Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fixed Parking Penalty Charge - Police


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5852 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I went to visit a friend tonight, left my car parked on the street as I always do, returned to my car to find a "Fixed Penalty Notice" apparently issued by West Yorkshire police.

 

I am totally baffled as why I have been given a ticket, upon further inspection of the fixed penalty notice I can see that there is no "offence code" given as to why I was issued the fine...

 

Also the location of where it says my car was parked is wrong, they have written down the wrong street name.

 

If I do not wish to pay this fine then I have to request the matter be dealt with by a court.

 

Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return the ticket and say you wish to go court, and also that you consider you have not commited any offence. I doubt you will here any more about it! unless you have commited an offence that is. have they got a time and date on the ticket, together with the police officers number and station?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other option is to write to the police station concerned (address it to the borough or divisional commander) and point out that the ticket has inaccuracies and that the best course of action is for them to cancel the ticket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do remember that an FPN is merely an offer to avoid court by paying the fixed penalty. As such, it does not have to be as accurate as the law is not as prescriptive as it is for PCNs.

 

If you elect for court, then the FPN is voided and becomes irrelevant in any further action. It will be replaced by a summons. If the summons is accurate then you could be in trouble. You cannot offer up a dodgy FPN as a defence as the court will likely rule that if you had a query/didn't understand then you should have contacted the Officer or Station concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this ticket have your registration no. on it?

 

 

It does have my registration yes as well as the date and time of the alleged offence.

 

I am considering ringing up west yorkshire police today to find out why the ticket was issued in the first place.

 

The cost is only 30 bob, but its the principal of the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently it is too early to find out what exactly the ticket was issued for, the woman I spoke to in the processing department has advised me to write a letter stating that their are discrepancies on the fpn in order to find out if the ticket is valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cost is only 30 bob, but its the principal of the matter.

 

Then one of two things applies:

 

1) It's very old (pre decimalisation) and unlikely to be followed up.

2) It's a cheap get-out at £1.50 in modern parlance.

 

:D:D

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got one of these the other day too, from Wiltshire Police. The make and model on the ticket are not wholly correct and the ticket appears to have been issued for the offence code 1908 with the words 'NO WAITING' written next to it - here it is.

 

IMG.jpg

 

 

Now, the fact of the matter is that I was parked in a bay marked 'LOADING ONLY' at the time and I was not involved in making commercial collections or deliveries, although I was collecting a substantial amount of cash from the bank.

 

From what it says above, if I opt to go to court then the fact that the ticket seems to be inaccurate is not relevant, is that correct? Assuming that it is correct, I will have to rely on the fact that the road markings do not seem to conform to the regulations set out in The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002. Has anyone got any advice or experience to offer here?

 

If it does go to court then I assume that the police will make an application for costs as well as the fine. Assuming that I were to win at court, could I too make an application for costs incurred in compiling my defence, attending court etc.?

 

Thanks

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you have described will not fit the criteria of loading.

Why do you think the lines were non-compliant?

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bernie_the_bolt.

 

I thought that trying to claim loading as a defence might be pushing it. :)

 

I think that the bay is non compliant because...

 

According to The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002, the loading bay icon should be 100mm-200mm square. In the case of the one at the end of the bay (between the loading and disabled bays) the icon measured only 75mm square. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2002/02311355.gif

 

100_0401.jpg

 

 

 

Here is the bay in question:

 

100_0399.jpg

 

According to diagram 1028.3, Schedule 6 Road markings, each white dash marking the bay should be 600mm long. In this bay the white dashes vary between 590mm and 650mm on the road side of the bay and up to 750mm between the loading and disabled bays. Between the lines there should be a gap of 600mm minimum to 2400mm maximum. The gaps between the dashes vary from 540mm to 620mm.

 

The words 'LOADING ONLY' painted on the road should be between 50mm and 150mm from the white lines marking the bay. In this case the gap varies between 30mm and 60mm.

 

Any comments? I would especially like to hear from anyone who has ever used this defence.

 

Thanks

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...