Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Three in a bed Argos, Next and Moorcroft Advice/opinion on letter to Moorcroft


blind-as-a-bat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok im trying to come up with a reply to Moorcroft this is what ive got so far, most of it is from template letters from posters so credit and thanks too them, but im not sure on my interpretation of Section 175 CCA 1974:

 

Am i anywhere near or have i got that bit all wrong? any input greatfully recieved

 

 

Ps if im to believe the litigation threat then this should have already been sent so no pressure:eek:

 

 

Dear Sir/Madame

 

I am writing in reference to TWO alleged debts you claim to acting as agents for.

 

The first is alleged to be with Argos Ref: - xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

A request for a CCA for this was sent to you on the xxth April 2008 by recorded delivery, for which I have proof of delivery signed for on the xxth April 2008, which equates to xx days at the time of writing.

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before you enter into a default situation.

 

If that request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days you commit a summary criminal offence.

 

These limits have expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

And

 

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

However the contents of your correspondence dated xxnd xxx 2008 ( see copy A enclosed) are noted but I regret to inform you that as you are claiming to be acting as agent for Argos the following section of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 applies

 

Section 175 CCA 1974:

 

"175. Duty of persons deemed to be agents.

Where under this Act a person is deemed to receive a notice or payment as agent of the creditor or owner under a regulated agreement, he shall be deemed to be under a contractual duty to the creditor or owner to transmit the notice, or remit the payment, to him forthwith."

 

I could speculate as to the reason as to why you returned my request for a CCA to myself instead of forwarding to you clients as you should as stated above, but regardless of your motive it does not discharge you nor your client of your duty to supply a valid CCA as requested.

 

You and your client have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

Please also be aware it is your responsibility to inform your client of the above, as stated in Section 175 CCA 1974

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

Regarding the second alleged debt from Next Directory Ltd Ref: - xxxxxxxx Your Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the Next Directory Ltdand has been since xxth xxx 2008.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

My last letter from Next Directory Ltdwas dated the xxth xxxx 2008 with what they claimed to be there compliance with my CCA request, which contained a blank illegible agreement and a covering letter ( see copy B and copy C enclosed) needless to say it does not, and as I am aware Next Directory Ltd have tried to pursue legal action on the strength of this and failed on several occasions Next Directory Ltd are fully aware it does not also.

As Next Directory Ltd is now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the Next Directory Ltd for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as Moorcroft Debt Recovery Ltd cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

If Moorcroft Debt Recovery Ltd chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

Edited by blind-as-a-bat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there baab,

 

Personally I think you would be better off sending a seperate letter for each account and also starting a thread for each account. These things can soon get quite messy with more than one account per thread.

 

Have you actually sent a reply to them yet?

 

Perhaps you should scan up the letters you have received from Morecrap so people can help out more.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i sent a CCA to moorcroft as argos had already passed it on and got this reply eventually, not had anything since

 

http://www.blind-as-a-bat.eu/moorcroft1edited.JPG

 

 

Regarding the next i sent a CCA to next who replired with these

 

http://www.blind-as-a-bat.eu/next1edited.jpg

 

http://www.blind-as-a-bat.eu/next2noeditneeded.jpg

 

then eventually passed it to moorcroft who sent me this

 

http://www.blind-as-a-bat.eu/edited-Copy-next-moor.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I wouldn`t worry about the Argos / Moorcroft account just yet, they haven`t complied with your request, so it is still in play. Untill they deliver CCA, there`s very little they can do.

 

How old is this Argos Account, I`m onto my 3rd DCA (Including Morcrap) and been through a Solicitors. What is the balance?

 

Did Next actually send you a blank CCA? If so, they`re going to need a lot more than that.

 

How old is this account and what is the balance?

 

When did you receive the Pre-Court Letter from Morecrap?

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recieved the Moorcroft letter Re Next friday afternoon,

 

All aledged accounts are quite a few years old well before the 2006 changes. but untill they supply the agreemants i cant give you exact dates :-?:rolleyes:

 

The next account is just short of £800

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Yeah my letters always tend to have the desired effect ;)

 

Sorry Curlyben looks like your letter has lost,s affectivnes

 

recieved this in the post today:rolleyes:

 

Moornext%2022-07-08editedsm.jpg

 

Question are the amounts they quote based on the value of the alledged debts as i got one of these for the argos account and they where a lot more than this one:confused: Makes no differance just curious:p

 

Whats the best reply to them egnoring the account is in despute letter?

 

Ive tried doing a couple but dardnt send them (well i dare but may not be wise:p) Or is this not even worth a reply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to worry.

You have nothing further to say to them anyway.

It now time to report these "people" to Trading Standards as they are clearly demanding payment on an unsubstantiated debt.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

And which 'major public utility' has breached the Data Protection Act?

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean as in the OC for passing the details to Moorcroft?

 

 

No - in the letter in post 9 above it say 'Please note that we have confirmed with a major public utility that you are in occupancy at the above address'.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes never read that bit, i got as far as "Notice of" before i got bored:p

 

Normally they put we have added £12 for sending you this pointless letter there:rolleyes:

 

What do you reckon the chances are of me finding out which utility they imagined, er sorry i mean did contact:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dont worry to much about the letter - if you read it is says it MAY which is very careful worded threat. It doesnt say it will!!!! Again I would call the company say you have written letters which they have not responded to, you suggest they read the letter before sending out any scary letters! I would then put the phone down leaving the DCA to look into your account. If you get any more letters etc ignoring yours then speak to a solictor or CAB office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there blind-as-a-bat,

 

Have you noticed they say if Legal action is nescessary then the debt will increase? They seem to think they will automatically get judgement if they issue a claim.

 

Clearly this is just a pointless last minute threat to try and scare you into giving in.

 

Let them get on with it and waste their time and money. Without a valid CCA they won`t get very far. Then you can counterclaim for harrassment and demand a public apology and explanation for their very existence, when all they do in life is send irritating letters to people for debts they haven`t proved.

 

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What do you reckon the chances are of me finding out which utility they imagined, er sorry i mean did contact:grin:

 

Hang on a mo - I can see Lord Lucan riding past on Shergar. I'll see if he knows ...

 

 

... damn, he went past without stopping. Sorry.

 

Ooh, hang on another mo. There's a canoe out there...

 

 

... blast. Not doing so well here - there's no-one in it.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dont worry to much about the letter - if you read it is says it MAY which is very careful worded threat. It doesnt say it will!!!! Again I would call the company say you have written letters which they have not responded to, you suggest they read the letter before sending out any scary letters! I would then put the phone down leaving the DCA to look into your account. If you get any more letters etc ignoring yours then speak to a solictor or CAB office.

 

You will notice that the OP says both accounts are in dispute, this means the DCA must CEASE all collection activity until the dispute is resolved.

Therefore he does not need to go to a solicitor or the CAB, he just needs to wait until the DCA has resolved the disputes.

Do you agree??

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if there was ever any doubt that it was just an empty threat (which there wasnt:p) then Moorcroft have made themselves look daft again.

 

Recieved a "we confirm Next cant supply an agreemant" letter after that one arived

 

Does waffle on about account outstanding, goods supplied, Then ask me to confirm goods where supplied (yeh right as if, isnt that theres and Next,s job to prove there where?)

And how i propose to settle the bill (IF they can prove goods where supplied...... slowly......... if at all:rolleyes::p).

 

They obviously are judging my inteligence by there own standards:p

 

My guess is i now need to remind them of the Data Protection act they are in breach of by proscessing any information as they cant prove permision was given in a contract to do so? Am i correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi blind-as-a-bat,

 

I received one of those from them regarding an Argos Account, then I never heard from them again.

 

I was later hassled from Fredrikson International, who did show up with a dodgy looking Agreement, but were later scattered. I am at presently being pestered by JBDR, who I like to call BJ :p

 

You should have nothing more to fear from Morecrap.

 

Regards

 

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can send them a notice to cease processing your data, as they do not have your permission to do so, send it to the OC as well though

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...