding (91,92,93) but all recent correspondence refers only to the first loan.

 

My position, which is probably naive i admit, is that I contest the arrears and wish to continue to defer as I still earn under the SLC's threshold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Do you intend to return to live in the UK permanently in the future

Edited by old_andrew2007
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi - no plans whatsoever to return.

 

One thing that prompted me to seek out this forum is that a person here in a similar position received a letter from the local unit of EOS Debt Solutions demanding payment. So, I'm also wondering how long the arm of the SLC and its DCAs can extend,

 

many thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Old_andrew2018

The reason for my question on return to the UK is that a debt may become statute Barred after no payment or acknowledgement for six years, I expect to be corrected if I am wrong.

I am aware or should I say I read that some countries have reciprocal agreements with regard to debt collection.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I am in a similar situation although mine are more recent. I have loans from 97, 98, 99 & 00. I have moved abroad this year but have always kept SLC in the loop although admittedly I stopped my Direct Debit as I could not afford the payment and did not have a permanent address. I did however give them an email address and mobile phone number to contact me.

 

I wrote a letter explaining all of the above in Jan and had no contact from SLC, it sat on someones desk with no one doing anything. I then receive a call after being traced demanding payment. I believe I have incurred trace fees, despite all my details at the SLC.

 

I have filled in a deferrment form but they are only back dating to June and not Jan. I am worried they might be able to get the local debt collectors as well. I also believe my account has been overcharged with charges for letters, arrears etc.

 

Is the process to send these two letters off to SLC as the first step? I am not above the minimum threshold.

 

Cheers

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there i see that you have had contact with the SLC so the limitations act of 1980 i am afraid doesnt apply as deferment counts as admittance of liability - the statute barred rule applies if no contact has been made by said company for 6 years you need too ask for your Subject Access File - you dont need to create a missive just ask for it - But if they take more than 30 days (how i understand it ) then the debt is cancelled someone on here can proberly explain it better

Link to post
Share on other sites

just another thought pre 1998 loans are simple CCA they are not linked too your wages so they cant take money from you - my advice forget it move on - but thats your choice - it will proberly show on your credit record so check for that as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need too invoke the six years rule use this letter

 

Liability for debts and the limitation act

4

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account No:____________________________________________

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you

claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple

contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of

action accrued.”

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred

debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during

the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last correspondence/payment/acknowledgement or payment of this debt was made over

six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless

you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me/us in the relevant period under

Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I/we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action

against me/us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a

debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statue barred could amount to

harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above

account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your signature)

 

 

REMEMBER

TO KEEP A COPY OF LETTERS YOU SEND TO YOUR CREDITORS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for this. I have been paying the loan off up to last year, so have been in regular contact and I have been in contact this year. Really, I just want to see my account file to see the charges and notes etc as I believe it will be a mess. So I just send a Subject Access File and they have to respond in 30 days.

 

It is pre 98, can they not send debt collectors around?

 

Is there anyway under the Data Protection Act I can stop them contact previous contacts or sending items of my account to addresses I have not given them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Duty4you - was the advice to just ignore it directed at me? I have not sent the CCA/SAR request yet, as I'm waiting to see if the SLC contacts me again. Credit rating is not an issue for me at present, but I feel that I should at least do something about this; they are unlikely to forget about the debt, and as far as I'm concerned I have done nothing wrong and can prove that I earn below the repayment threshold.

 

many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

so sorry Suti for not getting back to you earlier

 

My Student loans have been statute barred - it means they cant take legal action against you - what so ever! - so they cant inforce the debt

i see you have been in touch with them in the few last years or so well i had heard nothing from them for over ten years and last August they contacted me thats when i did some research - really do your research it is helpful - as you have been paying there isnt much you can do - as i understand it they can contact other people that are related - not very ethical i agree but thats the way it is

if you need anything else contact me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Duty4You,

Firstly thanks for your contributions to the thread.

 

I have been living abroad since 2002 and transferred away from a British contract in 2004. I have not contacted the SLC at all since then, but my parents have received an annual statement.

 

Does the statute barred apply to one or two way communication? ie Can I also apply for this in 2010 after 6 years of no contact with myself.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi there

ok they can contact known addresses - so it may mean parents etc may be contacted - ok - but they have to be in contact with you - ie letter - phone - telegram - makes nooo difference -they need to be in contact with you!

It is their job to chase you - ask your parents to file under IGNORE - it does not impact on there credit at all if it does SUE them - it is your debt - so its up to you what you do - i have my loans barred - it does not mean its gone just that they can not take action against me - so the debt is dormant - as for the DCA - they broke the law and i am taking them to court for that fact -

you live abroad enjoy!!

forget it - remember six years no contact makes no difference they need to show they have been in contact with you

ok

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yes your right kurvaface pre 1998 are simple cca covered by the 1974 act - post 1998 are wages linked - but can still be barred if no contact or work related employment has been undertaken - but now the SLC can apply to have it show on your credit file - at the moment its a grey area - as i said mine are statute barred so i am activily looking to see any action on that level- as a side line i have had 4 phone calls this week from SLC after it was SB and had apoligies each time and confirmation of the status of this debt - so my next step it sue them for violation of act 8 and 9 of the human rights act and criminal harrassment hang on and i will up date you when i get more info

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...