Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • whitelist your comment isn't very helpful. Advising people to get advice from two different places is possibly the worst advice you can give in a situation like this.
    • Ok I'm up to speed. I really need to know when your court date is, that is very important. I also need to see a copy of your transfer notice which allocated it to your local county court please.
    • Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review the documents. I apologize for any confusion and for not providing a complete story earlier. Let me address your questions and provide a clearer chronology of events: • Purchase Date from Amazon Germany: June 12, 2020 • Item Failure Date: May 2022 • Notification to Amazon within Warranty Period: June 2022 • Return Arrangements to Amazon: The agent from Amazon emailed me the request to send the item back. • Issues with Warranty Period: When I raised the issue of the lost parcel with Amazon, they mentioned being out of the warranty period, even though they had previously initiated the return process. It seems the date had passed, but that wasn’t the case. I initiated the return within the warranty period (before June 12, 2022), but the return hadn’t generated a label (it needed to be sent abroad). So, I contacted Amazon, and they instructed me about the process on June 26—handling everything myself and the cost to be reimbursed later. • Choice of Interparcel: Interparcel was one of the few couriers/brokers that would ship the item to Slovakia. • Involvement of parcel2go: I used "The Evri International" service, which is operated by Parcel2go.com Limited (company number 02591405) under the Evri brand. This led me to decide to go after them. I realize the importance of answering the questions and apologize for any oversight. Here are the additional details and clarifications: • Witness Statement and Court Bundle: I haven't prepared these, as I wasn’t aware they were needed. • Mediation: I did attend mediation; however, Parcel2go rejected all my claims. I understand the gravity of possibly having to abandon the current case and pursue Interparcel or Evri directly. Your advice is invaluable, and I will provide any further information required to help assess the situation and determine the best course of action. Thank you again for your assistance.
    • Did as advised no ccj at all is showing up also paid for trust online just to make sure and nothing there either Thanks everyone for help and advice  It is much appreciated xx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

wills etc


rdm2006
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

does anyone know if this is legal

 

My wife has two sisters who were executers in their parents will. when the parents died, the two sisters recived a copy of the will as executers but the sols (despite being asked) will not send a copy to my wife as she was not an executrix. I beleive this to be incorrect am i right.

 

The other point is that shortly before the parents died the other two sisters convinced them to change the will (my wife was originally to inherit their house as the other two are financially sound). The husband of one of the sisters is a solicitor and he drew up the new will which was witnessed by a person who had no interest in the will.

 

i beleive that this is not just morally incorrect but also incorrect in law

 

 

can anyone help ?

 

 

are these two actions correct in law?

 

i beleive that as the brother in law was an indirect beneficiary he should not have done this and also believe that all the sisters should receive a copy of the will as direct beneficiaries.

 

What can i do to force the firm of solicitors who actually dealt with the dividing of the estate to supply my wife with a copy of that will?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife has two sisters who were executers in their parents will. when the parents died, the two sisters recived a copy of the will as executers but the sols (despite being asked) will not send a copy to my wife as she was not an executrix. I beleive this to be incorrect am i right.

 

The solicitors holding the will did the correct thing. Only the assigned executors would receive a copy of the will.

 

The other point is that shortly before the parents died the other two sisters convinced them to change the will (my wife was originally to inherit their house as the other two are financially sound). The husband of one of the sisters is a solicitor and he drew up the new will which was witnessed by a person who had no interest in the will.

 

i beleive that this is not just morally incorrect but also incorrect in law

 

can anyone help ?

 

are these two actions correct in law?

 

i beleive that as the brother in law was an indirect beneficiary he should not have done this and also believe that all the sisters should receive a copy of the will as direct beneficiaries.

 

What can i do to force the firm of solicitors who actually dealt with the dividing of the estate to supply my wife with a copy of that will?

 

The changed will can be written by the son-in-law, anybody can write a will. However, signing of the new will must have been witnessed by usually two persons who are not beneficiaries, nor spouses of beneficiaries, nor an executor/exectrix.

 

Sadly, morality has nothing to do with legal documents:cry:

 

I do not think you can force the firm to provide a copy of the will. Once the will is proven with the Probate Office, it becomes a public document. You can purchase a copy from 1st Avenue House, High Holburn, London, once the latest register has been compiled.

 

Also, the executors should do the division of the estate not the solicitors - unless the solicitors were also joint executors with the two sisters, or instructed by the executors to do so.

Your in-laws were free to assign anybody to be their executors and divide the estate as they wish - as long as it was not under duress, or mentally incapable. You could check with the witness/es how the will was drawn up and that they actually witnessed the signing by the donor.

 

A will can be challanged but would require special legal advise and costs.

 

Good luck,

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly what the probate manager told me some 30 years ago, only the beneficiaries under a will are entitled to be supplied a copy by the executors.

 

If a solicitor draws up a will under which he benefits there is a presumption of undue influence whoever witnesses it. I cannot say for certain, but I should be surprised if the same rule does not apply when a solicitor draws up a will under which his wife benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you john i will write to them to obtain a copy

 

Please be aware that if the will was proven only recently it may not yet be available. I know that Birth, Death and Marriage certificates are available from one year and one day after the year they were registered. I am not sure the time delay for wills/admons.

 

The Principal Probate Registry started functioning on 12 January 1858. From this date a copy of every will proved is to be found at the Probate Search Room, First Avenue House, 42-49 High Holborn, London WC1V 6NP (tel: 020 7947 7022).

 

Publications - Guidance - Probate - Guide to obtaining copies of probate records

 

Regards,

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...