Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help needed court hearing w/ natwest


111honey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5803 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi to all,

would like to get some advice ,already posted this but with my ppi thread.

 

sorry for this long history of my NatWest problem.

 

i took a 25k loan in NatWest in 2005 in my name , went into dmp nov last year, acquired 2k o/d in our joint a/c as NatWest use this to pay my loan.shhotsmith on behalf of NatWest applied for ccj and added my loan and o/d ,court ask me to pay NatWest 26,110k or 55o/month otherwise CO in my property. i Apply for re determination and i am due for a hearing on june24. i continue to make a small payment since my dmp started and as i previously offered amount that i could really afford

 

now there is anoter DCA called intrum justicia who are pestering/yhreatening home visit then court to my husband ask him to pay our 2k o/d where in fact this amount is already a court case but in my name.is there anything i can do with this?:confused:

 

any help and advice on what defence i could present to court ,i already fill in my expenditure/priority debt as well as the small payment made to other creditor which they alredy accept..

 

i dont have equity in my house and as i read this site somebody said that it is also unfair for other creditor to put a co in a property.

 

i am getting more anxious everyday thinking about my hearing is coming near, i should also cca NatWest first before this ccj since i took this loan to pay the old with large ppi.:-x

 

thank you all ,any advice is very much appreciated.:)

Edited by 111honey
mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

another thing as far as i remember i just telphone natwest to add my husbands name in my account and make it a joint account.

can he cca/sar natwest.is it possible that if there is no sign agreement of him in this bank account can he dispute this acct. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

although did not get a reply from this post i just hope someone could give me an advice ,i've been to court today for my application for re determination give my defence I&E and list of creditor on arrangement in place,explained to judge that i could only afford t pay 103/mon as part of my available funds distributed to each creditors, i also emphasize that whilst NatWest is not accepting my payment offer i still continue to pay even prior&after CCJ and perhaps at higher rate in future, also its unfair to put a CO whilst other creditors is accepted my offer without any unnecessary condition.

 

shoosmith rep acting on behalf of natwesr emphasize that the amount i am paying does not even cover the interest of 170/mon in this ccj and will increase my debt more, anyway the judge said it will take me 20 years to pay therfore forthwith payment granted. i said i could only afford what my offer is ,he said i just continue to pay the amount i could afford but NatWest has the right to apply for CO in my property.after the hearing the shootsmith rep told me that if they apply for co it does not mean that they wiil force me to sell the house ,told him that they can not get money eventhough i sell my house because of negative equity, he said if co granted it will be better for me coz i could request to freeze int and it will save me money .

 

is that true? any idea what will happen next? iam thinking of going bunkrupt(total debt over 80thou) but my heart is breaking when my 9 year old daugther crying thinking that we will lose our house.

thanks for any advice

Edited by 111honey
mistake in spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The interest should have been frozen once the CCJ was obtained, unless of course there was a clause in the original agreement to apply post judgment interest.

 

I suggest you make a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and a Section 77 CCA request.

 

Paul

Edited by paulwlton

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thank you for your reply,just want to ask why would i need to send S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)?cca?and where will i send it ? to shootsmits or NatWest?

 

Looking at your total debt (80k) it may be better for you to enter into an IVA, although i believe there is a minimum monthly amount required.

 

The CCA request would reveal whether the bank has the authority to apply interest post judgment. The S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) will reveal what interest is being applied and when.

 

PW

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...