Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AS Securi-T - READ IF YOU HAVE A TICKET FROM THEM


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5593 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

She was not the driver but the letter accompanying the PCN says "since this is a civil matter it is decided in law that the registered keeper is vicariously responsible". There was a sign warning of cctv surveillance for parking offences. Having never dealt with a private company before, we wondered if this ticket is enforceable?

As lamma has said not one iota is enforceable.

 

There has been no decision in law that makes the keeper vicariously responsible. (They Wish!). What they are doing is misquoting the Road Traffic Act and the Traffic Management Act which makes the RK responsible for the any fines/penalties.

 

Now get this. You don't have a fine or Penalty Charge Notice. A private company cannot issue these. A court or otherwise statute authorised body can issue a fine and a council can issue a Penalty Charge Notice.

 

Arse T (and others) issue Parking Charge Notices and call them PCNs to try to fool people that they are valid. What they are in effect are invoices for an alleged breach of contract. What's more as it is a civil case they have to prove the case - they have to prove that a contract exists. They are writing to you as the RK not as the driver.

 

Have a read of the Private Parking Charges guide in the stickies section of the forum and also the template letters. The choice to respond or ignore is yours. You will be probably bombarded with bumf whatever you do.

 

In your situation I'd send a letter denying the debt and then ignore anything other than court papers.

 

BTW these guys usually don't take people to court and on the rare occassions they have, they've failed to show when faced with a properly mounted defense. (There are loads of people on these boards who will help in the extremely unlikely event that this ever comes to court.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. What a great job you guys are doing. My wife and I were tempted to pay it, even though it felt like we were being mugged. Now we've seen the support out there we're determined to fight it. I'll post updates as and when anything further happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

Can someone help me?

I parked in a church car park which was signed to say 'no parking without a permit'. I was popping to post something in the church on a bank holiday monday and there were no other cars in this car park. My parnter was driving my car not me, but i was in the passanger seat. I was gone about 3 mins and returned to a fine on my car. I looked everywhere for the parkng attendant, but they must have vanished within seconds!

The fine is for £118 which im not paying. Can they legally do this? Especially on a bank holiday when i thought all parking restrictions are not applied? Im not paying this firstly cause it was a bank holiday, secondly because of the sneaky way they were watching me, thirdly because £118 is obsene! And forthly because i was actually visiting the church?

Can you please help to advise me?

thanks alot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Can someone help me?

I parked in a church car park which was signed to say 'no parking without a permit'. I was popping to post something in the church on a bank holiday monday and there were no other cars in this car park. My parnter was driving my car not me, but i was in the passanger seat. I was gone about 3 mins and returned to a fine on my car. I looked everywhere for the parkng attendant, but they must have vanished within seconds!

The fine is for £118 which im not paying. Can they legally do this? Especially on a bank holiday when i thought all parking restrictions are not applied? Im not paying this firstly cause it was a bank holiday, secondly because of the sneaky way they were watching me, thirdly because £118 is obsene! And forthly because i was actually visiting the church?

Can you please help to advise me?

thanks alot

Link to post
Share on other sites

a church car park - thats a first !

as long as its not a council ticket you and your money are quite safe.

I, and a suspect quite a few others, would love to see pictures of everything they stuck on your car. both sides of the invoice, a picture of the sticky envelope. everything. suitably washed of your personal details.

 

I smell a lot of potential illegality in this invoice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just received another letter giving me 14 days notice and to pay £117.50 for the parking charge and £80.00 for the associated costs, totalling, £197.50!!! This letter is from RCS - Revenue Collection Services. They are demanding this otherwise they will take us to court.

 

I still believe its a [problem] but it was my parents car and they are concerned, what do we do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and have kept the last 3 letters they have sent us. Its interesting this letter was from RCS who are trading under AS Securi-T! Checked on companies House and they exist under AS Securi-T!!

 

Still cant belive they are getting away with this!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Revenue Collection Services.

 

This crowd really are beyond the pale!

 

Their in-house "debt collection agency" used to be called Inland Recovery but now that the Inland Revenue has been incorporated into HM Revenue and Customs, AS Securi-T have changed the name, presumably to avoid confusion :confused:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I've been reading this thread with interest for a while and thought I would share my experience of A S Securi-t LTD.

 

My wife received a letter in August after they obtained our details from the DVLA for a parking offence outside a row of shops in North Birmingham. The car was left unattended for no more than 5 minutes when she popped into a newsagent (3 shops along) to buy a drink.

 

We have ignored 2 letters from A S Securi-t demanding £176.25 and now have a letter from RCS (Ryan Carter) with an extra £80.00 added. The letter states:

"Unless the payment shown is received in full within 14 days of the date of this letter, representatives of RCS will be instructed to attend your premises to discuss the matter in persons and/or legal proceedings for the recovery thereof may be commenced without any further notice to you".

 

Has anyone been visited by them?

 

Thanks for all the advice so far!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have also been issued a parking fine from AS Secuti-T in Bristol. I parked on an empty carpark next to Staples just off the M32. I am a quality inspector and was attending a building site opposite. the streets are always understandably choccer-block with parked vehicles, and there is no easy accesible car-park (although ironically we are working on a new car park).

 

The ticket states that i have violated regulations 1 & 8

1 being unauthorised and illegally parked, and

8 being did not use car park providers premises and went elsewhere at the time of issue of the ticket.

 

The issuer obviously observed me leave the carpark, and then slapped the ticket on the screen. Although the ticket says i was on Staples carpark, i was actually parked at the opposite end of a shared carpark. The other unit on the site is closed down (i think it used to be a tile centre).

 

Yes there are signs up concerning parking but i did not think they would apply if the store is empty. Now i am being asked to pay £70.50 for parking on an unused carpark for 40 minutes. Is this legal?:mad:

 

Thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS Securi-T are well known here - look at the size of this thread.

 

Easiest and best thing to do is do nothing.

 

Ignore them, do not engage, let them send their dross to you.

 

After a couple of letters from AS you will get letters from Revenue Collection Services, a pretend debt collection agency - actually AS Securi-T using different stationery. Make sure that you ignore these too.

 

The only complication is if you have a company or a lease car. You should inform the company that they are about to receive a bogus invoice which on no account should they pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have also been issued a parking fine from AS Secuti-T in Bristol. I parked on an empty carpark next to Staples just off the M32. I am a quality inspector and was attending a building site opposite. the streets are always understandably choccer-block with parked vehicles, and there is no easy accesible car-park (although ironically we are working on a new car park).

Poxy Cabot's Circus strikes again! The lack of parking in the centre of Bristol is well known and has been a problem since the devlopment of Cabot Circus started. Its just going to get worse (even with that new car park!) and the council are very unfriendly to motorists at the best of times. Still at least you are not dealing with a council ticket.

 

Now i am being asked to pay £70.50 for parking on an unused carpark for 40 minutes. Is this legal?:mad:

 

Thanks for any advice

 

As Barnsley Boy has said Arse-T are well known and ignoring them is the best policy.

 

If you need further information have a read of the PPC Charges guide in the stickies section. It will explain the "legality" of these charges.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I live in a flat in Westcliff on Sea and recently the property management company (CountryWide property Management) have enlisted the help of Securi-T to reduce the problem of people working across the road from parking in our private carpark....

 

Although I have a valid permit, my problem is that I ride a motorcycle and there is nowhere to put it (although I know where I would like to stick it)... I have contacted the management company regarding this and they have advised me that my registration has been sent to Securi-T - no further action will be taken.... I received another ticket last night (21:50).

 

The worst thing is that the attendent (JD296) puts the PCN sticky on the petrol tank! not on the small visor bit (I have never noticed the PCNs on car doors / bonnets etc) - there is visible marking now on my motorcycle petrol tank....

 

So please, watch out..it is not even safe to park at your own residence without these buffoons causing trouble.

Edited by The_chap
Grammar check
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found this great site but not to sure how to use it but here goes. My son received a PCN (parking charge notice) from A.S Securi T Ltd on 30/7/08 at 01 15 whilst visiting a friend in a private housing estate. There were no visible parking restriction signs no yellow lines in the immediate area but apparantly this area was designated as a turning area for emergency vehicles. Hence the ticket. IAW with small print i challenged the ticket within the alloted time frame and sent the letter by recorded delivery. We heard no more until last week when we received a letter saying the fine had not been paid and if they did not receive payment within so many days they would forward the file to their claims recovery department. To date they have not replied to my original letter contesting the vallidity of the PCN. They now want £117.50 instead of £88.13. From all the various comments on this thread can i just forget about this or do i write further letters.

Thanks in anticipation of some useful advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

£88.13 clearly shows it is a VATable item too (£75 plus VAT) What a way to add insult to injury, they want 75 quid and the government want a cut of £13.88 for the ADDED VALUE you have received by incurring this "invoice"!!

 

By ignoring you score on 2 counts, stuff the PPC and make sure the government don't profit by being party to this illegal [problem].

 

That's a WIN WIN in my book. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...