Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS, defaults, DCA's and SAR - answers please?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3133 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

holy poop you guys are good!!

 

OK - this is what I've got so far:

 

I send them the example letter contained in your response

 

I'll give them the remainder of their 12 days to furnish the CCA before making the next move

 

Do I continue making payments to the account? Is there anything at all I can claim back from these simian mouth breathers 'cos I'm now fizzing that they've trousered over 2grand of my hard earned that they might not be entitled to? Not to mention the stress, the sleepless nights etc they've caused me by pushing up the repayments to a level that I couldn't afford without taking a second job (now working 2jobs, 7 days 60 hours a week) not to mention sometimes increasing the repayments without prior warning/discussion

Once the 12 days are up CANCEL ALL PAYMENTS to them. If they have your debit card details you may want to lose it and request a new one from your bank. If the oxygen theives continue to send their begging letters you must report them to TS and now thanks to the new Unfair Trading Regulations the OFT as well using Bankfodders excellent template letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-protection-unfair-trading/147830-complaint-oft-respect-invalid.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the 12 days are up CANCEL ALL PAYMENTS to them. If they have your debit card details you may want to lose it and request a new one from your bank. If the oxygen theives continue to send their begging letters you must report them to TS and now thanks to the new Unfair Trading Regulations the OFT as well using Bankfodders excellent template letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-protection-unfair-trading/147830-complaint-oft-respect-invalid.html

 

 

they don't have any of my banking details - I pay them over the internet using my internet banking. I'll send off the example letter from earlier down the thread, reminding them they have "x" number of days remaining. It just makes me angry that I didn't discover any of this sooner as there is less than £100quid outstanding on the account :mad:

 

As regards the expiration of the 12 days and their inability to furnish information requested - if I do refuse to carry on paying them after this date surely this will put me in default? will they enter an adverse statement supporting this on my credit record (not that it's in any great shape anyway re these people)

 

as of even date I've met every demand for increased payments and have never missed a single payment either? More importantly, is there ANYTHING I can claim? what if I was to SAR them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent off a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to RBS on the 18th. The original debt/amount owed is being dealt with by their CMS in telford, and has been since the account went default in may 2001. Do I still have to pay them my current monthly payments while waiting for a response?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a credit card or bank account with RBS?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent off a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to RBS on the 18th. The original debt/amount owed is being dealt with by their CMS in telford, and has been since the account went default in may 2001. Do I still have to pay them my current monthly payments while waiting for a response?

 

I would carry on as usual and wait for your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) info make sure that they include your "Router Account" Details either myself or Paul Walton will tell you more about later, if they do not include this in your SAR, request that they do immediately.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys - thanks for the responses

 

it is a personal loan and outstanding overdraft combined, there is no credit card involved.

 

 

The account went default in may 2001 because they (the RBS) didn't/wouldn't/couldn't send me a PPI claim form when I was made redundant in Oct2000,

claim form finally arrived in june 2001.

 

 

The debt, AFAIK, has NOT been passed to a DCA but is being dealt with by CMS telford

though I do recall some years ago a letter coming from what appeared to be a DCA

- I have this somewhere and will dig it out.

 

 

The RBS wrote to me some years ago to tell me that I could no longer use the current account that went default,

and could ONLY use it for paying in.

 

 

This recently changed, they wrote telling me that they want me to make payments into a completely different account no/sort code from now on.

 

 

Does this mean that my current account has been closed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What this means is that your personal account has been closed and it has now been replaced with "the router account" I mentioned, this is where you will find some "fiddling" going on with your account .....I'll be surprised if you don't.

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

What this means is that your personal account has been closed and it has now been replaced with "the router account" I mentioned, this is where you will find some "fiddling" going on with your account .....I'll be surprised if you don't.

 

 

sparkie

 

 

sounds ominous - what sort of "fiddling" can I expect? I've already been absolutely caned, and I mean CANED for charges (when the account went default, over 6 years ago so I don't think I can claim them back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you can try claiming for charges more than 6 years old - I've succeeded on some of mine but sorry Spas, I don't have any experience of router accounts - wait for Sparkie's input. In the meantime I would dig all the paperwork out as it sounds as though you've got some research to do! Good luck.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are still paying on the account even if it is closed you will be able and can claim all your charges back, what you have got to wait for is to see how far back they supply your bank statements to.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have one for me. You can be sure that you will get a begging letter from RWC as soon as they realise you have not paid your blood money this month. However without a properly executed valid CCA they can do sweet FA

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a quick update -

 

it's now 22 (calendar) days since RBS received my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and they haven't cashed my cheque yet (SAR sent by registered post and received but royal mail website says no electronic proof of receipt available)

 

what happens if they go over the 40 days without replying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a quick update -

 

it's now 22 (calendar) days since RBS received my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and they haven't cashed my cheque yet (S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent by registered post and received but royal mail website says no electronic proof of receipt available)

 

what happens if they go over the 40 days without replying?

 

You have to give 40 days from the time of receipt as long as you CAN get proof of delivery, you are O.K. for the 40 day limit. What I suspect is that they are behind with the workload of SAR's and might try to use the date of cashing your cheque as the star of the 40 days ...but if you can prove they received it on a certain date ...they've lost that get out scenario.

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

request sent 1st class recorded 17/06/08, request received and signed for

(according to track and trace) 18/06/08. Did I make a mistake in sending it direct to my branch marked FAO the manager?

 

Yes you did make a slight error that has given them the excuse to slow the process down, I advise folks to send it to the registered office of the company then there is no doubt they have got it that's is what the ICO.

advises also....They can't play it out forever though I would ring the RBS data controller up if I were you.... her name is Joyce E Tudor and her phone number is 0131 626 1165......fax number 0131 626 3049

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will most certainly try and delay it but as I said ring their data controller up and tell her that you will only allow a maximum of a further 7 days, if they try the delay angle " this office that deals with SSAR's has not received it" or words to that effect.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...