Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Andy111
      General question about CCJ's if not enforced or extended after 6 years

      By Andy111 · Posted

      Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • dx100uk
      Moneybarn - Termination Received, no default received and only missed 3 payments.

      By dx100uk · Posted

      whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • dx100uk
      Caught shoplifting Sainsbury's but they also detained and kept M&S stolen goods

      By dx100uk · Posted

      std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • honeybee13
      Caught shoplifting Sainsbury's but they also detained and kept M&S stolen goods

      By honeybee13 · Posted

      Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • honeybee13
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By honeybee13 · Posted

      Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

[edited] Phone Menu

Bookworm
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yourbank

yourbank

Posted
Posted

These are the definitions I have found

 

  1. someone who spends a great deal of time reading
  2. a person who pays more attention to formal rules and book learning than they merit
  3. Any larva of a beetle or moth, which is injurious to books. Many species are known.

With 18000+ posts I assumed it was 1. rather than 3.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

bigbutcute

bigbutcute

Posted
Posted
Yep, Bookie has been trolling about 18,618 times.

 

Desperate desperation.

 

Don't mind me.... just need a quick nap......

 

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

Ok you have a nice sleep.

 

 

Rock-a-bye baby, in the tree top

When the wind blows, the cradle will rock

When the bough breaks, the cradle will fall

And down will come baby, cradle and all

 

There you go even a lullaby for you

Link to post
Share on other sites
Janet-M

Janet-M

Posted
Posted
At last,took you long enough;)

not as long as some people it seems :rolleyes:

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thailand

Thailand

Posted
Posted
Ok you have a nice sleep.

 

 

Rock-a-bye baby, in the tree top

When the wind blows, the cradle will rock

When the bough breaks, the cradle will fall

And down will come baby, cradle and all

 

There you go even a lullaby for you

 

Has your situation become that needy....bless. :)

 

To be clear, I was laughing my ass off @ how pathetic your posts have obviously needed to become.

 

Do carry on though...otherwise it may be constreud as your being incorrect is directly affecting your knowing you should shut up. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Janet-M

Janet-M

Posted
Posted
so much for freedom of speech.

I agree what you say over freedom of speech BBC ,it is a great thing :D

people are free to say what they like, but freedom of speech also means people will call you a w****r if someone behave like one ... it goes both ways ;)

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
yourbank

yourbank

Posted
Posted

Thailand, I don't want to go anywhere near where this thread is going, what people have or have not done. We are moving to ground in which I said I would not go when I returned to CAG. When a thread starts going there, we miss the fact that others need advice and help. This thread is merely a sideshow/destraction from that.......and I see we have 2 "invisible" moderators watching the thread so I am sure they will decide what they want to do with the thread and action it. Good night to this thread and see you on Monday when it might be worth a calm read.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbutcute

bigbutcute

Posted
Posted
Has your situation become that needy....bless. :)

 

To be clear, I was laughing my ass off @ how pathetic your posts have obviously needed to become.

 

Do carry on though...otherwise it may be constreud as your being incorrect is directly affecting your knowing you should shut up. :)

 

No need to be personal is there :Cry:.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thailand

Thailand

Posted
Posted
Didn't my lullaby work for you Thai my old mate

 

:eek:

 

What would my actual friends think of me if I befriended a fool like you! By the way, your child song was loverly.

 

This will, of course, go on all day...until YOU realise what a plonker you truely are.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thailand

Thailand

Posted
Posted
Thailand, I don't want to go anywhere near where this thread is going, what people have or have not done. We are moving to ground in which I said I would not go when I returned to CAG. When a thread starts going there, we miss the fact that others need advice and help. This thread is merely a sideshow/destraction from that.......and I see we have 2 "invisible" moderators watching the thread so I am sure they will decide what they want to do with the thread and action it. Good night to this thread and see you on Monday when it might be worth a calm read.

 

LOL - you had typed what I was thinking! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbutcute

bigbutcute

Posted
Posted
I agree what you say over freedom of speech BBC ,it is a great thing :D

people are free to say what they like, but freedom of speech also means people will call you a w****r if someone behave like one ... it goes both ways ;)

 

I agree with you, but as the terms state no abuse or naughty language.

 

Well that's enough for me now, it's obvious that a few find the need to jump on my back, so really there is no point carrying on..

 

Site Team please remember this thread and the way that my posts old and new have been removed just because some one didn't like what i posted

 

BYE BYE

Link to post
Share on other sites
Janet-M

Janet-M

Posted
Posted
I agree with you, but as the terms state no abuse or naughty language.And no abuse or naught language was used .I just agreed with you and then stated a fact

 

Well that's enough for me now, it's obvious that a few find the need to jump on my back, so really there is no point carrying on..I think you have jumped on everything and anything that you could of possibly found.People have just used their free speech to respond , remember free speech that you was talking about before ?

 

Site Team please remember this thread and the way that my posts old and new have been removed just because some one didn't like what i posted

I am guessing that the site team have responded to the items that you yourself brought up , and I should imagine that they correctly started with your posts .How would it look if they reacted to your complaints and edited other people without them also editing you .. as you so rightly say ,same rules for everyone

 

BYE BYE

ooh I see you DID finally realise ;)

 

At last,took you long enough;)

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
locutus

locutus

Posted
Posted

we should settle this the old fashioned way (Mud wrestling, 1st one naked loses)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbutcute

bigbutcute

Posted
Posted
can I have my proper name back? ... shyte bag was surly only offensive to people with bowel problems :cool: and I feel the name suits me when I am in the mood :D

 

I can't see nothing wrong with name :confused:

 

You altered the original meaning not to cause offence, such as the word feck, that is used without problems..;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thailand

Thailand

Posted
Posted

How surprising that you don't find it offensive. :rolleyes:

 

It clearly is just plain rude (wouldn't bother me, but it likely would others).

 

In any case, BigbutIwillfindatechnicalitytoattempttogetsomethingright, you are still not convincing anyone you have a point.

 

Back to an earlier post of yours, about some words not being moderated, do you think there are enough site team who give up thier free time to read every post? Please stop trying to pick holes. If you keep digging, you aint going to unearth a stepladder.

Link to post
Share on other sites
stikky62

stikky62

Posted
Posted
so really there is no point carrying on..

BYE BYE

 

Make ya mind up.

You staying or going?

 

If you are indecisive,, press 1,,,or 2,,, maybe 3......perhaps 4...or come back later and try again? :p

Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbutcute

bigbutcute

Posted
Posted

 

In any case, BigbutIwillfindatechnicalitytoattempttogetsomethingright, you are still not convincing anyone you have a point.

 

Ok ThaicurrywillLandinmyLapcozi'mmoreconcernedfindingfaultsinBigButCutethanIamat eatingit.

 

As for your remark of site team not having time to check every post,they seem to have found the time to go through mine.

Site Team please explain, i know it wouldn't be coz i made an opinion which others differ with,as site team would remain neutral.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Michael Browne

Michael Browne

Posted
Posted
I will just wait for the Answer from Site Team now thanks, as the terms and conditions clearly reminds members about things such as Language etc etc, so being modded as you put it should not apply to one and not to others,included going through a members post history.;)

Hopefully they'll have more sense,and of course if that doesn't suit you, you could take your own advice:

BYE BYE

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...