Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest wont transfer Debit Orders


MissQtoe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5759 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have found this site extremely helpful in the past and wondered if someone could advise me?

 

After long standing problems with Natwest I decided to move all accounts to another bank. This will be in 3 phases:

Phase 1: Move main account and all debit orders away from Natwest (now)

Phase 2: Move Natwest mortgage (Oct 2009)

Phase 3: Move Natwest Loan (2012)

 

The issue I have with Natwest stems from an internal association with my (now liquidated) ex husband. (We have been divorced for 4 years). My credit records are fantastic outside of Natwest and I can easily obtain credit with other lenders, however with the internal negative association, Natwest treats me like a pikey.:shock:

 

Anyway, new bank is in the process of transfering all my direct debits from Natwest, however Natwet refuses to transfer the direct debits set up for my Natwest mortgage and Natwest loan accounts to new bank. Natwest insists I have to keep my Natwest account open to service these transactions (this is an advantage premierre account costing me £ 12 per month). Natwest also indicated they are unwilling to transfer my mortgage at all due to wording on our divorce court order. Can I do anything?

 

(I am signed up with my mortgage until Oct 2009 with Natwest at favourable terms, plus my Natwest loan is also on favourable terms taken out before the credit crunch - so I am reluctant to transfer these accounts and incur penalites plus higher interest.)

 

Your thoughts will be greatly appreciated!

The Mozzie vs. Loans.co.uk / MBNA / Bank of America

in

Horsham County Court - Jan 2008

for:

Breach of Data Protection Act 1998 and Money Laundering Regulations 2003 - dont ask me I am still studying these up!

:D

 

Please PM any help, tipz or relevant case studies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris,

 

Thank you for your reply. No, ex does not work for Natwest. He was a business client of theirs until he liquidated - he ended up owing Natwest around £250K, with CCJ's etc. The liquidation occurre post divorce. Effectively he is blacklisted within Natwest.

 

My divorce order is for the Natwest mortgage to remain in joint names but I am liable to pay the mortgage and the house was transferred into my sole name (i.e. I have a negative association within Natwest bank because I cant kick the ex off our mortgage). This negative association had been removed by Equifax et al from my credit files so my credit scoring is very good with other lenders.

The Mozzie vs. Loans.co.uk / MBNA / Bank of America

in

Horsham County Court - Jan 2008

for:

Breach of Data Protection Act 1998 and Money Laundering Regulations 2003 - dont ask me I am still studying these up!

:D

 

Please PM any help, tipz or relevant case studies

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have an advantage gold account cos the private account would be more per month.

 

Not sure what more I can advise.....for now.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have to be very careful we don't throw the baby out with the bath water by moving everything to another provider which may in the long run be more costly.

 

When you say they treat you like a pikey is that merely your conception or can you give any details of incidents you can refer to support your allegations. If so you might be able to establish grounds for a compliant to the regulator

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris,

 

I have £ 200K equity in house, and earn £ 60K p.a. I recently requested an overdraft from Natwest (£ 500 for just 15 days) for laser eye surgery during my holidays. I made it clear to Natwest that I expect a £ 6K bonus by end July, so the amount is well covered. It would just have been convenient to have the surgery done during my holiday, which was last 2 weeks in July, rather than during work time. Natwest refused. I negotiated with my Natwest personal banker, and he referred to HO. HO refused citing negative association.

 

I immediately walked accross to a random high street bank (now the 'new bank') and they arranged a new account with an £1K overdraft within 48 hours. I asked myself this: If I was mugged in Soweto and rung Natwest for an emergency advance to get me back home, what could I expect from them?

 

(and also, I bought a new BMW 6 months ago through BMW Finance, after Natwest refused to finance a vehicle. No problems with BMW Finance, my finance was approved within seconds.)

 

I have been with Natwest for 8 years, and I could remain there for the rest of my life but I dont see any reason why I should be held responsible for the wrongdoing of one of their other cleints.

The Mozzie vs. Loans.co.uk / MBNA / Bank of America

in

Horsham County Court - Jan 2008

for:

Breach of Data Protection Act 1998 and Money Laundering Regulations 2003 - dont ask me I am still studying these up!

:D

 

Please PM any help, tipz or relevant case studies

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there any accounts linked to your ex other half? Were there prior to him being made bankrupt? Were you ever connected to the company of ex OH?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only account linked to the ex is our joint Natwest mortgage account which has been in place for 8 years. We divorced 4 years ago, he bankrupted 3 years ago, and I have never been connected to any of his businesses or other accounts.

The Mozzie vs. Loans.co.uk / MBNA / Bank of America

in

Horsham County Court - Jan 2008

for:

Breach of Data Protection Act 1998 and Money Laundering Regulations 2003 - dont ask me I am still studying these up!

:D

 

Please PM any help, tipz or relevant case studies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I have been wrestling with what little conscience I have got left when on bank charges forums for the last couple of days and I think it is time to suggest something on the loan and mortgage issue BUT it is HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL AND UNTESTED.

 

Set up a Standing order with Account number and sort code of the loan. In the Narrative put in "PR" that stands for "Part Repayment".

THIS IS AN UNTESTED METHOD so try a tester of say £1 for example.

 

The mortgage is slightly different. There is an account number and sort code used for mortgages ie lump sum reductions. Set up a Standing order with the mortgage account as the Reference.

 

BOTH METHODS ARE TOTALLY UNTESTED but may sort out the problem.

 

I have put the above in bold because I don't know if it will work but I suspect the first one with regards to the loan will work and the second one MAY work.

Please be aware that this is experimental and I would not suggest cancelling anything until you are certain it works.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...