Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest strange letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5903 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife received a letter this morning 29/03/08 from capquest stating that she owed 309.74 to littlewoods finance and this had been passed on to them for collection.

The letter is dated 27/3/08 and they are saying that they will pass this on to their solicitors to commence legal action on the 1/4/08 if they do not hear from us by the 26/3/08.

Didnt make any sence to me either as all the dates are wrong, but thats how it was written.

Apart from the fact that we have never had any dealings with littlewoods finance and have lived in Scotland for the last 7 years i am not sure what to do about this letter.

Do i contact them and tell them that i have no idea what they are talking about or what?

The letter goes on to say that they will get a warrent of execution and send the bailiffs to us.

Could someone please help as we are worried about this as we live in a remote area and am bothered about comming home and finding our house empty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sparkright send them a CCA request, if you are saying this could be over 7 years old then it may be statute barred.

Dont call them or speak to them on the phone they will only upset you or your wife, simply tell them you will only correspond in writing and keep this thread update at all times.

 

 

Follow link and scroll down to letter N

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-bailiffs-advice/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add that they can not simply send the bailiffs round (as you are in Scotland it would be sheriff officers anyway) they would need to get a decree granted against you and then get an exceptional attachment order through you not paying the decree and only then could they remove non essential items (they are heavily restricted in what they can and can't take). However they would not be allowed to force entry. A CCJ would be of no use as this would be ruled as legally incompetent as you reside in Scotland. You would be notified of any court action by the court and give the opportunity to defend. Remember Capquest are simply a debt collection agency - they have no legal powers whatsoever.

 

I would also report this matter to Trading Standards. There appear to have been a spate of DCA's wrongly tracing people at the moment.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the CCA request there is an alternative. You could simply send a prove it letter (example below). As with all letters to DCA's, dont sign the letter. Send all letters either by recorded delivery or at the very least get proof of posting.

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They must be sending out random letters as I have already read (in the past couple of hours) 4 threads about capquest and littlewoods accounts.

 

My mum received the same letter today 29/03/08 from capquest stating that she owed 100.00 to littlewoods, The letter is dated 27/3/08 and they are saying that they will pass this on to their solicitors to commence legal action, and she must contact them by the 26/3/08.

 

She has never had a Littlewoods account, but after she phoned them (she told me this when I arrived at her home this morning), she was told that it was a debt from 1990, but she didn't even live at this address then.

 

Wikkitt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My wife had a letter yesterday sounds like its the same one you have. They are passing on to solicitors on 1/4/08 blah blah blah.I have sent the letter off posted above regarding legal side and will wait to see what occurs. Oh the sum supposedly owed £71.61p from 1993.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapquest must have gone through an awful lot of paper and ink on the 27th. That is the date on my letter as well. I bet their solicitor isn't looikng forward to the mountain of work that (may) be coming his way.

Is anyone keeping count of the number of letters concerning Littlewoods accounts. :D :D

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly let me thank all of you for your input , it has been a great help.

Neither myself or my wife have ever had an account with Littlewoods so we have no idea what this is about and because of our rural location our doors are never locked so we were concerned about comming home to an empty house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

because of our rural location our doors are never locked so we were concerned about comming home to an empty house.

 

In this day and age I wouldn't recommend anyone leaving their doors unlocked, rural or not. To me, not locking doors is a bad habit to get into. If my house is going to get burgled then they'll have to do it the hard way and hopefully leave clues that will get them caught.

 

Now back on topic. If they do send the baliffs (it won't come to that) they are entitled to gain peaceful entry through an open window or unlocked door.

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do send the baliffs (it won't come to that) they are entitled to gain peaceful entry through an open window or unlocked door.

Please note the OP's location. We do not have bailiffs in Scotland nor do we have exactly the same laws regarding entry. As previously stated you can not just send the sheriff officers round.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me first of all thank all who replied.

The above letter was sent Monday recorded delivery and a reply received today Thursday and reads as follows:-

Dear mrs.W

I write in responce to your recent letter the contents of which have been noted.

Unfortunately i am unable to comment on the dispute you have raised as this was prior to our involvement and at the time the account was passed to us we were unaware of any existing query. Therefore we are closing the account on our system.

Thank you for taking the time in trying to resolve this matter.

yourse sincerely

Ms J Simms

Quality and Assurance officer

 

Hopefully this is the end of the matter.

Thank you all.

Ken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical of Capquest to respond with a standard letter Ken but it's nice to see they have taken their ball home :D

 

They still haven't responded directly to your "Prove It" letter but that's Capquest for you :rolleyes:

 

Don't be surprised if you receive another letter from them in the future. Just make sure you hang on to Ms Simms' letter - just in case ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

My wife received the same standard letter today. I like the way they ""thank you for trying to resolve this matter". Scuse me what about bailiffs, court enforcement, warrant of execution, impounded goods, etc etc etc.What about all the older frail people who receive this sort of bullying letter? How many people just pay up out of fear and probably dont owe a penny. Sounds like a nice little earner. I honestly thought it was a [problem] at first because of the huge amount of threat involved, so the first thing I did was a check on the company on the web. I did report them to consumer direct and had it logged as a possible criminal offence. If everybody does the same maybe they will pay them a visit. I am going to forward a copy of letter sent to us and explain my disgust in the way this company think they can treat people. :mad: :mad: :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

cheers for that. I already have the link for alternative numbers just venting my spleen. On the day we received initial letter my wife visited her mother and her sister and husband were there.He said his mother had received a phone call from cq saying she had 7 hours to pay her phone bill or she would be cut off.She pays by direct debit? What are they up to ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...