Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jeremy Sutcliffe Solicitors


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5579 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone, this is my first post and I am hoping that can get some useful advice. This is a long story going back almost 6 years, I live in Scotland so dont know if anything is differant to being in England, I split up with my ex about 6 years ago at the time we had a personal loan with Clydedale bank this was in joint names with his being the first on the agreement, when we split up I asked the bank to split the loan down the middle to allow us to pay individually. They refused to do this, I moved out of the marital home, he stayed with the two children. He had other personal debts, he started getting harassment from Jeremy Sutcliffe Solicitors via letters acting on behalf of the bank. He sought advice from a local council money advisory service, they negotiated with jeremy sutcliffe a payment of £10 per month, a pitiful amount but this was what was agreed. He has been getting constant phonecalls and letters from them for the past 6 years, they are very cheeky stating that he spend too much on phone, gas and even on his 12 year old daughter. They send letters stating that as he has failed to reach an agreement and unless he phones them to discuss the issue they will be going for a decree and have also told him that they can take his house (which is mortgaged) even though he has never missed a payment. I have never heard anything from them but this is obviously as they have their claws into him. He is now at the end of his tether, can't sleep, is drinking, he is willing to pay a bit more each month but feels that this will only keep them at bay for a little while and they will start hassling him again. They are looking for £245 per month, I cant remember how much the original loan was for as during the split the original paperwork was lost, but they now say the amount outstanding is £13,500. He has provided them with a financial statement of all that he pays out but they query everything and are basically saying that he is lying. Neither of us are in a position to pay £245 per month. How can he come to a binding arrangement that will get them off his back and not onto mine, can they take to court if he has stuck to the agreement, not in a position to pay off £13,500 in one go. Has anyone heard of Jeremy Sutcliffe are they solicitors or are they a debt collection agency that would have purchsed this debt from Clydesdale bank?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to hear about what they are doing to you both, they really are just lowlife bullies. I personally would start to turn the tables and make them do some proving now, and earn their money.

 

Use the template letters on here and ask for a copy of the credit agreement and a full statement of account from them. Then you can see what the situation is financially, if they have been applying charges etc - and even if the have the agreement to do any enforcing with!

 

I would also want to know if they own the debt or are still collecting for the bank, find out what the actual position is so you know where to start fighting back. You have got rights, no matter what lies they tell you on the phone.

 

You'll get plenty of support here ; )

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well first of all as this is a consumer credit agreement if any decree was granted a time order could be applied for. This would set out the monthly payments that the court would consider reasonable in line with his ability to pay - not in line with what the pursuer would like him to pay. Only if he then defaulted on this would they be able to apply for a charge on the property.

 

Again as it is a consumer credit account I think he should be asking for a copy of the credit agreement (which may no longer exist) as without this they would not be able to enforce any debt. Template N here is the CCA request. Enclose a £1 postal order and send recorded delivery - do not sign the letter. As part of this also ask for a statement of account, which is free.

 

He should also be looking to see if there are any charges on the account (I would put money on there being quite a lot of charges) which you can claim back to reduce the balance of the account. He can do this via a SAR to Clydesdale bank (template here). He needs to enclose a £10 fee with this and send recorded delivery.

 

Also I think it's best if he starts insisting that all communication is in writing only. Template for this is here. Send it with the CCA request.

 

If they try and put pressure on him to up payments he must just reiterate that the amount of disposable income is all he has and is all he can pay (a court would not award them more). He must also reiterate that all communication is in writing only. If this is really effecting him he may want to consider either changing his phone number (simply inform the phone line provider that you are being harassed and they will change the number) or, if he is a BT customer, get call barring.

 

Regarding harassment I would also have a read here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/99361-you-being-harassed-telephone.html

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I'm back again, followed advice and sent postal order, registered letter to Jeremy Sutcliff and surprise surprise - no reply, last week received a ntice from Fairhalsen Collection group now collecting this debt on behalf of Clydedale bank. Want payment in full or to telephone to speak to them, or they will send someone to the house or arrest wages. jeremy Sutcliff was who the orig arrangement was with, can they just pass this to someone else without informing us ? Do you advise we should answer the letter from Fairhalsen? What about the request to Sutcliff for the orig credit agreement, do we now do this with Fairhalsen ? Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send the CCA request to Jeremy Sutcliffe?

 

The reason i ask is that the original creditior should have the original agreement, to be able to pass the debt onto a Debt Collection Agency. Without this they can not collect on the debt.

 

Jeremy Sutcliffe may not have a copy of the original agreement, so passed this onto another company to let them have the headache of trying to collect the debt.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, sounds like Jeremy Sutcliffe suddenly realised you are aware of your rights and are very aware they are not able to enforce this debt!

 

There is a very appropriate letter I will try and find to send to Fairhalsen (I have dealt with them and they are muppets just like Sutcliffe) telling them that the account is in dispute, you have already made a CCA request to Jeremy Sutcliffe, which you have had no reply, therefore the debt is unenforceable. Also to warn them that they have no permission to deal with your personal data and you will complain/consider court action.

 

Please please, trust Rory - he knows what he is talking about. They cannot just arrest your wages and without the agreement, cannot even attempt it. The threat of visiting your house I can bet is just to scare you into phoning them.

 

I think you should also write to Jeremy Sutcliffe informing them they are in breach of your CCA request (what date did you send it - they may be at the criminal offence stage). Also, if they cannot provide and agreement they cannot prove they had permission to store, process or pass your personal data onto a third party (Fairhalsen) and you will report them to the Information Commissioner.

 

Take heart, they are obviously on the back foot now:D

Give me a mo and will try and find letters!

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SOS, You could try sending something along the lines of this for Jeremy Sutcliffe and amend to suit for Fairhalsen. There is a section at the bottom about the Data Protection Act that you could add in if you wish:

 

June 28, 2006

Idiot DCA

 

Company House,

Church Street,

Newtown,

Kent,

R1 7HG

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Account In Dispute Letter Before Action

I refer to my recent correspondence with your company concerning this alleged debt, copies of which are enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

As **DCA** have failed to comply with my Consumer Credit Act request and admitted that the alleged signed executed agreement is unavailable, enforcement action is impossible under section 127 (3) of the Act.

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enter into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, Your company commit an offence. These time limits expired on XX/XX/XX and XX/XX/XX respectively.

As you are no doubt aware subsection (6) states:

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and (b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

Therefore as at XX/XX/XX this account became unenforceable at law and it is now my intention to refer this matter to the enforcement authorities.

If **DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

It is also my belief that your continued pursuance of this matter also constitutes an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970.

Failure to respond favourably to this letter within fourteen (14) days of receipt will result in immediate litigation being commenced against your company without further notice. I also require a copy of your internal complaints procedure as further action may be necessary.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing

 

DPA blurb:

As there has been no response to my CCA request I can therefore only assume that no proof of this debt was ever held or obtained, including my written consent for your company to process, share or access my personal data. Should you be unable to prove my written consent to process my data I will be making a complaint to the Information Commissioners office regarding this breach of my rights under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Sorry I couldn't cobble it together first, am a bit pushed for time right now! Good luck :)

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,Thanks for the responses, yes the original CCA request was made to Jeremy Sutcliffe, who had been pressuring us to up the monthly payments being made to them. Now that they have passed this to someone else, should we acknowledge the new company (fairhalsen), or just ignore their letters if we were not informed the debt was being passed to someone else? Should we continue to pay the monthly sum of £11.00 to Jeremy Sutcliff who the orig arrangement was made with, although they said that this was no longer acceptable and have been hassling. Which is what instigated the CCA Request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they haven't responded to you cca request then they cannot enforce the debt - you are entitled to stop paying them. They cannot prove the debt or even prove they have a right to collect on it and until they do, they cannot force payment.

 

Send the main letter above to them to inform them they are in breach of your request and you don't have to pay them. You can just ignore fairhalsen if you want, or send a version of that letter informing then the debt is now unenforceable.

 

I wouldn't pay them another penny - but that is entirely up to you. Wonder if they'll bother to reply once you say "I don't have to pay you!"

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...