Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Direct Auto Finance and Direct Legal & Co debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have been advised after putting this on a PPI thread to post it here.

 

Background is bought car from Yes Car Credit / Direct Auto Finance about 5 years ago - no credit rating so this seemed to be the best offer could get. We did sign the PPI - as we were told it was a good idea to protect payments but no other advice was given to us.

 

3 years later - payments crippling £270 monthly on top of expensive car to fuel and Yes Car Credit agreed we could trade it for something cheaper. They then stopped trading and Direct Auto Finance advised us this was no longer an option.

 

After speaking to a few other car finance companies including DAF we decided best option would be to voluntary surrender the car back to Direct Auto Finance (DAF) as we had then paid off more that a 3rd of the balance. DAF were happy with this and we had many conversations in which we have names, dates, etc of who we spoke to. They kept telling us that we would not owe any further balance AT ALL and we did ask about the PP insurance at the time.

So car given up, new car got from another company and all seemed well.

 

Nearly a year later we started to get letters from a debt collecting agency on behalf of DAF stating there was an outstanding balance for approx £1.7K. We queried this and although it took many months finally managed to get the details which showed it was for unpaid PPI. we were told by this company that although we surrended the car we would not have been able to cancel the insurance and that it was still owing. We have tried and failed to speak to DAF themselves and have now been told by this company that DAF ceased to trade in Dec 07 (Is this true?).

 

Its hit and miss with this debt recovery agency with phone calls made and received - most are really unpleasant and threatening - but occasionally we get to speak to someone decent who at least tries to help and provide details. We have just been told all our conversations were recorded even though we never knew this or gave permission - this would be interesting to get taped copies as some of the nasty calls we got are very revealing about the tactics of this company.

 

So basically we are stuck, because DAF have gone we can't prove we don't owe the money although on one document we received it said vehicle repossessed which is totally untrue - we have another document which contradicts this as well so we can show we are telling the truth. but as for the PPI balance what can we do? After being told we didn't owe anything this influenced us to surrender it.

 

We had other choices at the time - 1 was to struggle on and keep paying as we owed only about £3k at the time - or 2 - the new finance we got with another company had offered to pay the remaining debt and take our car as a trade and put remaining difference on our current finance agreement so we weren't out of options totally.

 

Any advise would be really gratefully received as we are going nowhere with this and it is really stressing us out. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things spring to mind.

 

Firstly - you did not "voluntarily surrender" the agreement! You "voluntarily terminated" the agreement - that is what limits your liability to half the total amount payable less what you have already paid (complicated slightly if you were in arrears at the time). I would adopt the approach that you may have been missold the ppi, and challenge DLC's claims on that basis. Any probs give me a shout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok well things are getting interesting for my case against YCC/DAF/DLC

I am now speaking to a solictor to try and get this resolved. DLC still continue to ring but most calls now end up with them getting cross and advsiing to end the conversation as I keep catching them out in lies. The best one was when lady said DAF don't exist so I took her name, called DAF then called her back - it was brilliant - she then said they had changed her name and when I asked what to she couldn't answer.

 

Anyway I have found out a few more things about my case and this might help others in same situation.

 

1) the company who YCC bought the PPI from is giving a much lower balance then what YCC charged me for. I have asked DLC for a copy of the PPI insurance document and schedule - so far not provided.

 

2) the initial deposit was put on the insurance side instead of the car credit side which I have now found out is very wrong

 

3) DLC are saying it was a repossesion not a VT! - as the account defaulted - yes it did default but we caught up iin order to VT. I have asked for a copy of the court order for the reposession - so far not provided and not surprising since there wasn't one.

 

4)DLC said in a phone conversation that the VT didn't get processed as was a repossesion and the company that collected the car did not retun it to DAF. The statement I was given of recent transactions shows a credit which I always presumed was from the car selling at auction . DLC can't tell me or won't tell me what this is for.

 

Is there anyway to trace a car to find out what happened to it whether it got resold. It was in lovely condition when we gave it back and was about 6 years old so not that an old car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...