Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

private parking tickets


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would agree that the term "perky" has widened to cover PPCs who seem overly confident of their legal position and who post undefended or poorly defended judgements as some sort of landmark decision in favour of PPCs. No doubt "perky" in one of his no doubt many guises will be back on soon to tell us of another landmark victory and we will all listen with deaf ears. To be honest it would do "perky" and the other PPC posters no harm if they debated the position reasonably and without the strident tone and false confidence that they often show. Then others might listen and be prepared to engage in the debate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Geronimoman but it does appear that as soon as a site suspects a perky (the person or the entity) they close the account so this fuels the silly ids.

it looks like perky (under his id) has not posted for months .. Well I got to page 22 on here and stopped looking, so absent other evidence he has not.

Maybe an admin should have policy of allowing perkys if they are open about their side of the fence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like perky (under his id) has not posted for months .. Well I got to page 22 on here and stopped looking, so absent other evidence he has not.

 

Which part of "he was banned" are you having a problem with?In the new spirit of openness, can I ask you to tell us what your angle is? All your posts so far are pro-PPC. You discuss a case in another thread which is discussed in Perky's website, using more or less the same arguments. Tell us why this area has such fascination for you and no doubt people will be less suspicious as to your motives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My angle is I originally joined this site as I received a parking ticket from Glasgow City Council for parking in Houldsworth Street on double yellow lines and I wanted to check it was legal.

whilst researching I came across the case on private parking, saw a number of people asking questions about Scotland, no person seemed to advise on Scotland so I posted what i found .. On the same day I also paid my ticket to council (but that's a different story)

I am a strong beleive in free speech and everyone should have a right to reply even if their views differ from the majority

 

So that's my history, what about u geronimoman ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing on Companies House for CPS.

Now Combined Parking Solutions could be just a trading name of Perky, i.e. unlimited liability.

 

Now that is interesting.. I would suggest anyone who has an invoice from CPS writes to the DVLA and asks for a copy of the request they made for the RK details. this will also provide the evidence of contract with the landowner. The PPC also has to supply the DVLA with the Data Protection Register registration number. That would be very revealing for CPS tickets I think..I wonder what registration at the ICO was used and who it actually points to ? seems they may have transmitted data 'outside the boundaries' of the Act... and unlimited liability too...

 

IIRC form V888/2 is the one they use to make the request and the last time I looked the DVLA documentation makes it very clear that as the RK you can request and receive all the relevant information.

 

has anyone done this already for a CPS invoice ?

 

(this request to the DVLA for all the details is probably a good thing for anyone who gets a PPC invoice to do if they are going to fight a bit)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lamma, PPC Buster

 

Have a look at this thread here. Its quite relevant to the discussion.

 

And then have a look at this one. Particularly post 12.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right enough I cannot see any DPA listing for CPS, checked against trading name and postcode. I find it hard to believe that perky would be dumb enough to operate without such a registration. It does appear that more checks with the ICO and/or DVLA will be necessary to confirm one way or the other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that, "scottish" mark how you found Perky's DP registration within 2 seconds. Add that to your continuing attempts to publicise some unimportant Oldham case which are now becoming laughable (I'd now wager my life it involves CPS - let's see if that pans out when you or "perky" post back - no doubt following another great victory in the annals of PPC cases) and your lack of condemnation of the personal attacks on Perky's website makes me think you are indeed in the "Wolverhampton" part of Scotland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you fool geronimoman.

Anyone who asks a question is a perky or even perky, instead of throwing allegations why not have something to back it up with.

 

As for finding perky listing, its not difficult just goto the ico website and put in the surname as posted by another member. We know his name is mike and there is no mikes listed only 2 michaels.. Click on the name and it appears.

 

The links above state its a partnership so any reg with the ico would be personal

 

Its not rocket science

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi..regarding post no 43

Long time no post...

Just thought I should let you know how I am getting on. Received last letter regarding Lidl parking charges at the end of June.

These were from a debt recovery co...who were threatening to send an Outside field agent to my house if I didn't pay up within three days.

I sent the draft reply from the sticky -the debt is in dispute and warning about harrassment ...haven't heard from them since...have been away so there is always the chance that they have been here when I wasn't ...but if they did they didn't leave a card or anything...

Thanks to everyone for their help and advice

Will keep you posted if I hear anything else...have now got a problem with another PPC...but will start a new thread about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unlucky67,

 

Thanks for getting back to us. We can firmly put TPS parking solutions in the "no cahones" camp where legal action is concerned.

 

So far only 1 company in the "got cahones but no brains" camp, no prizes for guessing which one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far only 1 company in the "got cahones but no brains" camp, no prizes for guessing which one.

Don't tell me how you know that. You just do!

 

Am I right? :D

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...