Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

In a pickle !!


alexander
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Back in November my mobile phone suffered water damage, i have an insurance policy which covers me however when a replacement phone was sent it was broken, i sent it back weeks ago and heard nothing.

 

I chased the insurance company this morning who told me as the phone had a fault and was not damaged it was returned to the manufature under warranty and another phone would be sent out in a few weeks.

 

In the meantime i am paying line rental with T Mobile and have paid £25.00 excess from when i sent the original phone back.

 

I don't see why i should have to suffer just because they sent me a faulty phone.

 

Anybody offer any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would poin o the terms in the contract and demand that they fulfill them. The fact that the phone was faulty is not you problem - its theirs. If they cause trouble, state that you will pursue damages in the court for breach of warranty - but back it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

Unfortunately it is the responsibility of the insurance company rather than the network provider, as it is the insurance company who have provided you with the phone (T-Mobile do not provide their own insurance, they simply direct you to a third party company). But it is appalling that the insurance company will not simply replace the handset; I would raise a formal complaint re this, pointing out that you are still having to pay line rental for a phone contract which you cannot use due to them providing you with a faulty phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the phone was purchased from T-Mobile direct, presumably the insurer is Fonesafe (CPP)?

 

But I should point out, I believe it is different if you pruchased through carphone warehouse or fone4u etc, I believe they do provide their own insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it that fonesafe are owned by Tmobile? It seems it to me. Reading the policy summary, it says that if there is a problem with them phone, you can either call callsafe or go to a T mobile store.

 

This suggests to me taht T Mobile act as agnets for fonesafe. I would go instore and speak to a manager. Alternatively, register a formal complaint and if no satisfaction contact the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny T mobile say fonesafe act as a seperate independant company to them and that there is nothing they can do. Fonesafe say they are a partnership to Tmobile, they have told me their is nothing they can do as they only sort out claims and don't stock the phones, they have referred me to a company called intec who are the manufactures who sent me the broken phone in the first place.

 

It's bloody ridiculous ! I will be without a phone for up to a month whilst they fix the broken phone they sent me in the first place !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

put in an official complaint telling them that if it is no resolved to your satisfaction you WILL go to the FOS. This will cost them a couple of hundred quid just for the FOS being notified (they have to pay that - it costs you nothing) and may make them think twice. Usually insurers work out whether or not it is cheaper to resolve a complaint or let it go to the FOS - sad really as complaints should not be dealt with this way.

Also report this to Consumer Direct, at least for intelligence purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will, but that is a maximum. They are key stages that the insurer has to follow as well. Also, even with your loss, the ombudsman can rule tha the insurer should reimburse losses - the decision is binding on the insurer but not you, so you can still go to court. It wont solve the problem immediately but it is a long term solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fonesafe are a completely separate company... T-Mobile direct you to them if you want insurance, but you are free to get it elsewhere if you want. A T-Mobile store will not be able to assist you, other than to take care of blocking imeis etc if phone is lost, and letting you call Fonesafe. You will have to speak to Fonesafe, but I would certainly put in a formal complaint as advised by Gyzmo, their behaviour is appalling!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why I mention T Mobile as Agents is that the fonesafe website specifically mentions that one can go into a T Mobile store. If T Mobile are doing things on behalf of fonesafe then in my mind that creates an agency.

 

This seems like similar circumstances to Aldi, which is several companies for each operation. If one does something wrong, the rest is immune from prosecution - which incidentally is an a**e for enforcement purposes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...