Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpayment By Ex-Employer (but now live in another country)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have been overpaid appx £800 pounds by an ex-employer..

 

They are claiming it was a months wages, and it was paid a month after I had left the company... I had recieved the money in my UK bank account and assumed it was my final wage (holiday etc) so took they money and spent it.. the thing is I recieved the money two days before I was about to leave to UK to return to my home country, (which is in another continent) I took the money and t/f it into but bank account held in my home country.

 

About a month later I received a letter outlining that I had been overpaid and repayment need to be organized, being so far away and having other worried I ignored this letter, after asking for the money back again the company has written a couple more letter stating my legal obligations to pay due to my contract of employment and the last letter stated that if I didn't reply they would be forwarding the file to their solicitors..

 

I really don't know where I stand on this because I am in a different country altogether now and really did not think they would pursue it this far.. I know realize that I am probably legally obliged to pay it back if I cannot prove that I thought it was an honest payment.. How far can they go with me being here and the debt being in the UK?

 

Also I left them my forwarding address willingly just in case my p45 couldnt be sent to my uk address in time, but how do they know I am still at the same address?? What will happen if I just put return to sender on the letters??

 

You would think that it would cost them more money than the debt is actually worth to try and get me to repay the money back but they have also stated that they can make me pay the court costs?????

 

If i did eventually have to be agree on a repayment claim how would this work with exchange rates and bank charges for depositing money into foreign bank accounts, I have no job I am a student and would most likely only be able to afford to pay £20-30 a month which appx £8 would be lost each time in bank chargers!!!

 

Another thing I am worried about is if I continue to ignore and see how far it goes if I will be allowed to re-enter the UK on a holiday? Is it true that debt is written off after 6 years or would this become a criminal offense??

 

As you can see there is quite a lot on my mind and I am pretty stressed, all advice would be much appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Its a difficult one if you agree to repay the money over a period of time i feel the bank charges should be met by your ex-employer.

I am sure someone on the forum will have some experience of a similar situation, and can advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are certain that the money was an overpayment and you are willing to repay it you need to draft a letter to your ex employer offering to pay the money back at whatever rate you can afford. But you also need to work out the extra costs involved due to the problems of transfering money etc and deduct the total amount of these costs from the debt.

Include all this information in your letter to your former employer.

If it is a reasonable offer they should accept it.

I will flag this up for our resident employment specialist to take a look at later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no evidence / proof that it was an overpayment other than their correspondence through letters; although I am quite certain it is. I am not so certain I am willing to repay it as at the time I thought it was my money and I have spent it and really cannot afford to repay it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I have been overpaid appx £800 pounds by an ex-employer..

 

 

 

 

 

.....likely only be able to afford to pay £20-30 a month

 

I have no evidence / proof that it was an overpayment other than their correspondence through letters; although I am quite certain it is.

 

and really cannot afford to repay it..[/quote]

 

I get the impression that you are sure that it is an over payment. I have no idea how far they will take this legally. I would have thought that morally you would want to repay the money.

Good luck with whatever your conscience decides to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is usually treated as money paid under a mistake of fact and there is a general right to recover money paid by mistake however, since you are now an ex-employee, the only way the company can recover the money if you do not repay them voluntarily is to bring any claim to a County Court.

 

The employer is entitled to recover the overpayment, subject to estoppel. Where an employer overpays an employee by mistake the courts will normally bar recovery if the employer led the employee to believe that he is entitled to treat the money as his own, not reasonably expect him to notice overpayment, that the employee has spent the money in good faith and the overpayment was not caused primarily by the fault of the employee. There have been cases where a defence has succeeded where an overpayment occurred as a result of a mistake of fact and the individual has not had to make a repayment. In County Council of Avon v Howlett 1983 the Court of Appeal held that an overpayment of sick pay of £1,000 was not recoverable because the worker was not to blame for the mistake and he had altered his position in good faith before the Council had claimed repayment.

 

For example, you have spent the money that that you were overpaid, you also held a genuine belief that it was yours and it would be inequitable for the employer to reclaim the money. This is the principle of estoppel. In these circumstances it may be possible for you to make out a defence or alternatively lodge a counter claim against the employer in the event that they do issue a claim against you.

 

In order to show that an overpayment is not recoverable, you must demonstrate three things. First you must show that the overpayment was the fault of the company and not you. Second it must have been reasonable for you not to know that you were being overpaid. Third, you must have acted to your disadvantage on the assumption that the payment of salary was correct. The difficulty for you might be the second condition since it is often obvious when an overpayment has occurred and you seem to suggest that you know it has happened. It is not acceptable for you to assume that you have received a substantial increase in pay unless there is some reason to believe that this is the case.

 

First thing is to confirm the overpayment by writing to the company and have them break down the sum they claim has been overpaid.

 

Then take it from there depending on what they come back with.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get the impression that you are sure that it is an over payment. I have no idea how far they will take this legally. I would have thought that morally you would want to repay the money.

 

I originally did not think that it an overpayment, now from what the company is saying I understand that it is, as far as a conscience trust me I do have one, but I am a really broke student dealing with a multi-billion pound company.. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks hagenuk, your advice was really good, although it doesnt mention anything about my legal rights being in another country and where the company stand on how they will make me repay the debt through court? I cant possibly attend court in the uk? will they make me go to court here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot make you do anything and for a sum as, relatively speaking, small as this, I doubt they will chase you too hard. Which country are you in?

 

In any case, I would suggest that you have a strong defence, it is referred to as "change of position" and is summarised in Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd 1991 by Lord Goff wherein he stated.

 

"...where an innocent defendant's position is so changed that he will suffer an injustice if called upon to repay or to repay in full, the injustice of requiring him so to repay outweighs the injustice of denying the plaintiff restitution."

 

I would suggest you obtain a full breakdown of the sum they allege is owed first and then go from there.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will request a full breakdown,

 

I am in australia... the last letter stated that they will be passing the file onto a solicitors, a threat maybe? They also stated I will be forced to pay the legal costs...if any are indured, another threat im not so sure, but other people have said the same as you and said that they doubt they will chase and amount so petty..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...