Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cyclist causes £550 damage to my car


apn8keh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just back from the police station. Have shown docs & described incidence. They won't report it as a road traffic accident as I wasn't in the car. They weren't too bothered about me facing the wrong way as they said 50% of cars are parked the wrong way round. He suggested I take multiple pictures of my car from varying distances to prove that it was perfectly visible since its always parked under a street lamp. Had a bit of info from a longtime traffic cop & apparently nighttime is considered as starting one hour after sunset & finishing one hour before sunrise so I can't be accused of parking illegally at night. I just need to weigh up whether I'm gonna open a can of worms & have to fork out compensation for his collarbone if they hold me to blame in anyway & is that gonna cost more than the damage to my car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew ! At least you didn't get banged up for the night.;)

 

IMHO, although his insurer's may try and wriggle out of it saying you should claim on YOUR car policy, you should go ahead, quantify your loss and send a letter to him seeking reimbursement.

 

If that brings excuses or refusal, issue Small Claim.

 

Sorry about his collarbone but you are in NO WAY responsible. There IS no can of worms to open here and he must take ALL of the blame.

 

As back up, have you checked with your car insurance Legal Cover bods.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu
If it was MY car that had been damaged by the cyclist, I would be sorely tempted to reward his honesty, by offering to go AT LEAST 50-50 with him on it's repair bill.

considering the cyclist expects to OP to foot the entire bill, I don't think I would be inclined to be so generous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My boyfriend laughed at me when i came out the police station saying at least I didn't have to spend the night there! About 2 hours after I got back from the station the policeman called to say that police have a book which details the hours of day & night. I said i'd checked the sunrise time & it wasn't looking to good for me, but he said 8.15 was not the time in his book, it was 7.45 so he said I was in the clear re the direction I was facing.

 

Can the cyclist really stand up in court and say the accident was my fault because he could not see a car parked under a street lamp in the rain. I'm guessing if thats the case he wouldn't have been able to see a person crossing the road.

 

My drive to work follows the route he would have took & there were plenty of cars parked the "wrong way". So he managed to negotiate all of them safely, only difference is he would have been going much slower as he passed them as they were on the flat whereas when he came past mine he would have been doing some speed as we're on a steep hill. I'm tempted to use a camcorder to walk the route he took to demonstrate that my car was no less visible than any of the others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked his policy with liverpool Victoria & he has cover under liability to public if he damages someone elses property in an accident.

 

To get back on track now you have established you are not in the wrong, he has insurance so he should use it - or has he got it for just in case type scenarios???????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think if I write to him that he will pass it to his insurers & they would cough up. He said they had told him I should claim on my car insurance, but thats typical insurance companies if they think it can be paid off another policy they will push that first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to him and claim from him.

 

How he d/w it is between him and his insurers.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you write to him, what he does next is a matter for him. Ultimately this man caused damage to your car; he is liable for the cost of repairs and any other costs.

 

Why not try something like:

 

After causing damage to my car at (location) on (date/time), you called at my address and admitted liability.

 

The cost of repairs is (or will be in the region of) £xxx. Please let me have your proposals to pay in full within fourteen days. If you do not contact me with a satisfactory proposal to settle, I will have to issue a claim against you in the County Court without further notice.

 

If you intend to ask your insurers to deal with this matter, please ensure that you inform them of the deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

SP and I have discussed this and think the suggestion above could be used as an LBA if no response is rec'd to a Prelim Ltr which could be sent on the following lines to the cyclist:-

 

Dear Cyclist,

 

Thank you for having the decency to call on me to admit responsibility for the damage caused to my car Make, model, reg'n no. when you ran into it on your bike at time and date.

I hope your injuries are not too serious and you'll make a speedy recovery.

 

I enclose copies of 2 estimates for the repairs necessary as a result of your collision. I would appreciate payment within 14 days in the sum of £xxx being the lower of the two estimates.

 

If you pass this on to Insurers, please make them aware of this deadline. I hope we are able to settle this matter amicably and quickly and look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

apn8keh

 

Send it Recorded Delivery and if you don't have a satisfactory reply after 14 days, send a Letter Before Action on the lines of Scarlet P's suggestion above, adapted as necessary.

 

You could worry forever about "What if they come back saying............????"

 

Send the letter, see what response comes back and decide how to progress from there.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

First up, the police should have reported this as an accident regardless of fault as it involved a motor vehicle on a road and some one was injured. It is irrelevant that no one was in the car.

 

Not that that really affects the liability aspects of this: There is no doubt that the cyclist is liable.

 

However, his household insurance will deny any liability - they always do. I had similar situation very recently when a neighbours tree collapsed and flattened my car.

 

I had to claim on my own car insurance who initially declined to make any attempt to pursue the other party - despite clear liability (the tree was totally rotten).

 

Ultimately I took my neighbour to the Small Claims Court to recover my uninsured losses. Her household insurance continued to deny all liability until they received a copy of the summons, at which point they changed their tune and admitted liability in full.

 

Don't give up on this because that's what they want you to do. Claim on your own car insurance and then go to the small claims court for your uninsured losses. It's very unlikely that you'll ever actually get to court - they'll most likely pay up before you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern re claiming through your own Insurers is that you may lose some of your No Claims Bonus. You can, of course recover this through Small Claims Court action.

 

However, there is possibly of a knock-on effect where, even when you reclaim for loss of NCB, you will still lose out in later years until you are back to the NCB level you were at before the incident.

 

That is why I would use the above letter and NOT use claim on YOUR insurance unless absolutely necessary.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Thanks for all your replies you've been a great help & I'm really glad I found this forum because you cover a wide range of topics.

 

Saturday morning a letter arrived from my insurers for my claim, which is funny because however I reported it to said she was putting it info only! Anyhow, they tried to tell me to pay the excess & get the car repaired & they might chase it....sod that! I have to call another department on Monday to ask them to chase the cyclists home insurance. There is no way I'm claiming on my insurance as your right you can't truly quantify the cost of increased premiums for the next how many years. I'm currently on 9 years & although they're protected you have to be careful about how many claims you have in 3 years. I currently have them chasing up for damage to my rear bumper that was reported to me by a note on my windscreen. Even though I haven't had the car repaired they registered it as a claim. I should be entitled to 2 claims in 3 years but with this 2nd one they reckon I lose 5 years no claims bonus. I'd rather drive around with 2 bust bumpers than pay any more to my insurers!

 

I'll keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern re claiming through your own Insurers is that you may lose some of your No Claims Bonus...

 

Your NCB may be temporarily suspended, however if you successfully prove liability against the other party your insurers will restore your NCB and refund any additional premium that you may have had to pay in the interim.

 

If you don't manage to prove liability against the other party you'll have to claim on your own insurance anyway - so you may as well get your car fixed now and argue the toss later. (And that way there's always the chance that your insurers will pursue the matter on your behalf).

 

Trust me on this one - I've just had to do it for real. It took 7 months to get the money back from the other party. That's a long time to be driving a damaged car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DJ,

 

Proving liability and getting the cyclist (or Insurer) to pay in full are 2 diff't things.

 

If APN8KEH's insurance can't or won't chase cylist (or Insurer) for losses, APN8KEH will have to sue cyclist for Policy Excess. However, as APN8KEH acknowledges above, recovering the costs of NCB loss over a number of years is difficult as the figures are difficult to quantify.

 

Glad you got your claim sorted eventually.:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

…recovering the costs of NCB loss over a number of years is difficult as the figures are difficult to quantify.

I hear what you're saying - and initially I wondered how to quantify the value of my NCB. So for the purpose of the court summons, I put in a deliberately high guesstimate (factoring in the knock-on effect over the next few years). But in practice neither of the insurance companies involved even tried to quantify it’s value. The 3rd party insurer paid for the damage (and my excess etc) and my own insurer restored my NCB.

 

I was surprised by this, too: I know that in theory it's a "No Claims" and not a "No Blames" Bonus, but this appeared to be standard practice where one party is wholly to blame.

 

I suspect it’s done as a reciprocal arrangement by insurers precisely to get around the difficulties (and endless arguments!) involved in trying to quantify the value of a lost NCB. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My concern re claiming through your own Insurers is that you may lose some of your No Claims Bonus. You can, of course recover this through Small Claims Court action.

 

However, there is possibly of a knock-on effect where, even when you reclaim for loss of NCB, you will still lose out in later years until you are back to the NCB level you were at before the incident.

 

 

You will lose NCB at the time of the claim and have to pay the excess.

 

However, if you recover all your insured losses and prove this to your insurer, they will usually re-instate your NCB (as well as going after the cyclist for their costs)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unlawful to park facing the wrong way after lighting up time and it has caused serious accidents before. However in this case I think it is simply a case of the cyclist not riding with due care and attention and as such he is liable. I think you would be better of making a claim againt him and let him sort it out with his household insurance or the insurance that he may have for his bike. Some riders do have such insurance.

 

If you find this useful please click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Churchill were about to call/write to the cyclist on Monday & I'm pushing for his insurance to pay. If not then it is better for me to pay for the repair myself rather than make a claim for £375. I'd rather keep a clean NCD & only claim for a big accident where the repair bills are much higher. If you can cope with driving with a damaged car it is better to wait for the other party to accept liability before you get your car repaired. That way they have to pay the full cost of repairs & you don't have to quantify the effect to your NCD as you haven't claimed.

 

I'll keep you posted as I hear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

Just had a call from Churchill. The cyclist has admitted full liability, his insurers will pay in full direct to garage so I don't have to pay any excess & my NCD has been reinstated. I hope this thread has been of help to anyone else in a similar situation. It seems most of us are covered for 3rd party whilst walking and cycling on our home insurance.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good result.:D

 

Thanks for the update.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...