Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EXPERIAN... The final battle commences


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

good...its a petition.... meant to be ;)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 862
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi finlander you mentioned six years but DCA are chasing old debts as old as 10 years. Do Banks and other lending institutions keeps old agreement older than six years and if so what reason would they do that because it must take up storage space and money.

 

Are they allowed by law to keep old paper work over six years if it is not applicable for them to do so.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely 10 years is statute barred?.... check with a mod but I'm pretty sure that they can't go after you for that and certainly can't register it:eek:

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

The head of a rather large DCA once told me " Statute Barred means the debt cannot be enforced through the courts - if a debt is owed then anyone is entitled to ask you to repay it, just because it cannot be enforced through the court does not mean we cannot 'ask' for it " ( some nicer than others)

 

So that's why they do it - they ask...some might feel a moral obligation because they knew they had the money and actually repay it to the dca. Can't blame them for trying I guess, but members of this happy site know the remedy though. The profits gained by these people on just a few people agreeing to repay is enough to keep them in wine and a good living.

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Sarah, but as we on here know, once the DCA or whoever is chasing has been informed that a debt is stat barred and that the account will not be paid, it's against OFT guidlines to request payment ;) It's probably against CPUTR 2008 as well but I've not looked into that yet...Oops :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Six years does that mean that banks and dca can retain documents that is over 10 years old and if so what is the purpose of it. Is it for DCA to harassment people for money that they have no legal right to do so. If they have the correct paperwork then why not send it out at the beginning before they start to send out are begging letter and then threats to take court action, telling lies as if they could take court action they would do swiftly as they would have a legal right to do so. 'No' DCA's would rather harass people with they continuing games and constant phoning people these people should be stopped and soon before more people commit suicide.:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALLWOOD,

 

You could always ask them for the £10000 you think they might owe you but you can't remember why exactly. It's just as much legally unenforcable, unprovable etc but they think it's ok so why can't you. In fact lets make it a nice round £1000000. while they are scratching their heads trying to figure out what your on about tell them to get lost ......;)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously tho allwood... these peole rely on the oxygen of verbal communication. It gives them a chance to brow beat you and act big. If they call answer the phone and as soon as it is apparent its a DCA just put it down.

keep the letters they send as future evidence but ignore any threats as the useless flatulance they are. Keep an eye on your credit file just in case they try it on with a default. but don't let them get you down. Its all hot air and rubbish.

 

AND DONT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT.

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't want to distract your thread Finlander, but this article's worth taking a look:

Post 1173 CAG CRA SAR...

Information's 'big money' Allwood - makes my blood boil!:mad:

BUT things must change.

No more suicides caused by unscrupulous DCAs, fuelled by... ??:mad::mad:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOSUMI,

 

I agree they do have power and unfortunately access to all the info they need. And thats great for them and the labour party. For all care they can sit in the office and have information fights by throwing pieces of paper at each other all day. However the moment they publish it that becomes a different matter........ Its the law then.. and the defamation act is powerful....... I think we need the OFT involved as well... I have started a thread here..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-attn-moderator-please.html

 

go and have a look and put your comments down to see if we can get CAG to officially back this and sticky it on the front page....

 

We can stop this if we just stand together and get on with it.......;)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now if Experian had just removed these defaults... I would have gone away.. but Millsy (good old Millsy) has p*ss*d me off a bit so Im in it for the longterm now.........:p

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now if Experian had just removed these defaults... I would have gone away.. but Millsy (good old Millsy) has p*ss*d me off a bit so Im in it for the longterm now.........:p

 

your not the only one. will stand with you all the way on this one.

 

had enough of getting refused for things i messed up in the past. i couldn't helped it getting laid off i didn't ask for it. not 2 days before xmas.

 

i agree why don't CAG help us by putting up a sticky, whos it going to hurt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALLWOOD,

 

You could always ask them for the £10000 you think they might owe you but you can't remember why exactly. It's just as much legally unenforcable, unprovable etc but they think it's ok so why can't you. In fact lets make it a nice round £1000000. while they are scratching their heads trying to figure out what your on about tell them to get lost ......;)

 

your post made me laugh finlander, I might just send some thing like you said to the DCA's that have been trying to extract money from me without any authority whatsoever. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing......with interest, will read it thoroughly

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im off folks...work finished home time... will be back tomorrow for some updates... who knows perhaps Millsy(good ole Millsy) will have written to me by then and we can move onto the next stage in the plan......

 

sweet dreams.......;)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is part of my next letter to all CRA's this is something that I believe will cause them to spit their morning coffe buns all over the office.

sparkie

 

I also do not and will not accept the statement made by CRA’s that they cannot remove any data without the consent of the supplier and will make strong representations to this fact in any court proceedings should they be necessary. Which again I state I will take if also necessary.

If this was true then a CRA could not remove/suppress any data from any individuals credit file as you say you will do if you receive no confirmation from any supplier (verification) to support the data they have supplied.

Even if you do not receive that confirmation according to the statement “you cannot remove it without their specific consent.” You cannot remove it ......(or soyou say) because they have not given you the consent required for you to remove it.

 

If you can and do remove it this confirms that fact that all CRA’s can remove data without the consent of the supplier at any time they desire.

 

 

Therefore the statement that is made contrary to this ............is a misrepresentative statement under the Misrepresentation Act 1967., under which a statement is either.... true or false ....there are no such things as half truths .

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who hasn't seen this thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

 

please have a look and see if you can give any ideas....;)

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Finlander.

 

Callcredit have removed the barclays default notice from my credit file. now to go and get them on the cabot one for the same debt. and the hillesden one that has been removed by hillesden.

as Hillesden dont own the debt they can't mark the credit file if im right on this. it has to be the original creditor correct. got them, on this one to. barclays have closed the account and accepted to not chase the debt. due to bank charges that amount to the same amount.

 

the debt was never sold. Hillesden only had the notice off assignment. but that was a fake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm subscribing to this thread with great interest, as upon checking my credit file again today (last checked in march) Orange have logged it as updated in June, but the balance they are reporting is incorrect. i have evidence of all the standing orders made to them each month, and the balance they recorded doesn't reflect these payments!! :mad:

 

1) Anyone challenged a phone company & got them to update your file/remove a marker of your account being in default?

 

2) Are mobile phone companies even regulated by the CCA?

3) If not, can they record info on your creditworthiness?

4) What happens if they terminate the agreement? Do they terminate my permission to share data with 3rd parties at the same time?

 

Sorry to hijack Finlander.... am really backing you on this one :)

Edited by zosaphine
edited due to my rubbish spelling!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to start your own thread if you haven't already. however, I managed to get Vodafone to remove a default with one letter. It depends how much the default is for. I basically sent them a very polite letter explaining it was a simple mistake and that default for such a small amount would have a HUGE affect on my credit worthiness and would they please consider removing it. 7 days later it was gone as a "good will guesture".

 

I believe Mobile companies are NOT regualted by CCA1974. Yes then can record info with the CRAs because you gave them permission when you signed your contract. On point 4, it appears to be a complex area but ICO's take on it seems to be that consent is only one aspect of sharing data with the CRAs. I don't believe trying to withdraw your consent would be effective but I suppose nothing ventured, nothing gained.

 

It should be noted that mobile companies are notoriously difficult to deal with. I would HIGHLY recommend trying the softly softly touch first ("pretty please remove the default Mr Orange, it was a big mistake on my part, I'm very sorry"). If you go straight in with the heavy handed approach (CCA, DPA etc) they'll probably just tell you to go away and you've already burned your bridge.

 

Hope this helps. If you need more help, send me a link to your thread when you've created it.

[COLOR=blue][B]Defaultless since 2012 :)[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=green][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well.... Im feeling quite unloved now...Millsy (good ole Millsy) hasn't written back yet........:(... bored... waiting is dull.....who can I annoy as I wait..... I know...... AA Car loans... we are about to pay ours off and I'm sure they charged us a late payment fee once....... will take it out on them :p

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...