Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice please Rockwell/Tessera


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5773 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I received a letter from Rockwell DCA in Feb 2008 regarding a Credit card debt to which I promptly sent a Statute barred letter.

I then heard nothing.

 

Yesterday arrived (5 months later) 16 sheets of A4 paper with no headings or titles etc, 1st of which has a reference ,my name and address clients name (Tessera) amount owed, amount paid (£0) and nothing else.

 

The following sheets were again something my 5 year old daughter could have printed (just being sheets of white paper) but each page was a monthly statement of the credit card showing Balance brought forward, Cash interest, purchase interest and any charges added dated from Sep 2001 to Dec 2002

These sheets also clearly show that the balance stopped increasing and charges not applied from 3 May 2002 with the same balance showing through until Dec 2002.

 

Also enclosed is a complement slip from Rockwell stating:

 

Please find enclosed copy documentation in response to your recent query.

 

Copy statements enclosed

 

If we do not hear from you within the next 10 working days, further recovery action will continue

Do these people have a case or are they trying it on?

Any advice anyone could give would be much appreciated as I do not know what to do now.

 

Best Regards

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they're trying it on. Send the statute barred letter again, and mention that if they carry on demading payment for a statute barred debt, then you'll report them to the OFT.

 

It's not unusual for the bottomfeeder type DCA's to try and get you to pay something or admit to a statute barred debt, so it starts the clock ticking for another 6 years. Admit nothing, pay them nothing, and eventually they'll go away. They buy the debt for pennies in the pound, and if they can get 1 in 50 to pay up, they make a huge profit.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for that, as far as I can remember I have never spoken to these people, let alone acknowledged the debt in writing!

 

Is there any sort of standard 'Bog off' letter available anywhere? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have already told them it is SB then throw this at them:

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

Dear sir/madam,

 

Thank you for your letter of the DATE, the contents of which have been noted.

 

I refer you to my letter of DATE, in which my position was clearly described. To reiterate, you were informed that this alleged debt is Barred under Statute in accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. I have included a copy of this original correspondence for your perusal and ease of reference.

 

 

As your letter contests that this is the case, it is now your legal obligation to substantiate your claims and to prove that this alleged debt is indeed enforceable and not barred by statute.

 

You should be aware that I am fully familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance, which states that it is unfair to mislead debtors as to their rights and obligations by falsely stating or implying that the debt is still legally recoverable and continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred.

 

 

You should also be aware that if you are unable to substantiate your claims then your behaviour will be considered harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and may result in my choosing to pursue action against you.

As was stated in my last letter, any attempt to contact me by telephone regarding an alleged debt is an offence under section 127 of the Telecommunications Act 2003.

 

 

In addition, I hereby demand that you now supply me with information regarding your complaints procedure. Failure to comply will result in the complaint being escalated to the Financial Ombudsman Service, who will charge you for investigating my complaint.

 

Finally, I expect no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide clear evidence as to my liability for the debt in question, or your written confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully,

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I have been trying to sort out a debt with Rockwell since November last year. I have sent CCA's to them and received nothing. In May (4 months after requesting it) they wrote to me saying HSBC bank have been unable to provide them with a copy of the original application and therefore they will not pursue this account any longer!! Great I thought...yesterday I received a letter from them accepting my one off offer to clear the account (this offer was made in Dec last year).

Can they now ask for payment after sending a letter saying they will not pursue the account??

This company are so confusing - any advice welcomed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I have been trying to sort out a debt with Rockwell since November last year. I have sent CCA's to them and received nothing. In May (4 months after requesting it) they wrote to me saying HSBC bank have been unable to provide them with a copy of the original application and therefore they will not pursue this account any longer!! Great I thought...yesterday I received a letter from them accepting my one off offer to clear the account (this offer was made in Dec last year).

Can they now ask for payment after sending a letter saying they will not pursue the account??

This company are so confusing - any advice welcomed.

They can ask but you can say NO!!

 

Had they been able to produce a valid CCA you can rest assured that they would not have accepted your offer. They are up the proverbial creek without a paddle as they cannot enforse the debt without a valid CCA. They should have accepted your offer in December.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore it, they will come back at you with a load of threat-o-matics, but if they have no CCA then there is nothing they can do.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ODC that's what I thought :D. Should I respond or just ignore the letter?

 

Just ignore it, they will come back at you with a load of threat-o-matics, but if they have no CCA then there is nothing they can do.

 

Ignore their begging letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

UPDATE TIME !

 

They sent me a copy of my original credit agreement dated 1999

and nothing else!? Does this mean anything?

 

Any advice would be very much apprieciated

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi sipea, nice to hear from you again

so they sent you your agreement dated 1999, big deal, still statute barred.

 

if i were you send a letter to them (complaints department)

 

thank them for sending the agreement but they have not acknowledged my complaint. the account is statute barred and you require a full response to this matter. mention the addmin of justice act.

 

the dca are just trying it on, agreement means didly squat

 

inform them the account is still in dispute untill they address my complaint

 

send recorded delievery

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OMG!! This company are driving me up the wall. They sent me a letter in July chasing a debt that they had told me they had no CCA for (see osts on 13th July). I ignored their letter and today received 3 letters from them all dated 19th Aug. 2 are identical and thank me for my recent correspondance (I haven't sent any) and say if I send payment of X amount within 14 days they will accept it as full and final payment. The other letter is threatening court action, bailiffs etc. Shall I send them a copy of the letter they sent months ago saying they would not pursue this debt? Surely this is harrasment? Any advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...