Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair deposit deductions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, I hope you can help.

I began a tenancy through a real estate agency for a semi furnished studio apt on Feb 1st 2007. All rent was paid on time every month. The tenancy ran smoothly, and started with a 6 month contract, and when that was up I moved to a month to month basis.

I moved out on 2nd Jan, and after 2 weeks recieved my bond, at least in part. I paid 500, agreed as per the contract to the 47GBP 'check out fee', and thought that would be that. I did not think I would have any issues due to the fact that the agency allowed contractors into my flat on 4 occasions without giving me the proper 24 hours notice. I complained at the time, they apologised, I told them they breached contract, but left it at that.

Now, they have deducted the following:

* Clean heavily scaled toilet - 28GBP

* Clean cooker - 60GBP

* Wipe out fridge, defrost freezer and re-attach flap - 35GBP

Total deductions = 123 GBP

Is it me or does that seem unfair? I have photos of basically everything when I moved in, except fridge/freezer, with timestamps to prove the dates. I understand the contract says that I must leave the apartment in the condition I found it in, less the normal wear and tear. Believe me, I have proof that the flat was not clean at all - this was cleaned by me upon arrival at my own expense and time.

As a side note, the agency was informed that the freezer was not working well, and I could not unplug and defrost due to the plug being behind the oven, which I couldn't move. The fridge was wiped out properly. The oven was left in a dirty state, but no dirtier than when I moved in.

I have written to the agency on 3 occasions stating my argument, and they are not budging. They have now said that although we started the tenancy before the April date for tenancy scheme, they may help us to resolve the dispute.

I would be willing to perhaps go halves with the agent, but if they are going to be like this, I could also claim that as they breached their own contract on several occasions, the contract is void, and therefore they cannot legally take my money. Is that right? Which avenue do I persue here?

Thank you for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you thought of taking them to the small claims court? I don't have any legal expertise, but it sounds like you have a good case, and the agency will probably settle out of court to avoid the possible expense of going to court, and the risk of damaging their credit score.

 

Jeff

 

Hello all, I hope you can help.

I began a tenancy through a real estate agency for a semi furnished studio apt on Feb 1st 2007. All rent was paid on time every month. The tenancy ran smoothly, and started with a 6 month contract, and when that was up I moved to a month to month basis.

I moved out on 2nd Jan, and after 2 weeks recieved my bond, at least in part. I paid 500, agreed as per the contract to the 47GBP 'check out fee', and thought that would be that. I did not think I would have any issues due to the fact that the agency allowed contractors into my flat on 4 occasions without giving me the proper 24 hours notice. I complained at the time, they apologised, I told them they breached contract, but left it at that.

Now, they have deducted the following:

* Clean heavily scaled toilet - 28GBP

* Clean cooker - 60GBP

* Wipe out fridge, defrost freezer and re-attach flap - 35GBP

Total deductions = 123 GBP

Is it me or does that seem unfair? I have photos of basically everything when I moved in, except fridge/freezer, with timestamps to prove the dates. I understand the contract says that I must leave the apartment in the condition I found it in, less the normal wear and tear. Believe me, I have proof that the flat was not clean at all - this was cleaned by me upon arrival at my own expense and time.

As a side note, the agency was informed that the freezer was not working well, and I could not unplug and defrost due to the plug being behind the oven, which I couldn't move. The fridge was wiped out properly. The oven was left in a dirty state, but no dirtier than when I moved in.

I have written to the agency on 3 occasions stating my argument, and they are not budging. They have now said that although we started the tenancy before the April date for tenancy scheme, they may help us to resolve the dispute.

I would be willing to perhaps go halves with the agent, but if they are going to be like this, I could also claim that as they breached their own contract on several occasions, the contract is void, and therefore they cannot legally take my money. Is that right? Which avenue do I persue here?

Thank you for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wanderingsoul; the templates, info and advice are in the stickies on top of the forum. The road map is there, but do you really want to follow it? This is one of the cases where although there may be a substantial chance of success- is the hassle worth £123? It may give you stress, harassment; you will need to put some proper effort in putting it all together...

I know that £123 isn't peanuts, but my advice to you on this one is walk away, ain't worth the hassle. Not only because the amount is low, but also because the amount you were charged seems not grossly unreasonable for the work carried out and now you are getting in a whole argument whether this work was necessary. And this argument can go round and round till the cows come home.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply guys.

I would be willing to cover some cost, and I know it is hardly worth it to chase this down, but I do need the entire deposit back for a new deposit.

 

Based on the condition of the property at the start of tenancy, I do not agree with the amounts charged. 60 quid to clean an oven? How long does that really take? 10 minutes? I have never met a cleaner earning this much money before! More than a lawyer! I had to clean it when I arrived. perhaps I should charge THEM 60 quid.

 

35 quid to defrost a freezer and re-attach a flap? After I had informed the agent I could not access the plug to defrost it and they said 'don't worry about it' ?? What does that take? Unplug freezer - 5 mins. Allow to defrost (no effort). Re-attach flap - 6 seconds.

 

I should send them a bill for my efforts of cleaning the filthy apartment when I first got there. Of course I ticked the box on the form saying that it was in a general good condition. If you don't , then you don't have a deal, and therefore you are on the street despite already paying over a thousand pounds.

 

My family has been in Real Estate (not in UK) for over 35 years. I know they go into this trying to keep as much of the deposit as possible. I'm standing up to all companies that try to rip me off ANY amount. So, yes, 123 quid is worth it to me.

 

I am sending a letter before action directly to the owner, thought the agent is trying to make me go through arbitration by the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, despite the fact the tenancy started before their powers came into affect.

 

It seems to me I am better off going for the letter before action, as legally I can get them on breach of contract for their past sins. If I go down their route of arbitration, they probably have more chance of defending themselves even though I do not agree. What do you think???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

If a small business gets a CCJ, it will harm their chances of getting credit. I therefore think a strongly worded letter threatening to take them to court, followed if necessary by the issuance of a claim, will do the trick. Even if their lawyer thinks they can win, you can never be sure what the judge will decide, so they'll probably err on the side of caution.

 

I would ask not only for you want from them, but also reimbursement for the time you have spent researching the law, writing to them, etc, and for the stress and inconvenience this matter has caused you. In negotiation, it's always best to start with high demands in my opinion. They might think they have gotten off lightly if you accept with feigned reluctance what you wanted in the first place!

 

Good luck

 

Jeff

 

Hello all, I hope you can help.

I began a tenancy through a real estate agency for a semi furnished studio apt on Feb 1st 2007. All rent was paid on time every month. The tenancy ran smoothly, and started with a 6 month contract, and when that was up I moved to a month to month basis.

I moved out on 2nd Jan, and after 2 weeks recieved my bond, at least in part. I paid 500, agreed as per the contract to the 47GBP 'check out fee', and thought that would be that. I did not think I would have any issues due to the fact that the agency allowed contractors into my flat on 4 occasions without giving me the proper 24 hours notice. I complained at the time, they apologised, I told them they breached contract, but left it at that.

Now, they have deducted the following:

* Clean heavily scaled toilet - 28GBP

* Clean cooker - 60GBP

* Wipe out fridge, defrost freezer and re-attach flap - 35GBP

Total deductions = 123 GBP

Is it me or does that seem unfair? I have photos of basically everything when I moved in, except fridge/freezer, with timestamps to prove the dates. I understand the contract says that I must leave the apartment in the condition I found it in, less the normal wear and tear. Believe me, I have proof that the flat was not clean at all - this was cleaned by me upon arrival at my own expense and time.

As a side note, the agency was informed that the freezer was not working well, and I could not unplug and defrost due to the plug being behind the oven, which I couldn't move. The fridge was wiped out properly. The oven was left in a dirty state, but no dirtier than when I moved in.

I have written to the agency on 3 occasions stating my argument, and they are not budging. They have now said that although we started the tenancy before the April date for tenancy scheme, they may help us to resolve the dispute.

I would be willing to perhaps go halves with the agent, but if they are going to be like this, I could also claim that as they breached their own contract on several occasions, the contract is void, and therefore they cannot legally take my money. Is that right? Which avenue do I persue here?

Thank you for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...