Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair Deposit Deductions... Help Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Wondered if anyone can give me advice on a security deposit dispute.

We moved out of our flat on the 2nd Feb and straight into a new flat. Someone from the letting agents came around after we had moved everything out of the old flat to do a check-out. We were supposed to leave the flat domestically cleaned, with the carpets professionally cleaned. A cleaner from the letting agents was supposed to turn up and tell us how much it would cost to clean and what needed doing, but he didn’t and we had to leave quickly to pick up the keys for our new flat.. We were. The woman doing the check out asked us for a receipt for the carpets which I didn’t have at the time but told them I would call the company that did it and get a receipt for the Monday. We then gave them the keys back and went on our way. We then tried to contact them but to no avail and could only get through on Monday to find that they had charged us £110 for the cleaning and £80 to professionally clean the carpets even though we had had them done ourselves (we now have the receipt). They also wanted to charge us £66 for the check out fee which they told us was in the contract. This is what it says:

“To pay costs associated with the checking of the inventory at the end of the tenancy and for the preparation of any renewal or continuation of the agreement”.

What I want to know is can we argue these figures as the landlord or letting agents cannot assume that they can use our deposit for cleaning they need to OK a figure with us and give us the opportunity to correct everything before they go ahead and clean the property. Also with the check-out fee I find this clause quite ambiguous as I had assumed it was relating to any damages or cleaning that were found whilst the check-out was being done, not for the letting agents to hire an outside company to do the check out and then pass the cost onto us. Also, could this come under an unfair clause as it doesn’t mention an exact cost and it leaves it open for the letting agents to charge as much as they want.

If I have a case how do I go about making a complaint, our deposit is kept with the Tenancy Deposit Scheme. Do I need to write a letter to the letting agents with my grievances and if so has anyone got a sample letter they can post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contact details of the scheme where your deposit is/was kept should have been made available to you within 14 days after the deposit was handed in to landlord or agents.

The legislation is clear: 213(5) A landlord who has received such a tenancy deposit must give the tenant and any relevant person such information relating to—

(a) the authorised scheme applying to the deposit,

(b) compliance by the landlord with the initial requirements of the scheme in relation to the deposit, and

© the operation of provisions of this Chapter in relation to the deposit, as may be prescribed.

(6) The information required by subsection (5) must be given to the tenant and any relevant person—

(a) in the prescribed form or in a form substantially to the same effect, and

(b) within the period of 14 days beginning with the date on which the deposit is received by the landlord.

Housing Act 2004 (c. 34)

So this is the first issue to consider. If the above obligations were not fulfilled, next sections of the Act talk about implications.

If the landlord has fulfilled his obligations, the contact details of the specific scheme should be easy to find (tenancy agreement?)

What I want to know is can we argue these figures

Of course. First of all- you paid for cleaning and can provide receipt, secondly check out charges were hidden and therefore unfair. Refuse to accept anything you don't agree with- it's your money and they need to justify retention. Please see a template letter in http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/residential-commercial-lettings/117572-unfair-deposit-deductions.html#post1188882

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. I did see that letter but it doesn't seem to suit our situation. In the letter it threatens court action. I know now that the deposit is held with TDS. Do I still threaten court action.

 

I have attached a copy of my modified letter below: What are your thoughts.

 

Dear Sir,

 

I am writing to you concerning my tenancy of the premises at - CONFIDENTIAL -

I am rather alarmed at the way - CONFIDENTIAL - have dealt with the check-out from this property and are attempting to withhold a large amount of this deposit unfairly. I request that you return my deposit of:

£????.??

- £???.?? extra rent up until 02/02/08

- £??.?? Lightbulbs

________

£????.??

As the premises were left clean and in good repair when the tenancy ended. Allowing for fair wear and tear, the premises were left in the same condition as they were in at the beginning of the tenancy. The premises were domestically cleaned and the carpets were professionally cleaned (receipt provided).

- CONFIDENTIAL - are only returning:

£????.??

- £????.?? extra rent up until 02/02/08

- £???.?? Cleaning Costs (This includes having the carpets professionally cleaned)

- £??.?? Check-out Fee

- £??.?? Lightbulbs

_________

£???.??

 

- CONFIDENTIAL - were required to show us a quote for the cleaning costs, and were required to have given us a chance to clean the property to their standards before new tenants moved in (which we were fully prepared to do). We never saw this quote and - CONFIDENTIAL - cleaned the property, including the carpets, which we had already professionally cleaned without our consultation. A Landlord (or letting agent) cannot assume that the deposit is to be used for preparing the property for new tenants to move in. The deposit is our money and we need to give permission for any of the deposit to be used for cleaning purposes.

They also charged us a check-out fee which we believe to be a hidden charge as this was not mentioned when we checked in.

I require your reply to arrive no later than 14 days after the date of this letter, together with your cheque for any amount not in dispute. If I receive no satisfactory reply by then, I will begin a County Court action for recovery of my deposit without further warning.

 

The Court can order you to pay back the deposit, and the proceedings are very straightforward. Also, the Courts are very sympathetic to tenants whose landlords do not fulfil their statutory obligations.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

- CONFIDENTIAL -

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...