Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are there different 'rules' for an overdraft debt & a loan debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

When you've helped me, get out in the sun!;):grin:

 

Now, I had two loans with Lloyds. I couldn't keep up the payments, so (cutting it short) I asked them to close my bank account (which was clear) & stop taking payments. They wouldn't do this, they made my account overdrawn by taking the payments out of it each month and adding interest on the 'non-payments', then adding more interest.......

 

Now I'm being chased by a DCA working for Lloyds. The two loans and the overdraft have been lumped together in a big debt, are they supposed to do this, and if not, when I cca them, what should I say about the overdraft part of the debt as I obviously can't cca that, and I believe the rules are different regarding overdrafts:?:

 

Any help on how to proceed would be gratefully appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The two loans and the overdraft have been lumped together in a big debt, are they supposed to do this,

They can but they are still two seperate accounts and can't just magically become one account.
when I cca them, what should I say about the overdraft part of the debt as I obviously can't cca that, and I believe the rules are different regarding overdrafts
Well there would need to be a copy of the agreement for the loan. The overdraft is a completely seperate account and if it is just made up of charges and interest on the charges you can just claim these back to reduce the balance to zero.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I mean should I cca them and let them split up the two loans and the 'overdraft' -just wait and see what they do....?

 

 

Hi Cheesepie,

 

I believe Rory was trying to say that you should send for copies of the agreements for the loans as seperate issues under the CCA. You should also send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for the overdraft again as a seperate issue.

 

BB

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds have put all the debts together (2 loans and an overdraft) under one NEW account number.

Should I cca them for this new account number (which they obviously haven't got a cca for) or refer back to old papers for the other numbers.

 

They haven't told us what this new account number is for... they just wrote and said I owe that amount under that account number.. which is the whole lot together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this has happened with one of mine however the overdraft is all charges bar about £100, and the DCA is asking for payment with the overdraft number and the loan amount

 

Im going to CCA them to see whats what

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds have put all the debts together (2 loans and an overdraft) under one NEW account number.

Should I cca them for this new account number (which they obviously haven't got a cca for) or refer back to old papers for the other numbers.

 

You certainly should ask for a copy of the agreement on this new account which has magically appeared.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't acknowledge any new account - you didn't apply for either and a loan or an overdraft under that account number. If they have closed the old loan account and have amalgamated the loan with another account they canot ask you for payment for the original loan because it no longer exists - they closed the account and you haven't signed an agreement for any new account that would give you either a loan or an overdraft - they have shot themselves in the foot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't acknowledge any new account - you didn't apply for either and a loan or an overdraft under that account number. If they have closed the old loan account and have amalgamated the loan with another account they canot ask you for payment for the original loan because it no longer exists - they closed the account and you haven't signed an agreement for any new account that would give you either a loan or an overdraft - they have shot themselves in the foot.

 

 

If this were true pinky how do you make it hold water in court, what you are saying would be a grenade in the foot not a shot, I say this because it is quite common for Banks to convert overdrafts into loans, so this would be a major coup for cheesepie????

 

BB

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send them a S.A.R. and see what they are playing at. Lloyds current tactic is to terminate a loan account, transfer the debt to an overdraft, then terminate the overdraft. This is an attempt to get past the legal duties and it is, in my view, illegal.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I mean is that they have opened a new account and put an overdraft and 2 loans into the new account. Cheesepie didn't sign to open a new account, he didn't sign for loans on that account and he didn't apply for an overdraft on that account. The accounts that had the original loans and overdraft have been closed so they are finished and the new account has no signed agreements whatsoever. The Co-op did this with another poster and when he pointed out the error of their ways, he hasn't heard a cheap from them since. In my view it is the stupidest thing a bank can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Well................

After CCa 'ing' Lloyds, obviously, we didn't hear anything back from them....... till now!

They have now put the three amounts into seperate account's, and sold them to another dc (Arrow Global Ltd......ever heard of these?) How legal is this? Should we now cca this company for the three 'debts' or, write a letter saying 'not on your nellie' type of thing? Or write a letter telling them it's obviously not legal what Lloyds have done, so send it back to Lloyds?

Any suggestions greatly appreciated from anyone!.....:confused::)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well................

After CCa 'ing' Lloyds, obviously, we didn't hear anything back from them....... till now!

They have now put the three amounts into seperate account's, and sold them to another dc (Arrow Global Ltd......ever heard of these?) How legal is this? Should we now cca this company for the three 'debts' or, write a letter saying 'not on your nellie' type of thing? Or write a letter telling them it's obviously not legal what Lloyds have done, so send it back to Lloyds?

Any suggestions greatly appreciated from anyone!.....:confused::)

 

 

When you say they have put them into 3 Accounts what is their explanation and justification for doing this?

 

You need to send a Subject Access Request to LLoyds if you have not already done so - if you have already a second request for the most recent info should be raised.

 

To my mind if Lloyds think they have 3 accounts to enforce against you then you need to treat each one as different issue. It would seem they have realised the error of their ways in determining how to get the debt settled, and yes it would be legal to sell the accounts on, you would have signed to give your permission whne opening the accounts.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds haven't given an explanation, but I will do what you suggest and see what they say. When I asked if this was legal, what I meant was: Is it legal for them to put all the accounts into a different single account with a brand, spanking new account number, then split them all back up to sell them off? As opposed to just selling them off? (Does that make sense?) Thanks for your help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds haven't given an explanation, but I will do what you suggest and see what they say. When I asked if this was legal, what I meant was: Is it legal for them to put all the accounts into a different single account with a brand, spanking new account number, then split them all back up to sell them off? As opposed to just selling them off? (Does that make sense?) Thanks for your help...

 

Depends if they are quoting the original account no's or not, if legal action follows at some time in the future Lloyds, or whichever dca they try to palm them off to, would have to prove that you held those accounts.

 

They cannot say "oh we have just given them new account number" without referencing the new numbers back to the old ones.

 

Regarding the legallity of what they have done, it would seem that as they now know that you are not going to accept the way the case for collection was being handled, they have revisited their tactics and decided their first approach was not going to work so are trying a different avenue - not much "illegal" in that im afraid

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...