Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Struggling Simon vs Cabot **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't worry SH, took that advice a long time ago. This is Citifinancial and is a confirmation of identity for my SAR. I telephoned Mr Cooke the Data Protection Officer in response to his letter , his secreatry was very polite and helpful. She says that the request will be fulfilled within the statutory time frame (... that's good progress IMHO).

 

I am who I am, whether or not I signed it with my left hand. They don't need a proof of signature after all.

 

Also sent a nice letter to Ms. Robertson c/o Cabot Towers, reminding her that ;

a) she hasn't responded to my letter of the tenth

b) Hasn't sent a copy of the complaints procedure which is outside of their own targets for response

c) Still hasn't provided a statement of account

d) Still hasn't let me know why they feel justified in enforcing this

e) Hasn't given me a breakdown of the 'interest and/or charges' they have applied since orginially contacting me.

 

f) oh .... and has until Thursday 24th Jan before a CCA breach occurs.

g) oh .... and has until Thursay 24th February before they break the law

h) oh .... and has until 7th March to provide me with everything they hold on me.

 

The phrase 'go ahead punk, make my day' seems fitting. Am actually disappointed not to be getting any letters from these monkeys.

 

God alone help them if Citi don't have the documents either. My feeling is it may be a likely scenario, as Associates have been taken over twice by other companies since the account was 'closed', almost 5 years ago now.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Also, meant to say that I have been asking around about the Law of Property 1925, just in case they try that old chestnut(although I think that they may just have cottoned on that in order for that to be applicable they'd have to be able to prove absolute assignment - which actually gives them more duties to the alleged debtors than CCA does - go figure!

 

Had a very interesting conversation with a guy who was head of department within the insolvency service for 23 years(retired some time ago), but some useful insights!!!

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With pleasure Rhia.

(not direct quotes, editied for brevity, I listned hard but didn't get a lot of it)

 

1)A legally assigned creditor needs only to attempt contact once every 5 years with the debtor in order to ensure that the debt remains persistant; the ability to enforce is a different matter - Insolvency Inspectors must identify the differences.

 

2)Under certain circumstances, it's possible to be discharged from bankruptcy after 4 months if, the debtor can prove it was not intended, i.e through illness, accident, the acrimonious end of a relationship, bereavement, or loss of a sibling or unfair dismissal.

 

as I understood him...to the extent of .. any traumatic experience.

 

I guess 'non compus mentis' .....or whatever it is..

 

Happy to introduce this fellow, if I can get him away from his cricket, beer/wine and dogs. (He's a 'foster home' for trainee guide dogs for the blind, a caring chap).

 

Another strory ...... they come from Forfar, where I was born.

 

Signing off,

Si

 

RHIA - PM Me for more .. bit sensitive

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow my train of thought

 

LoP can't be used to enfoce debts of the nature cabot are re-presenting(think about that word).

 

 

Cabot(and others) are buying debts that are now unimportant and unenforcable from the OC's. Their Loss!!!

 

The OC's have, in most cases, already written any monies due off - and gained relief from under capital gains taxation rules. It is a loss, no doubt.

They loaned money which wasn't recovered.

 

The OC's only have to prove that they made attempts to minimise the losses, and by redemption of a penny in the pound, even by assignation it counts -one letter then drop does work in their favour.

Edited by Struggling_Simon

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup Simon, the LoP is only the vehicle used to assign the debts... CCA still the Act that applies if they want to try their luck in court. I've long said this LoP nonsense is a bit of a red herring, and nobody should get too caught up in it. As has been proved, the ONLY thing that matters is the CCA. Irrespective of whether or not they think they need to produce one to satisfy a CCA request, nevertheless, they would need to dig one out to prove their case in court.

 

And as you have said, these debts tend to be getting bought WITHOUT there ever having been a valid agreement in the first place. A fact which really needs to be shouted from the rooftops.

 

If EVERYONE was aware of this fact, and EVERYONE challenged these companies, I really do believe their whole industry would collapse almost overnight. The stockmarkets might take a bit of a tumble. But hey! Perhaps certain people should have done their homework right at the very start.

 

If the OC's had done their job properly in the first place, none of this would be coming back to bite them on the bum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Much Celebrity Debtor(catchy name;) ).

 

To Business -

 

Much as it pains me to say, you know I think we may be seeing a change in Cabot's behaviour.

 

2 days before the CCA request is due to go into default, they've posted a standard template letter, forgive me if I quote salient points verbatim for expidience;

 

Although Cabot have requested the information, the original lender is experiencing a delay in retrieving the information from its archives.

What about your lovely archive in cabot towers,or is it not staffed like your office at No1. Kingshill , by coincidence PO BOX 241 services the same building.

 

We shall send the information when we have it

Second admission that you don't have it; You're rumbled. = MISREPRESENTATION -> Trading Standards , Credit Standards authority??

 

followed by

We will as a

.....You won't believe this.....

a gesture of goodwill suspend your account

 

Mighty nice of you big Ken ..... not to break the law..Again....

 

If you have any queries about your account , pleas call one of our helpful customer advisors
Do I look like i need advice from a money hound?

 

On a lighter note , the balance of the account (ahem, alleged debt actually) has decresed by a whole £13.80. I sure hope that's not my £10 Subject Access Request money.

 

I have the proof of delivery, and they didn't acknowledge.

I will be phoning Post Office today to get proof of cashing of my Postal Order. Somone signed for the delivery in the place that doesn't employ anyone? Interesting.....

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Much as it pains me to say, you know I think we may be seeing a change in Cabot's behaviour.

 

 

That's why the Cabot Fan Club and CAG need to be put forward for a Credit Today Magazine Award for ' Contributions to the Credit Industry throughout the Year' - we have walked up to mountains (and Towers :D ) and moved them :p

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree.

 

Can somone remind me what CSA rules are for handling complaints, I have asked 3 times for a complaint form, and still don't have one. Has been goign on for 3 weeks plus.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for CFC albeit, with a shamrock.

 

Nobody from Cabot has replied yet

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent SH

 

... who do I send this to? Is there a separate address I should use?

 

It's nearly criminal offence time, but I'm still waiting for Cabot to send me THEIR complaint form. No sign of it despite me asking for it three times.

 

I need to exhaust all the means available to me before FOS will hear my complaint.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

apologies for "quoting" legal sources that are copyright that resulted in post 1 on the above thread being removed

 

suffice to say the posting was highly significant supplying information from the highest sources

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pop your complaint in the post to the address on the form. Mark it FAO the lovely Claire Aynsley ([email protected])

 

You won't get a complaint form from Cabot, but you can ensure they are sticking to their own complaints procedures by perusing their literature. What, you don't havea copy? Oh, OK. You'll find it in my blog here...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK , That'll get posted tomorrow

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now Strange as it may seem I got a letter from those nice people over at cabot towers.

 

Dear Mr Simon,

 

We recently wrote to you informing you that the OC is experiencing delays ...

 

Well, that's real funny but I've had no such report from the OC. The Citicards DPO's office are very nice people. My S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) should be coming very soon. If there is no agreement there ... game over.

 

Although 24 days have passed since your request, we hope to be able to send this information to you soon.

 

We'll be reminding the lender ......

 

I hope you can too. Otherwise you'll break the law.

 

Your account shall remain on hold until further notice.

 

Can they still process my data , and pass it on to CRA's etc? When should I send a Section 10 Data Protection Act notice?

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HEy, someone ought to go to Cabot and offer to 'buy' all their debts on hold - must be thousands! :D

 

Poor ole Ken, what will he do with himself down there - maybe retire? Get out before his business is totally anniolated! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just itching to see that default of my credit report. I'll be patient until they comitted and offence then bang them with a section 10 notice to quit processing my data.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If any of the Men In Black from Cabot towers are reading....

Please resume clock-watching. You have until Close of Business before I call Trading Standards.

 

Cabot can't do anything from then on without committing an offence.

 

 

I have a preapred letter informing them of what they have failed to do, and what I now require them to do. I will be only to happy to enforce and order on these people.

 

Stop processing my data.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TIME IS UP .......... Let loose the dogs of law.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tick follows tock .. Soon my lovelies, soon.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HEADS UP ->

 

The results of my Cabot SAR have arrived before their due date. TBH quite impressed by that.

 

I wish I understood it all, but I have a plan for that. I will try to post up any queries I have once I've had a read through properly.

 

It gives me a nice excuse to write a big long letter asking them to remove it all.

:-)

 

Nowhere to I find/notice any assignment in it so far. No Credit agreement.

OOPS Cabot. Take me to court, or drop the lot. You failed. at law.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys sorry for the delay, I am busy at work.

 

I have a full response to Cabots SAR Results in preparation

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...