Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carpet Right Hidden Charges


mickymart
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest louis wu
However, I fully agree with your sentiments. It's just that cut-price and good service very rarely go together...! :)

 

 

Sadly, that is no dispute over that one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your misfortunes.

 

Right this is what you need to do....

 

Who chose the fitters? Did Carpetright supply them?

If they did then it is Carpetright that have to deal with it.

 

If they recommended them and you contacted the fitters, then you would chase the fitters yourself.

 

Now, when your mother told the salesman she is injured and cant move the furniture. The salesman agreed this would be fine, they will sort it.

 

That is in you favour. A verbal agreement is good as any other, however it was verbal. So you need to prove it. Family dont stand as good witnesses in court.

 

Also you need proof that your mother gave £40 to the fitters. These facts matter. Remember the fitters word is only as good as your mothers word. So they havent got the upper hand. Its a level playing field.

 

Also if the contract states a price then it is only that price you have to pay.

 

However I suggest this first :

 

Send a letter via recorded delivery. Put the following in your letter.

 

Dear XXXXXXXXX

 

Supply of goods and services act 1982

 

*State exactly what has happened. Emphasise the fact the salesman agreed that they could handle the furniture etc.

 

*Im sure your mother was intimidated, she was vunerable and the fitters took advantage. STRESS this point.

 

Im holding Carpetright in breach of contract under the Supply of goods and services act 1982 because you failed to excercise reasonable care and skill. Also failed to charge a reasonable price.

 

I expect a full refund of my £40 with a response to my letter in 14 days.

 

Etc, etc.

 

Keep a copy of this letter for your own reference.

 

If you dont get a response, or you get an unsatisfactory response then call your local trading standards office for further advice.

 

You must give 14 days.

 

Remember though this may come down to your word against the fitters, worse case scenario is small claims court. Then its down to the judge.

 

Hope it helps

 

Consumerised.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never posted on this site until yesterday.

 

The fitters will act as if they havent got anything to do with Carpetrite and vice versa. They both need business.

 

I deal with these kind of cases(SOGA, SOGSA etc) day in day out. I always say get everything in writing first, that way you know where you stand.

 

Unfortunately even the bigger companies will find ways to swindle their customers out of money. Competition is rife and unfortunately we the consumers have to pay in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Re : Carpetright fitting/hidden charges , the fitters that C/R use are sub-contractors and vary enormously in quality and attitude , the attitude CAN be affected by their treatment by the shop , examples are ;

1/ the company insists that fitters replace all faulty flooring FOR FREE , do interstore collections all over the county FOR FREE and pay the shop £8 per day for "Admin`" charges .

In addition to this , while a fitter may recieve £35 to fit a hall/stairs/landing ( around 3x hours work ), the shop will have charged the customer approx £25 for delivery and £25 for stair surcharge , both of which are done by the fitter for NO reward .

If the fitter does not agree to suffer these conditions he will get no work .

Re the company as a whole , I would say that ANY customer WILL save MASSIVE amounts of cash if they do these FEW things :

1/ DO NOT buy the underlay , doorbars or gripper (s/e ) from the shop but source it through a reliable fitter , B&Q or via the internet .

2/ ask this reliable fitter to collect your floorcovering from C/R , thereby negating the £25 delivery charge

3/ ask for a detailed breakdown of costs from your fitter before using him ( he should Not charge more than £2.50 per sq metre to fit carpet )

4/ ask the fitter if he can source the floorcovering you like at a better price , you will be AMAZED how often this will bear fruit .

 

Generally customers pay double the amount they should for underlay , FIVE times what they should for gripper and nearly three times what they should for doorbars , THAT IS A LOT OF YOUR MONEY to give to strangers who frankly have no right to have it .

 

PS , a word to the " wise " from someone who knows the retail trade backwards ... the ONLY price you should trust is what is on the bill !!!

70 % off ??? C`mon , really ? You know what they say , " If it sounds too good to be true , it probably is !! ".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another wrinkle worth knowing, is the CR do not have the facility to deliver to customers. It is the fitters who arrange this as part of the installation. So, if you just want the carpet, CR will be unable to deliver it (as their fitters want to do the whole job). Unless you are prepared to uplift if from the store, you'll be on your own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

legal position - Carpetright are not liable they don't employ the fitters and you pay them outside of any price for the carpet. The fitters are liable for the damage but it would be difficult to prove they caused it.

 

moral position - Carpetright should consider how these guys make them look as most people would connect them to the company. They should reflect on the age of the customer and her situation and think about how they'd look on Watchdog

 

Common sense position - have a friendly chat with the store manager seeking sympathy. Take the lady along and ask what they can do to help. If this fails, then take action along the bad PR route, local paper, radio, Watchdog, help the aged etc. Iithink the legal case is too flimsy and would struggle - can the extra payment of £40 be proved?

 

Regarding the colour issue - if the carpet has the same code as the order form its a done deal. We've bought carpet that looked different in the store (under flourescent lighting) but have learned to live with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...