Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ccj Not Paid


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5831 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You may receive a warrant of execution from the court that granted the CCJ. If this happens you really need to pay it as the court bailiffs could then become involved. If the CCJ repayments are set higher than you can afford, apply for a variation order to the issuing court. If you're on benefits the fee is waived with proof of such. It's a simple process and you can get the form from your local county court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't covered by the statute of limitations . Civil Procedure rules limit it to 6 years however.

 

RSC ORDER 46

 

Rule 2 (1) A writ of execution to enforce a judgment or order may not issue without the permission of the court in the following cases, that is to say ---

(a) where 6 years or more have elapsed since the date of the judgment or order;

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from a well earned break, so sorry for ther delay in reply...

 

In my experience, on a debt of £14000, the warrant was for about £150 which included court fees.

 

You should apply to have it varied via the court that granted the initial CCJ to an amount you can afford.

 

You can ask your local county court for the forms and there is a fee to pay unless you're on certain benefits.

 

If you need more help, give us a shout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I was also under the impression that a CCJ is not subject to the six year rule in the same way that other debts are. A creditor only needs to apply to the court for permission to persue the debt if it goes over 6 years.

 

I was advised of this by a solicitor who was acting on my behalf. On the plus side if the debt has dragged on for a while, you can still try to blag a cheaper full and final settlement and have the CCJ marked as satisfied, I did this myself and reduced a debt of around 6k to around 2k I had allowed the CCJ to get ignored and and the company started procedings to get the CCJ enforced.

 

I told them I would start to pay it of an £10 per month or settle in full lower, after a bit of haggling I got a better deal.

 

So going back to the OP, the debt is not gone after 6 years, it won't be on your credit report but they can still come and collect it if they apply to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pat-UK ,but i could not pay very much to a ffs,we have just found out we have missed it and do not know if to just let it go or start paying again,i think we might wait and do as you say if we can get it down alot.

It is an old account so i wonder if we can ask for the charges to be knocked off , that would help the total fall

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they aren't chasing you , why stir up the hornets nest ? A ccj can last forever , or until the original court documents are lost and /or illegible . What year was this ccj issued ? I had a few ccj's a long time ago, i never paid them .. never heard a word about them since . I bet i won't hear anymore about them either , surprising how bits of paper deteriorate and/or get lost over the years.

 

Mine are like 18 years old now , I imagine yours aren't quite that old .. it's a gamble I guess, it worked for me all those years ago but it's different today i guess , databases and all the info they store about you everywhere , won't be the same as it was back then.

Edited by Percival Wigglesbottom
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes as Percival says, they fall off your history after 6 years, Even thought mine is paid, I did not have it marked as settled as I was led to believe it would then re-start the 6 years, and it comes off in January 2009 anyway.

 

And no sign of a CCJ on my history is better than a ccj even if it is marked as paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a unpaid ccj that is due to drop off this december and I am hoping that they have forgotton :cool:

 

And even if they come back to try to re- enforce i have done a bit of reading around here and will certainly be able to get rid of it as they didn't comply with anything they should have ((buried head in sand at time)) but now due to cag i have plenty of amno to contest it but I won't do anything about it unless they approach me first.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...