Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just been dismissed - what to do now???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I have stumbled across this forum while researching employment law. I am hoping someone can give me a bit of advice.

 

I was dismissed from my job on Thursday during my probationary review (which took place 2 days after my three month probationary period had ended) I was told the reason for this was that I had not met my January targets and the manager said he did not think that I would be able to cope with the pressure of trying to meet my future targets if he extended my probation.

 

Due to the nature of my business it takes a three month period for things to get up and running and as discussed at my interview and at my review in December, I was not to worry about hitting targets for the first few months of my employment.

 

I have already met targets for March and April as he is well aware and I still have weeks to go til then so no doubt I would have exceeded my targets.

 

I have had no warning that there was any problem with any aspect of my work and at my review in December all was well, I scored 8/10 in the companys measurement.

 

I have since December had problems with this particular manager, in that he has made my life very difficult and I have had to seek advice from HR so I think this is the real reason for my dismissal.

 

Does anyone have any advice on where I stand and what I should do now?

 

 

 

Any advice greatly appreciated.

 

Kind regards,

 

Teresa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I'm sorry to hear you find yourself in this situation.

 

Unfortunately, as you have been employed for less than 12 months, you cannot claim unfair dismissal unless the following applies:

 

Even if you don't have 12 months service, it will be automatically unfair if they sack you because, for example, you:

  • exercise your statutory rights, like the right to written particulars of your terms and conditions
  • are pregnant
  • take/ask to take statutory maternity, paternity or adoption leave
  • are or intend to be a trade union member, or refuse to join a union
  • exercise your rights under the National Minimum Wage Act
  • complain about a health and safety problem
  • report wrongdoing at work ('whistleblowing')
  • exercise your rights in connection with a statutory grievance or disciplinary procedure
  • take part in official industrial action that lasts less than 12 weeks
  • take time off for jury service
  • ask to work flexibly if you've a right to do so
  • exercise your rights under the Working Time Regulations

 

If none of the above are relevant then the only avenue open to you would be wrongful dismissal but that is only if there has been a breach of contract i.e. if they have not complied with the notice period specified in your contract.

 

You could also write to the employer asking them to reconsider, but you need to think carefully if you really want to continue working for a company who treated you in this way. However, if they did reconsider at least it would give you breathing space to find alternative employment.

 

Please let us know if you need any further information.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your prompt reply Ell-enn it is very much appreciated.

 

I wonder if my reporting my manager to HR would be considered as whistleblowing?

 

Also, from info I have picked up from ACAS website, the three-step discipline and dismissal procedure was not followed by the company. Were they required to adhere to this?

 

Teresa

Link to post
Share on other sites

The three step procedure applies only to employees with more than 12 months service I'm afraid.

 

With regards to reporting your manager - that would depend on what you were reporting them for. Whistleblowing is a serious matter and is usually known as malpractice within businesses.

 

The types of malpractice the law covers are:

  • criminal offences
  • failure to comply with a legal obligation
  • miscarriages of justice
  • threats to people's health and safety
  • damage to the environment

 

The law also covers a deliberate attempt to cover up any of these.

 

Kind Regards

 

 

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, thanks you for your reply, it seems as if I dont have a leg to stand on. I have nearly £5000 commission owing to me that I will now not be paid for as the company rules state I must follow all of my sales right through to the end, however I am not going to be able to do this now through no choice of my own. Do you think there is anything I would be able to do regarding that?

 

Many thanks,

 

Teresa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Teresa, I'm really sorry to say I don't think there is anything at all you can do. It really pains me to give you such disappointing information. I wouldn't be surprised if that company make a habit of dismissing employees who have less than 12 months service to avoid paying their commission - a despicable practice, but not uncommon unfortunately.

 

As I said earlier the only thing you could think about is to write and ask them to reconsider their decision. By the way, did they give you the correct notice as per your contract?

 

I hope you soon find an employer who values you.

 

Kind Regards

 

El-enn

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes you are right El-enn, they have done it to eight employees in the past four months. They are even trying to do it to my friend who is 5 months pregnant. They will be well aware that they cannot dismiss a pregnant woman so they are making her life so difficult at work, probably trying to push her into resigning.

 

Anyway thanks for taking the time to offer me your advice.

 

Scales tipped!

 

Teresa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, thanks you for your reply, it seems as if I dont have a leg to stand on. I have nearly £5000 commission owing to me that I will now not be paid for as the company rules state I must follow all of my sales right through to the end, however I am not going to be able to do this now through no choice of my own. Do you think there is anything I would be able to do regarding that?

 

Many thanks,

 

Teresa

 

Maybe not.... depending on the exact wording of the commission clause, it may be that you can (in fact) show a contractual entitlement to this commission.

 

Have you been paid your notice (whatever is stipulated in your contract for someone having 3 (and a bit) months service) or do you expect to receive this in February?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are right El-enn, they have done it to eight employees in the past four months. They are even trying to do it to my friend who is 5 months pregnant. They will be well aware that they cannot dismiss a pregnant woman so they are making her life so difficult at work, probably trying to push her into resigning.

 

Anyway thanks for taking the time to offer me your advice.

 

Scales tipped!

 

Teresa x

I'm not 100% sure about this but, from what I've been reading on other threads, if your friend is pushed into resigning then this could be seen as constructive dismissal.

Hopefully someone will be able to confirm or deny this

 

Good luck.

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe not.... depending on the exact wording of the commission clause, it may be that you can (in fact) show a contractual entitlement to this commission.

 

I have nearly £5000 commission owing to me that I will now not be paid for as the company rules state I must follow all of my sales right through to the end

 

The OP has stated the rules for qualifying.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

I have stumbled across this forum while researching employment law. I am hoping someone can give me a bit of advice.

 

I was dismissed from my job on Thursday during my probationary review (which took place 2 days after my three month probationary period had ended) I was told the reason for this was that I had not met my January targets and the manager said he did not think that I would be able to cope with the pressure of trying to meet my future targets if he extended my probation.

 

Due to the nature of my business it takes a three month period for things to get up and running and as discussed at my interview and at my review in December, I was not to worry about hitting targets for the first few months of my employment.

 

I have already met targets for March and April as he is well aware and I still have weeks to go til then so no doubt I would have exceeded my targets.

 

I have had no warning that there was any problem with any aspect of my work and at my review in December all was well, I scored 8/10 in the companys measurement.

 

I have since December had problems with this particular manager, in that he has made my life very difficult and I have had to seek advice from HR so I think this is the real reason for my dismissal.

 

Does anyone have any advice on where I stand and what I should do now?

 

 

 

Any advice greatly appreciated.

 

Kind regards,

 

Teresa

 

It appears you did not receive a weeks notice of dismissal.

 

Also, probationary periods mean nothing in UK employment law.

 

Your employers seemed to have been happy with your work up until December and you say you have already met targets for future months already. And you state that at interview & reviews you were told that hitting targets wasn't an absolute for the first few months.

 

Capability doesn't seem to have been an issue at any time, in fact, quite the opposite. Obviously no opportunity was given to put things right as nothing appears to have been wrong.

 

Can you please provide detail of any written contract you may have that mentions dismissal?

 

If you were not given a written contract can you please provide detail of what your Employment Terms state about dismissal?

 

Also, is it possible there may be an underlying reason for your dismissal as capability appears not to be the issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are right El-enn, they have done it to eight employees in the past four months. They are even trying to do it to my friend who is 5 months pregnant. They will be well aware that they cannot dismiss a pregnant woman so they are making her life so difficult at work, probably trying to push her into resigning.

 

Anyway thanks for taking the time to offer me your advice.

 

Scales tipped!

 

Teresa x

 

Can you contact these 8 ex-employees?

 

You also say that they are trying to do it (dismiss) your friend who is pregnant. Can you explain a bit clearer please?

 

As in what are the employers doing to her for you to think/know this?

 

(Btw, a pregnant woman can be sacked. Depending on the reason of course.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP has stated the rules for qualifying.

 

But she needs to check that the rules are actually in the contract, and have not just been made up retrospectively.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, thanks you for your reply, it seems as if I dont have a leg to stand on. I have nearly £5000 commission owing to me that I will now not be paid for as the company rules state I must follow all of my sales right through to the end, however I am not going to be able to do this now through no choice of my own. Do you think there is anything I would be able to do regarding that?

 

Many thanks,

 

Teresa

 

Hello again, I missed this point.

 

Did commission form part of your salary?

 

Can you please work out your effective hourly rate of pay with the reference period being your employment start and end date? (Obviously do not include this £5k)

 

Also, it is possible that 'unfair contract terms' apply to employment contracts and this appears to be the case. You have earnt money, you have been dismissed without notice and you will not be paid monies for no obvious fault of your own.

 

It's scandlous.

 

From what you have posted you do seem to have a case for wrongful dismissal & breach of contract, dismissal without notice and a possible award being increased by up to 50% due to your ex-employer's failure to follow statutory procedures.

 

Other complaints could well be made depending on what your replies will be to other questions posed.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

WOW! Thank you for all your replys, much appreciated! I havent been on here for a while as have been pre occupied with starting a new job. I wrote a letter to my ex employers last month stating a formal grievance regarding my dismissal and my commission. I have received a reply yesterday saying I have to choose whether to meet with them to discuss my grievance or to follow the modified procedure where they will just reply in writing. I am unsure what to do just now. I am going to look into some of the advice above and will update shortly.

 

Many thanks,

 

Teresa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe not.... depending on the exact wording of the commission clause, it may be that you can (in fact) show a contractual entitlement to this commission.

 

Have you been paid your notice (whatever is stipulated in your contract for someone having 3 (and a bit) months service) or do you expect to receive this in February?

 

I was paid £60 into my bank account at the end of February. I was due 1 weeks wage in lieu of notice, (yearly salary £15,000) also £200 commission (from Januarys sales) I have never recieved my wage slip so I dont know how they arrived at the £60 figure.

 

Teresa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe not.... depending on the exact wording of the commission clause, it may be that you can (in fact) show a contractual entitlement to this commission.

 

Have you been paid your notice (whatever is stipulated in your contract for someone having 3 (and a bit) months service) or do you expect to receive this in February?

 

 

From my Offer of Employment and Contract:

 

You are entitled to participate in relevant incentive, bonus and commission schemes applicable to your role. There is no guaranteed level of earnings from these schemes and the company reserves the right to amend the schemes from time to time. The company will give 30 days notice of any changes to the scheme. In the event of an absence over four weeks (except OML) the company reserves the right to withdraw ant bonus payment.

 

 

From my employee handbook - Terms and Conditions of Employment:

 

Bonus and Commission

 

In some departments, an Incentive, commision and bonus schemes may apply. Details of such schemes are sent to you along with your offer letter or can be obtained from your line manager. There is not a guaranteed level of earnings from these schemes and the company reserves the right to amend these schemes from time to time. The company will give 30 days notice of any changes to the scheme.

 

To qualify for commission, each sale must be completed, delivered to the customer and paid for.

 

The company reserves to with hold bonus payment or commission payment if there has been any absence during the month in which the bonus is being paid.

 

You should understand that to be entitled to bonus or commission for any period you must be employed by the company on the final day of that period . It is not group policy to pro rata such payments if any colleague is not employed by the company on the final working day of that period prior to the entitlement date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears you did not receive a weeks notice of dismissal.

 

Also, probationary periods mean nothing in UK employment law.

 

Your employers seemed to have been happy with your work up until December and you say you have already met targets for future months already. And you state that at interview & reviews you were told that hitting targets wasn't an absolute for the first few months.

 

Capability doesn't seem to have been an issue at any time, in fact, quite the opposite. Obviously no opportunity was given to put things right as nothing appears to have been wrong.

 

Can you please provide detail of any written contract you may have that mentions dismissal?

 

If you were not given a written contract can you please provide detail of what your Employment Terms state about dismissal?

 

Also, is it possible there may be an underlying reason for your dismissal as capability appears not to be the issue?

 

 

 

With reference to your last comment yes in my opinion there was an underlying reason for my dismissal, a combination of the fact that I was treated badly by my line manager (which was reported to HR director on two separate occassions) and also another very good, experienced salesman had handed in his notice and as the company wanted to keep him they asked what they could that would make him stay and he said my job! I dealt with specialised sales and therefor had fewer hours and higher earnings than the other sales people.

 

There doesnt seem to be anything specifically about dismissal in my contract, just disciplinary and grievance procedures.

 

However it does have a clause regarding the probationary period.

 

Teresa

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my Offer of Employment and Contract:

 

You are entitled to participate in relevant incentive, bonus and commission schemes applicable to your role. There is no guaranteed level of earnings from these schemes and the company reserves the right to amend the schemes from time to time. The company will give 30 days notice of any changes to the scheme. In the event of an absence over four weeks (except OML) the company reserves the right to withdraw ant bonus payment.

 

 

From my employee handbook - Terms and Conditions of Employment:

 

Bonus and Commission

 

In some departments, an Incentive, commision and bonus schemes may apply. Details of such schemes are sent to you along with your offer letter or can be obtained from your line manager. There is not a guaranteed level of earnings from these schemes and the company reserves the right to amend these schemes from time to time. The company will give 30 days notice of any changes to the scheme.

 

To qualify for commission, each sale must be completed, delivered to the customer and paid for.

 

The company reserves to with hold bonus payment or commission payment if there has been any absence during the month in which the bonus is being paid.

 

You should understand that to be entitled to bonus or commission for any period you must be employed by the company on the final day of that period . It is not group policy to pro rata such payments if any colleague is not employed by the company on the final working day of that period prior to the entitlement date.

 

My advice is to try and claim this amount. Hopefully they'll offer you part of it as a settlement.

 

I can't remember the reference, but I think there was a Court of Appeal case about bonuses.... anyone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...