Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LOWELLS Financial Services - Campaign against unfair policies of DCA's


MrTWS
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have now received third letter in chain from red debt collection services and photo signatured Andrew Bartle - Chief Operations Officer.

Action taken by me - Filed with other two letters!

Any other threats will be dealt with as they occur

 

For info am now watching this thread with interest and whole-hearted support for getting Watchdog involved

Kernow247

Cornwall, UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks like there are a lot of people out there that have recently recieved letters from Lowell. I have just recieved the first letter so no doubt will recieve another 2 letters. I dont have a clue what they are after as the first letter says, can you call and update details of your address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This present campaign of Lowells which involves a load of UNENFORCABLE debt they purchased from Barclaycard on 14 Dec last really needs to be highlighted in the media. Goodness knows how many folk have fallen for their threats and distortions of the legality of the debt and coughed up.

 

 

Can I just say I have been in touch with the OFT, if you ring them on

 

0845 04 05 06

 

They WILL pass your complaint onto trading standards who HAVE to act by law.

 

This company are committing a criminal offence by their actions THEY CAN BE PROSECUTED

 

1. Demanding money by Menace

2. Harrassment

3. Obtaining money by Deception

 

 

The OFT also suggested the Financial ombudsman is interested in this company.

 

Their number is 0845 0801800

 

Please the more of us complain the quicker this gets dealt with

Link to post
Share on other sites

For all those that have these letters to hand I strongly suggest and recommend a call to the OFT on 08454 04 05 06 (Sorry tupty - wrong number shown!!) ;) Wheels are in motion from Cornwall.

Am advised that alerts/notification will be sent to Local Trading Standard office/s - To add benefit to what WE can all read on the internet, would suggest letting the local Citizens advice bureaus know as well.

Am taking myself there now.

Kernow247

Cornwall, UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing. They sent me a stat demand for stat barred debt, Maybe they thought 'Hey the word 'stat' seems to apply here! Can't be bad. Let's get some letters off.' Who was the donkey that came up with 'Red' lol? I took it to mean don't pay. Red = stop! Ha ha ha. Pillowks. Punish them ODC. :) :) :)

What sort of world do you want your kids to grow up in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company are committing a criminal offence by their actions THEY CAN BE PROSECUTED

 

1. Demanding money by Menace

2. Harrassment

3. Obtaining money by Deception

 

Please the more of us complain the quicker this gets dealt with

 

Everyone please remember that it is acceptable for a DCA to request payment for a statute barred debt, but once this fact is made known to them and you will not be paying because of this fact, they MUST back off.

 

Their current tactics are in breach of a number of OFT collection guidelines namely:

 

2.7 Dealings with debtors are not to be deceitful and/or unfair.

2.8 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. sending demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that

they are the debtor in question, for example, threatening debt recovery

action to 'the occupier' or sending a payment demand to all people sharing

the same name/date of birth as a debtor in the hope that contact with the

correct debtor will be made.

b. disclosing debt details to an individual when it is uncertain that they are

the debtor in question, for example, disclosing details to 'the occupier' of

an address.

 

The OFT Guidelines can be found here: http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting round to it soooooon. I'm very particular about things. I got many companies I need to inform of this fact. I will do it all at once. I got to get all my paperwork together. Been so overwhelmed dealing with the debts of another it has left me a bit drained and bewildered. Plus, I just started on my Cabot C.C.J..

What sort of world do you want your kids to grow up in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr TWS

 

A lot of folk on here never had any contact with the DCAs until they registered with Ezperian. The DCAs and the CRAs are very closely connected and share information. I would advise being very careful as members here have had DCAs contacting them out of the blue, not to mention being innundated with offers of Credit Cards and Consolidation Loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As ODC has pointed out be VERY wary of using the CRA's services.

It has been found that once you view your file, alot of "things" start to appear out of the wood work.

 

For a quick and FREE overview of your credit file have a look at these people: Free credit report, credit check - annualcreditreport.co.uk

 

Don't bother with paying as the mail options is pretty quick.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may be - just a. n. other question - for any legal eagles out there.

 

How can XYZ Ltd or plc et al (in the UK) sell on to another company what in the majority of our current readers of this thread, appear to be statute barred debts imaginary or otherwise account/credir card details, last apparent known addresses - under the 'protection of data acts'

 

Anyone have any ideas?

Kernow247

Cornwall, UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully support a campaign against this shoddy company.

 

I got Lowelled and am on my 3rd set of letters, now from Red Debt. To date Lowell have:

 

  • Placed a search on my credit file without my authorisation
  • Phoned to confirm if I lived at an address I've never heard of
  • Sent me 2 demands for repayment of debts totallying nearly £4k for 2 Barclaycards I've never owned
  • Ignored a CCA request I've put on them and continued to send threats for payment

Now I know I don't owe this money because I've never owned a Barclaycard before last year (and the balance on that is zero). I'm hoping they will send me some documentation in reply to my CCA request as I have a feeling that, if they do send me details of somebody else's debt, they'll be in breach of the Data Protection Act for discussing details of an account with anyone but the owner of that account. If this transpires I'll be more than happy to roast their 'gentlemens assets' on a spit over an open flame.

 

If they don't send me details in response to the CCA request I'm going to send them a Statue Barred template and if I get a single mail after that I'll be on to the OFT.

 

What I think will work with these clowns is a viral campaign. If they phone, record them and upload to YouTube under their name. Register a domain (e.g. "AntiLowell.co.uk"), put all these stories on there with recordings and scans of their letters and then email every national newspaper around with the URL. If there's enough evidence of harassment in one place the papers would jump all over it... and them. I'd also write to your local MP if they ignore CCA requests or Statue Barred letters - they're pretty much obliged to write to Lowells to see what's going on and having to respond to an MP letter always rattles cages in companies.....and if they keep coming in again and again and again.

 

There are perfectly legal ways to make this company's life as miserable as they make other's lives. We should start doing it. I'll have a wee think about the best way to go about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...