Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpayment By Ex-Employer (but now live in another country)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5941 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have been overpaid appx £800 pounds by an ex-employer..

 

They are claiming it was a months wages, and it was paid a month after I had left the company... I had recieved the money in my UK bank account and assumed it was my final wage (holiday etc) so took they money and spent it.. the thing is I recieved the money two days before I was about to leave to UK to return to my home country, (which is in another continent) I took the money and t/f it into but bank account held in my home country.

 

About a month later I received a letter outlining that I had been overpaid and repayment need to be organized, being so far away and having other worried I ignored this letter, after asking for the money back again the company has written a couple more letter stating my legal obligations to pay due to my contract of employment and the last letter stated that if I didn't reply they would be forwarding the file to their solicitors..

 

I really don't know where I stand on this because I am in a different country altogether now and really did not think they would pursue it this far.. I know realize that I am probably legally obliged to pay it back if I cannot prove that I thought it was an honest payment.. How far can they go with me being here and the debt being in the UK?

 

Also I left them my forwarding address willingly just in case my p45 couldnt be sent to my uk address in time, but how do they know I am still at the same address?? What will happen if I just put return to sender on the letters??

 

You would think that it would cost them more money than the debt is actually worth to try and get me to repay the money back but they have also stated that they can make me pay the court costs?????

 

If i did eventually have to be agree on a repayment claim how would this work with exchange rates and bank charges for depositing money into foreign bank accounts, I have no job I am a student and would most likely only be able to afford to pay £20-30 a month which appx £8 would be lost each time in bank chargers!!!

 

Another thing I am worried about is if I continue to ignore and see how far it goes if I will be allowed to re-enter the UK on a holiday? Is it true that debt is written off after 6 years or would this become a criminal offense??

 

As you can see there is quite a lot on my mind and I am pretty stressed, all advice would be much appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Its a difficult one if you agree to repay the money over a period of time i feel the bank charges should be met by your ex-employer.

I am sure someone on the forum will have some experience of a similar situation, and can advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are certain that the money was an overpayment and you are willing to repay it you need to draft a letter to your ex employer offering to pay the money back at whatever rate you can afford. But you also need to work out the extra costs involved due to the problems of transfering money etc and deduct the total amount of these costs from the debt.

Include all this information in your letter to your former employer.

If it is a reasonable offer they should accept it.

I will flag this up for our resident employment specialist to take a look at later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no evidence / proof that it was an overpayment other than their correspondence through letters; although I am quite certain it is. I am not so certain I am willing to repay it as at the time I thought it was my money and I have spent it and really cannot afford to repay it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I have been overpaid appx £800 pounds by an ex-employer..

 

 

 

 

 

.....likely only be able to afford to pay £20-30 a month

 

I have no evidence / proof that it was an overpayment other than their correspondence through letters; although I am quite certain it is.

 

and really cannot afford to repay it..[/quote]

 

I get the impression that you are sure that it is an over payment. I have no idea how far they will take this legally. I would have thought that morally you would want to repay the money.

Good luck with whatever your conscience decides to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is usually treated as money paid under a mistake of fact and there is a general right to recover money paid by mistake however, since you are now an ex-employee, the only way the company can recover the money if you do not repay them voluntarily is to bring any claim to a County Court.

 

The employer is entitled to recover the overpayment, subject to estoppel. Where an employer overpays an employee by mistake the courts will normally bar recovery if the employer led the employee to believe that he is entitled to treat the money as his own, not reasonably expect him to notice overpayment, that the employee has spent the money in good faith and the overpayment was not caused primarily by the fault of the employee. There have been cases where a defence has succeeded where an overpayment occurred as a result of a mistake of fact and the individual has not had to make a repayment. In County Council of Avon v Howlett 1983 the Court of Appeal held that an overpayment of sick pay of £1,000 was not recoverable because the worker was not to blame for the mistake and he had altered his position in good faith before the Council had claimed repayment.

 

For example, you have spent the money that that you were overpaid, you also held a genuine belief that it was yours and it would be inequitable for the employer to reclaim the money. This is the principle of estoppel. In these circumstances it may be possible for you to make out a defence or alternatively lodge a counter claim against the employer in the event that they do issue a claim against you.

 

In order to show that an overpayment is not recoverable, you must demonstrate three things. First you must show that the overpayment was the fault of the company and not you. Second it must have been reasonable for you not to know that you were being overpaid. Third, you must have acted to your disadvantage on the assumption that the payment of salary was correct. The difficulty for you might be the second condition since it is often obvious when an overpayment has occurred and you seem to suggest that you know it has happened. It is not acceptable for you to assume that you have received a substantial increase in pay unless there is some reason to believe that this is the case.

 

First thing is to confirm the overpayment by writing to the company and have them break down the sum they claim has been overpaid.

 

Then take it from there depending on what they come back with.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get the impression that you are sure that it is an over payment. I have no idea how far they will take this legally. I would have thought that morally you would want to repay the money.

 

I originally did not think that it an overpayment, now from what the company is saying I understand that it is, as far as a conscience trust me I do have one, but I am a really broke student dealing with a multi-billion pound company.. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks hagenuk, your advice was really good, although it doesnt mention anything about my legal rights being in another country and where the company stand on how they will make me repay the debt through court? I cant possibly attend court in the uk? will they make me go to court here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot make you do anything and for a sum as, relatively speaking, small as this, I doubt they will chase you too hard. Which country are you in?

 

In any case, I would suggest that you have a strong defence, it is referred to as "change of position" and is summarised in Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd 1991 by Lord Goff wherein he stated.

 

"...where an innocent defendant's position is so changed that he will suffer an injustice if called upon to repay or to repay in full, the injustice of requiring him so to repay outweighs the injustice of denying the plaintiff restitution."

 

I would suggest you obtain a full breakdown of the sum they allege is owed first and then go from there.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will request a full breakdown,

 

I am in australia... the last letter stated that they will be passing the file onto a solicitors, a threat maybe? They also stated I will be forced to pay the legal costs...if any are indured, another threat im not so sure, but other people have said the same as you and said that they doubt they will chase and amount so petty..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...